Skip to Content

Are you prepared for Wrath of the Lich King? WoW Insider has you covered!
AOL Tech

Posts with tag lawsuits

Guy Sues Facebook, Then Joins Facebook

Guy Who Sued Facebook Joins Facebook
You might remember a little over a year ago a relatively unknown company called ConnectU (started by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss and Divya Narenda) sued Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg for stealing their ideas to create Facebook. While the lawsuit quietly drags on, at least one member of the ConnectU team has apparently softened his opposition to the ubiquitous social network.

Divya Narenda has been found on Facebook. The Zuckerberg-hating Narenda has apparently surrendered to the ubiquity of Facebook and created himself a profile that he has foolishly left visible to anyone in the New York network.

Narenda, of course, left ConnectU out of his education and work sections of his profile. Friends are quite shocked by his joining Facebook -- entries on his wall contain posts like, "Um, was this part of a legal agreement or something? I never thought I'd see the day..." [From: Valleywag]

Aerosmith's Steven Tyler Files Suit Against Online Impersonators




Earlier today, Steven Tyler -- lead singer and founding member of Aerosmith -- filed suit against individuals on Google's Blogger site, which Tyler claims is full of bloggers that have been impersonating him in their online postings, News.com.au reports.

The lawsuit alleges that these anonymous bloggers have caused harm to Tyler and his girlfriend Erin Brady by revealing private facts about the couple's lives, using his image without permission, and spreading falsehoods. Blogs written on the subject of Tyler's recently deceased mother were, according to the suit, particularly hurtful.

The blogs in question were taken down by Google earlier today and are under review to assess any breach of Blogger's terms of service.

While we believe anybody who says anything about anybody's mama deserves to have their butt whooped, one question does remain: Who, having seen any recent picture of Steven Tyler, would want to impersonate him? [From: News.com.au]

Prince Sues Devoted Norwegian Fans Who Made Cover Album





On June 7th, the artist and sex symbol formerly known as Prince officially turned 50 and apparently someone brought hime the wrong gift. It was a copy of a new five-disc Prince tribute album, which consists of 81 cover songs by Norwegian musicians of every genre including that country's National Symphony Orchestra.

Soon after receiving
"Shockadelica-50th Anniversary Tribute to The Artist Known As Prince," the Artist sued C+C Records, the Norwegian music label that put the tribute together. The suit demanded that all copies of the album -- which has been critically acclaimed and peaked at no. 8 on the Norwegian charts -- be destroyed. The label's owner, Christer Falck, is also a well known television actor and a huge Prince fan. Since no one was paid for their participation, Falck didn't think he owed Prince anything more than a free copy of the disc. Especially since the description on the label's Web site features this loving statement:

"This is more than just a Prince-tribute album. This is actually EVERYTHING the Norwegian musical scene has to offer 2008. All is made with love to the world's greatest artist ever, Prince."

Actually, Falck shouldn't be surprised that he was sued, as this isn't the first time Prince has censured his fans. In 2007, he gave legal notice to YouTube, eBay and The Pirate Bay to take down all of his copyrighted content. Then, last October, Prince's record company, Universal, demanded that YouTube remove this home video of a toddler dancing to a barely audible clip of "Lets Go Crazy." Even this past spring, Prince demanded that YouTube remove a fan-recorded video of his cover of Radiohead's "Creep" at Coachella.

The C+C Records page and the "Shockadelica" MySpace page have free samples of the limited edition album. It's sure to be a collectors item. [Source: Wired]

Related Articles:





Hidden 'Grand Theft Auto' Sex Scene Still Earning Legal Attention

Hidden Grand Theft Auto Sex Scene Still Earning Legal AttentionIt's been about three years since the so-called 'Hot Coffee' scandal rocked the gaming world; a hidden sex scene in 'Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'. It was the cause of an uproar from parents all the way up to Hillary Clinton, and, of course lead to the inevitable lawsuit. Now, as millions have moved on to enjoy 'Grand Theft Auto IV,' it seems that only lawyers still care about the infamous scene.

