Study: Electronic Health Records Don't Improve Quality of Patient Care
President Obama has devoted up to $27 billion in federal funds to digitize health records at hospitals across the country, but a new study suggests that he probably shouldn't bother.In the nationwide study, a team of researchers from Stanford University analyzed data from more than 250,000 patient visits between 2005 and 2007. According to their findings, digital record-keeping systems didn't significantly improve the treatment that patients received. "Across a wide range of quality indicators there was no consistent association between having those electronic tools available and providing better quality of care," said Dr. Randall Stafford, who led the research.
Stafford's study comes on the heels of another Stanford report, which found that digitizing paper records alone did little to improve patient quality. This time, Stafford's research included so-called decision support tools, as well. These digital tools are often used to remind doctors to adhere to certain guidelines when treating various conditions. Even this software, however, failed to improve the quality of patient treatment -- a sign, Stafford says, that healthcare policymakers need to look beyond the realm of technology.
"We need to be more realistic about what to expect from electronic health records," Stafford told Reuters. "I believe this study suggests that it is naive to believe that the simple presence of an electronic health record or even these systems with more advanced functionality will by themselves change the quality of care ."
But not everyone is ready to write off electronic health records. In a commentary on Stafford's study, Dr. Clement McDonald and Dr. Swapna Abhyankar of the National Institutes of Health called his findings "dismal." McDonald and Abhyankar countered that many other studies have shown that decision support can significantly improve the quality of patient care, and suggested that the systems Stafford examined may have been immature.





Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Justin Bieber Booed, Gets Standing Ovation at Billboard Music Awards
2013 Billboard Music Awards Best and Worst Dressed
Watch: Kansas Meteorologist Seeks Shelter From Tornado
Two Pilots Fired After Brazilian Pop Star Takes Captain's Seat Mid-Flight
Oldest Water on Earth Found Deep Underground
2013 Billboard Music Awards: All the Winners!
Selena Gomez Leaving Justin Bieber's House: Booty Call Rumors Swirl
Walmart Workers Pessimistic About The Company's Future
South American 'Crazy' Ants Are a Threat in Southern US















Comments
2
Subscribe to commentsDannyJan 26th 2011 3:37PM
It’s actually a pretty old study 2007
http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/167/13/1400
Lipika Samal who used to work at Johns Hopkins Community Physicians while doing her General Internal Medicine Fellowship is in the midst of running a new survey looking at the same information. She’s now at Brigham and Women’s – and feels that having worked at JHCP with a ‘real EMR’ gives her a much better insight into how to understand impacts on clinicians – work load as well as process of care.
BrianMJan 26th 2011 4:38PM
Just cause they are digital does not make them available to the relevant healthcare professional at the time of need. Digitizing is only 1/2 of the problem.