'Forced Obsolescence': HarperCollins Makes Libraries Re-Buy E-Books After 26 Checkouts

But there are a couple problems with this line of thinking. For one, e-books don't wear out! As for the other, some librarians in Oklahoma have proven that HarperCollins's arbitrary checkout limitation is arbitrary even when judged by physical books. Having examined the HarperCollins hardbacks in their library, these librarians show that some books could survive five times as many checkouts as HarperCollins had suggested.
Let's face it; capping the number of times an e-book can be checked out is a little ridiculous. But, if HarperCollins is going to set an arbitrary limitation in order to gouge money from our public libraries, it might as well pick a limitation that's slightly grounded in reality.





'Undercover Boss': Top 4 Moments From Season 4 [VIDEO]
Las Vegas Court Officials Accused Of Covering Up Sex Assault [VIDEO]
Walmart vs. Costco: How Do They Really Compare?
Groomers Lose Dog, Claim Not Responsible
The Story Behind Shapewear: From Girdles to Spanx
'Grease' Cast: Where Are They Now?
Microsoft E3 2013 Xbox liveblog!
Baby Fox Asks for Help
Careless Chinese Baggage Handler Really Throws Himself Into His Work
Lost Dog Found 500 Miles Away












Comments
2
Subscribe to commentsKevin CarsonMar 4th 2011 1:08PM
I'm not surprised, seeing as how this comes from a Murdoch operation. It probably took weeks to convince him that listing books for sale online didn't involve some sort of "piracy" that he just hadn't caught onto yet. Anyone who thinks showing up in a Google search is exploitative is too stupid to live -- it's like suing someone for telling people where your shop is! It does my heart good to see him running the Murdoch newspaper empire into the ground with his meatheaded paywalls.
NemephosisMar 5th 2011 8:19AM
This is basically extorting libraries, and last I checked, extortion was a crime...