NFL and Players Union Take Labor Dispute Bickering to Twitter
According to The New York Times, commissioner Roger Goodell sent an e-mail on Wednesday to his staff saying he'd take a $1 salary (a pay cut of about $10 million) if a lockout occurred. Naturally, it was leaked to the NFL Network, and spread quickly across Twitter. To counter, DeMaurice Smith, executive director of the players union, tweeted that he would work for just 68 cents if an agreement was reached by next Sunday's Super Bowl. Naturally, this online posturing doesn't mean a whole lot in reality, since the commish and the executive director aren't hurting for money, and there's just no way a new collective bargaining agreement could be reached before kickoff in Dallas.
There are two points of contention at the center of the labor struggle. The league wants less revenue sharing among teams and to add two more games to the current 16-game regular season. The players union, of course, wants more revenue sharing among teams and believes a 16-game season is long enough. So far, neither side has budged enough to even come close to signing a new collective bargaining agreement.
Some, like Paul Hicks, executive vice president of communications and government relations for the NFL, believes Twitter and other sites can give an advantage to one side or the other. "You need to sell your idea and use every opportunity you can at a speed that is not generally normal in a business environment." But Doug Allen, a former players union executive, told the Times that he doesn't think this online back-and-forth does much to change the balance of power. "It alters the atmosphere, but I'm not sure it changes the leverage on both sides. It would, if one side were doing it and the other weren't." But a large online presence could sway public opinion, which can be a powerful tool in convincing one side to cave to the other side's demands. That's why the league has created a Super Bowl Twitter aggregation page, and the players union displays a lockdown countdown clock on its site.
Despite all this online bickering, the NFL and the players union how much money would be lost and damage done if a lockout occurred, which means they'll keep thumping their chests on the Internet for another couple months. But in the end, an agreement will be reached, and we'll have football in the fall.






Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Pete Cosey Dead: Chicago Guitar Great and Miles Davis Collaborator Dies at 68
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Michael Grant Dead: Crescent Shield Singer Dies Aged 39














Comments
2
Subscribe to commentsJamesJan 29th 2011 10:05AM
Wait, I don't get it. They're comparing a desktop OS which has been around for years and years and has millions upon millions of users to a phone that has only been around less than a year, isn't very popular, and has limited distribution channels?
There are also more corn fields in the world than there are Veteran license plates in the state of Arizona... what's the point?
JamesJan 29th 2011 10:07AM
This is the most ridiculous group of uneducated, spoiled, and clueless dolts on Twitter right now. Athletes should not be permitted to speak - it generally does nothing but point out how stupid they are. The owners shouldn't be allowed to speak either, it simply points out how out of touch they are.