Study: Blame E-Mail for Rumor Mongering, Not Blogs

Switched has a new home! Huffpost Tech.
Click here to visit the new home of Switched!Trending: Facebook Apple Google Security iPhone Android Tips Wikileaks Design Celebs Cell Phones BlackBerry 101 More Topics »


Watching Twitter tonight has taught me one thing, Phillies fans are a bunch of whiny dicks. But it's ok, every tank needs a bottom feeder.
And I thought I wanted to hug Johan last week. I think I'm officially in love.
Listening to Ra, glance at the notes and there's @AliveRecords. Nice cover, Mr. Boissel! @TheGloryFires #magiccityjams http://t.co/uT0M77VJ
Comments
1
Subscribe to commentsBluePlateMar 21st 2011 3:39PM
As a folklorist, this makes perfect sense. Urban legends (which is what these stories are) rely on word-of-mouth circulation, not from strangers but from people we know, whose ideas and opinions we trust. Blogs are more like news reports; while the audience is certainly free to reply to and even question the blogger's info, the friend-of-a-friend, personalized communication of email transmission much more closely resembles the face-to-face transmission of oral communication, which urban legends relied on before the Internet. Urban legends were often printed in pre-internet newspapers, too, usually as human interest stories (with no one bothering to check facts), but it has always been the more personal mode of transmission that makes these stories so convincing (and that therefore propagates their continued circulation).