There's a class action lawsuit on the books against the publisher, Take-Two Interactive, that is supported by lawyers who planned to make a windfall $1.3 million in legal fees representing those customers who lodged complaints against the game. However, only 2,676 actually joined the lawsuit, and with most just getting a payout of $5-$35 and a replacement copy of the game, Take-Two is set to only have to pay out about $30,000 to settle the suit (plus make a $860,000 charitable donation). This means the lawyers leading the suit are charging 40-times the amount they have won their clients!

Seems all is well in the U.S. legal system. [Source: The New York Times]

Metallica Asks Bloggers to Pull Down Advance Reviews



You know what's heavy metal? Biting a live chicken head off on stage. You know what's not? Whining to music critics and telling them not to review your precious new album.

Metallica invited music critics in London to listen to six tracks off its forthcoming album, with the implicit implication that the critics would go ahead and write reviews based on what they'd heard (no non-disclosure agreements, contracts, etc). So, immediately after the reviews hit the Web, Metallica's management contacted the writers in attendance and asked them to take down the reviews.

The music blog Blinded by the Hype contacted The Quietus, one of the blogs that had run a review, wondering what had happened to the piece. Here's what editor Luke Turner had to say:

"The Quietus kept our article up the longest and, as no nondisclosure agreement had been signed," he wrote, "[we were] not prepared to remove it merely due to the demands of Metallica's management. We only removed the article earlier today to protect the professional interests of the writer concerned."


Since their whole hissy-fit about people downloading their music without paying (also very heavy metal of them, we should add), Metallica has garnered its fair share of hateration on the Internet. This newest tantrum probably won't help matters. [Source: ArsTechnica]

Teen Kicked Off Student Council for "Douchebag" Blog Post

Teen Kicked Off Student Council for
Blog posts and social networking sites have cost people jobs, relationships, and freedom. But it's rare that high school students get blatantly censored and reprimanded for using for using foul language on said online outlets outside of school.

Avery Doninger was the class secretary at Lewis S. Mills High School in Burlington, Connecticut, but was barred for running for re-election her senior year after she referred to school officials as "douchebags" in posting on her personal blog.

The trouble began when the school repeatedly delayed a battle of the bands the student government had organized. After being rescheduled twice already, the school wanted to reschedule again because a particular teacher could not make the event to work the lighting equipment. When the student government suggested hiring a professional or letting a parent work the equipment, the school balked.

Google Says Viacom Is Destroying the Internet

Google Says Viacom is Destroying the InternetThe drama between Google and Viacom over copyright infringing videos on YouTube staggers on, despite having fallen out of focus during the last several news cycles. In the latest development, Google, which owns YouTube, has filed papers in the U.S. District Court of Manhattan,charging that Viacom's lawsuit against YouTube threatens the very nature and existence of the Internet.

Google claims that -- according to the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright act -- YouTube "goes far beyond its legal obligations in assisting content owners to protect their works." It says that Viacom's relentless constant claimes of copyright infringement "threaten the way hundreds of millions of people legitimately exchange information, news, entertainment and political and artistic expression."

The $1 billion lawsuit filed by Viacom last year was rewritten and refiled last month by the company to include claims that posting copyrighted material is a central part of YouTube's business plan. It seems that traditional media will stop at nothing to keep people glued to their television sets. Well, come on, with the amount of times that Viacom-owned MTV repeats its vapid reality shows these days, there's little chance that some of us aren't going to end up watching TV programs the traditonal way -- on a TV. So give us access on YouTube, too. [Source: The New York Times]

eBay Sues Craigslist

eBay Sues Craigslist, Steps on Own FootIt's a widely held belief that eBay and Craigslist, the two premier online places to get rid of your old stuff and buy someone else's, are bitter rivals. While it's true that they're definitely competitors, what's not widely known is that eBay actually owns roughly a third of Craiglist, having bought 28% of the company back in 2004. Odd, then, that eBay would be suing Craigslist (and thus itself) for perpetrating some sort of unknown affront against the company.

