Obama Administration Wants Veto Power Over New Domain Names

The process of approving suffixes like .com, .org and .net is overseen by a non-profit called Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which operates under a contract with the government. Current procedures allow for governments to offer advice on submitted suffixes, but ICANN has the final say. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) thinks that states should play a greater role in the approval process, and is calling for all proposals to undergo a mandatory "review" by an ICANN advisory board (PDF). The board would consist of representatives from 100 nations, any of which may "may raise an objection to a proposed (suffix) for any reason." Unless another nation objects, the proposal in question will be automatically rejected.
In a statement provided to CNET, the NTIA argued that the veto "has merit as it diminishes the potential for blocking of top level domain strings considered objectionable by governments. This type of blocking harms the architecture of the DNS and undermines the goal of universal resolvability (i.e., a single global Internet that facilitates the free flow of goods and services and freedom of expression)." This openness, the agency claimed, is critical to guaranteeing "the long-term viability of the Internet as a force for innovation and economic growth."
Last year, China and other countries voiced their concerns about the domain approval process, arguing that ICANN had seized "unilateral control of critical Internet resources," and suggesting that the U.N. would be a more appropriate forum for deliberation. In December, the national governments participating in the process issued a statement (PDF), saying they were "very concerned" that "public policy issues raised remain unresolved" -- including those pertaining to "use and protection of geographical names."
The current system will likely be tested very soon. Both the dotGAY Initiative and the .GAY Alliance have already announced that they'll be applying for the .gay suffix this year -- an application that is likely to draw the ire of conservative governments around the world. In the meantime, national representatives will continue to work toward a compromise with ICANN, which is currently compiling a so-called "scorecard" of governmental concerns. The scorecard will be published in two weeks, just ahead of a two-day meeting in Brussels, during which ICANN will meet with governments in the hopes of finding an "agreed upon resolution" to the ongoing international debate.





Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Justin Bieber Booed, Gets Standing Ovation at Billboard Music Awards
2013 Billboard Music Awards Best and Worst Dressed
Watch: Kansas Meteorologist Seeks Shelter From Tornado
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
Two Pilots Fired After Brazilian Pop Star Takes Captain's Seat Mid-Flight
Oldest Water on Earth Found Deep Underground
2013 Billboard Music Awards: All the Winners!














Comments
2
Subscribe to comments__smooth__Feb 8th 2011 12:33PM
blasphemy.
So they're going regulate who can or cannot use a domain? It may help to prevent squatters, but I don't see this being benificial in the long run.
ICAAN for domains, FCC for content speed... I'm not liking this one bit.
trailerpark1976Feb 8th 2011 7:11PM
It's all about protecting the movie and music industry from the "pirates" and stop another wikileaks from embarrassing the government. It's total crap but the entertainment industry owns a big chunk of the government. Obama, Bush, whoever doesn't care about what's best for the U.S. it's all about lining their own pockets.