The lawsuit is sealed, meaning the exact complaint made by eBay is a secret, but it has something to do with actions made by Craigslist directors Craig Newmark and Jim Buckmaster, whom eBay feels were damaging to the company. The suit is an attempt to get those two to get the company back on whatever track eBay thinks is best. Exactly what track that is, unfortunately, also be a secret.

Maybe eBay is just bitter that its Craigslist competitor, Kijiji.com, hasn't exactly caught on. [Source: AOL Money & Finance/AP]

Teacher Fired For Viewing Pornography Sues District


A former Cedarburg, Wisconsin teacher, fired for viewing porn while on the job in 2006, is back, $9 million lawsuit in hand.

Robert Zellner was fired after school officials concluded that he had viewed porn, at his computer, on a Sunday, for 67 seconds. In the lawsuit, Zellner's attorney claims that the disgraced teacher was making sure that access to adult material wasn't available to students. The complaint goes on to allege that the school district violated Zellner's free speech.

The whole free speech thing probably isn't going to carry much weight, what with buzzwords flying around like porn, "blonde" and children(read the full article and you'll get the blonde reference). However, the elapsed time that Zellner spent viewing the page/s does raise some eyebrows, at least from a comedic standpoint. What pleasure could he have derived from 67seconds of porn?

Zellner may be lying, he may be a pervert and it may be a blessing that he can no longer find work as a teacher in Wisconsin. Anywhere.

On the other hand, an uptight school system may have ruined an honest man's life and, more importantly, his reputation. [Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, via Fark]


Related Stories:






For Sale: Videos of Wal-Mart Execs In Drag



Wal-Mart is not happy.

Flagler Productions Inc., a production company hired by Wal-Mart in the 1970s to film company events, has begun selling the videos to, well, whoever wants them. The videos, of which there are thousands, contain everything from company executives dressing in drag to, let's say, less than pleasant rants on the merits of organized labor.

The videos are of particular interest to attorneys involved in the lawsuit against Wal-Mart on behalf of 1.6 million women that claim widespread sexual discrimination. One video shows the founder of Wal-Mart, Ed Walton, admitting that efforts to train and promote women had been unsatisfactory at best.

In a statement to ABC News, Wal-Mart responded to this banana-hammockery in a eerily calm manner with the following:

"Needless to say, we did not pay Flagler Productions to tape internal meetings with this aftermarket in mind. It's definitely an unusual business model on their end, and we can't imagine too many other clients will be eager to pay for this service."

Creepy.

We are not fooled by the soothing tone of this politically correct statement and fully expect every employee of Flagler Productions to be utterly destitute within the next 48 hours.


From ABC





Apple Slapped With Class Action Suit Over Misleading iMac Ads

Apple Slapped with Class Action Suit Over Misleading iMac Ads
Apple, no stranger to class action law suits at this point, is under the gun again. This time for misleading claims about the screens on its 20 inch model iMac PCs. Apple claims that its screens can display millions of colors -- 16,777,216 to be exact -- and while that is true of the 24-inch model and the previous generation 20- and 24-inch models, the recent update to the iMac line brought a downgrade for the 20-inch model.

Instead of using the same 8 bit in-plane switching screens as the previous generation, the new 20-inch iMacs went with an older technology called 6-bit twisted nematic film. This older technology limits the screens to 262,144 simultaneous colors, which limits the viewing angle and negatively effects color accuracy, making the screen completely ill-suited for video editing and digital imaging and photography.

The suit has been filed by the California based law firm Kabateck Brown Kellner.

From Consumerist

Related Links:

Naked Canadians Consider Class Action Lawsuit Against Paypal




Today a group of naked Canadians are considering a class action lawsuit against PayPal. The Federation of Canadian Naturists (FCN) -- an organization for Canadian nudists-- claims that PayPal suddenly cut off its services to them, refusing to process their magazine subscription payments after four years of business.

The FCN are not the first business to get denied services for supposedly breaking the acceptable use policy. Since 2003, PayPal has excluded so called "sexually oriented Web sites" from using their services for the purchase of digital goods like membership or subscription fees. However, any Web site is allowed to use PayPal for the sale of sexually oriented physical goods, like DVDs or magazines that are then delivered by hand to the customer. PayPal claims this is due to the immense administrative cost of doing business with an industry riddled with criminal schemes and frequent "charge backs" (when a customer disputes a charge to their paypal account.) In addition to this discrepancy between physical and digital goods, PayPal further reserves the right to deny Web sites that are distributing sexually oriented material involving minors or for Web sites that "facilitate meetings for sexually oriented activities." These two lines from the Mature Audiences section of their Acceptable Use Policy are what PayPal claims the FCN has violated.

While the nudists object to being considered sexually oriented in the first place, the government affairs director for the federation, Judy Williams, says "PayPal's decision about Going Natural and its claims about the FCN are unfounded embellishments born of ignorance."

According to the history, naturists base their practice on a nineteenth-century reform movement that believed the cure for the ailments of industrial society "was exposure to the natural healing elements or fresh air, sunlight, and water--preferably with loose or absent clothing." In addition, they don't believe that the naked body is inherently erotic, which anyone who has been to a nude beach can attest to. While the images in Going Natural magazine might include pictures of naked minors, a court would probably deem them no more pornographic than those baby pictures of you with a shampoo mohawk.

The last line of the PayPal's Mature audiences policy says that "PayPal will not include sexual preferences or viewpoints as a factor in determining what goods or services are prohibited under the Mature Audiences Policy." We think the FCN might not agree.

Related Links:




Cell Phone + Car Crash = $5.2 Million Settlement

Cell Phone + Car Crash = $5.2 Million Settlement

Some states, like New York, have banned hand-held cell phone use while driving outright. Others are just relying on existing laws or passing new ones that, in more general terms, prohibit drivers from doing anything distracting while driving. Back in 2006 Georgia had no specific law against hand-held cell phone use, but that didn't stop a woman from recently being awarded a $5.2 million settlement in the state after tragically losing her arm in a traffic accident that year.

The woman was traveling on the highway at 77 miles-per-hour when she was rear-ended by an employee of International Paper Co. Her car rolled and her arm was wedged between the car and the pavement. It ultimately had to be amputated below the shoulder.

Georgia has since passed a law specifically banning hand-held cell phone use, but whether or not it's illegal in your state is something drivers should consider before making that call on the road.

From textually.org

Related Links:

Little Old Lady Suing Electronics Giants Over Laser Patents

little old ladyGertrude Neumark Rothschild may be older than the day is long, but she knows a thing or two about laser beams.

Or so she claims. The retired Columbia University professor is bringing a case against nearly all the major consumer electronics giants, ranging from Nokia to Samsung to Sony. Her complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) on February 20th, and insists that 30-odd companies are violating a patent she owns for "light-emitting and laser diodes." Today, the ITC has agreed to investigate the matter.

Rothschild has had success with similar lawsuits against Philips and major manufacturers in the past (the Philips matter was settled out of court earlier this month).

You go, girl.

From Engadget

Related links:

Class Action Lawsuit Against Microsoft for Windows Vista Marketing

Things continue to look worse for Microsoft's Windows Vista. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman certified a class-action lawsuit claiming that Microsoft's marketing practices during the holiday season of 2006 misled consumers and artificially increased computer prices.

The Seattle Post Intelligencer reports that many found that their new computers labeled with "Windows Vista Capable" stickers could only run the stripped-down, Home Basic version of the software. Because Home Basic lacks many of the features Microsoft advertised as "Vista" --Aero, Media Center PC, and window-switching--the lawsuit argues that the computers were deceptively labeled. In response, Microsoft says that Home Basic includes all the essential features of Windows Vista.

From AP


Related Links:


AOL Tech Network



Latest Reviews from CNET.com

CNET provides the latest tech news, unbiased reviews, videos, podcasts, software, and downloads, making tech products easy to find, understand and use.

Top Product Reviews

AOL News

Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in: