Man Faces Prison for Reading His Wife's E-Mails
Leon Walker recently discovered that his wife was having an affair, after he read some of her e-mails. Doing so, however, may just land him in prison. Last year, Walker reportedly hacked into his wife's Gmail account, using a laptop that the couple shared. He then found out that his wife, Clara, was having an affair with her second husband, who previously had been arrested for beating the woman in front of her child. Leon forwarded the mail to the child's father (Clara's first husband), for fear that more domestic violence could ensue. The father quickly filed an emergency motion to obtain custody of the kid -- and Clara quickly filed a lawsuit against Leon.
Clara's case rests upon a Michigan statute normally used to prosecute crimes like identity or intellectual property theft. The law expressly forbids people from accessing protected computer networks "intentionally and without authorization," which, according to Prosecutor Jessica Cooper, is exactly what Leon did, when he read his wife's e-mails. "The guy is a hacker," Cooper told the Detroit Free Press. "It was password protected, he had wonderful skills, and was highly trained. Then he downloaded them and used them in a very contentious way."
Others, however, aren't entirely convinced that the statute can be applied to this domestic case. "I've been a defense attorney for 34 years and I've never seen anything like this," said defense attorney Leon Weiss. "This is a hacking statute, the kind of statute they use if you try to break into a government system or private business for some nefarious purpose. It's to protect against identity fraud, to keep somebody from taking somebody's intellectual property or trade secrets."
It may even be difficult to call Leon's surveillance "hacking." Clara insists that the computer belonged to her, even though Leon purchased it. In a recent interview with the Free Press, though, Leon claimed that the two shared the laptop as a "family computer," and that his spouse kept all her passwords written in a book next to the device.
The recently divorced couple will head to court on February 7th, where a jury will settle their squabble. If convicted, Leon could face up to five years in prison. But the 33-year old seems confident that he did the right thing by sharing his wife's private e-mails. "I was doing what I had to do," he said. "We're talking about putting a child in danger."



















Comments
12
Subscribe to commentscollprateek.adDec 27th 2010 10:21AM
love is supreme power in the world
timorgDec 27th 2010 2:01PM
If a judge finds him guilty of this, the judge aught to be held and found guilty of violating family privacy.
tana greenDec 27th 2010 8:52PM
It was hacking. Imagine if the wifehad hacked into the husband's account. You all would be screaming for her head.
harrill7Dec 27th 2010 9:25PM
@tana green That is sexist, and the man bought the computer, which had the passwords in a pad laying beside the computer- with zero securit on it. It was his computer. HE BOUGHT THE COMPUTER AND OWNED IT.How about the fact she was breaking the law by breaking her vows? She was in the act of committing a crime, and putting a child at risk, and all you can see is gender. Idiot.
exoticdoc2Dec 27th 2010 8:54PM
That's not hacking. She's just PO'd because she was caught being a skank.
CrimsonrayneDec 28th 2010 5:47AM
@harrill7
CrimsonrayneDec 28th 2010 6:02AM
@harrill7
Totally agree with you harrill7. This has zero to do with gender. Married couples do not have the luxury of secrets. He had just as much right to see her emails as she would have had to see his, its called being MARRIED...everything he owns is hers and everything she owns is his, e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. This luxury also does not apply to children from their parents, this whole "it's my private stuff and you are spying so I am pressing charges" should NEVER apply to families that live together.
There is simply way too much law being forced in to inter-familial relationships...if we keep going the way we are, pretty soon there won't be any sovereignty for families. The only real reason the law should get involved is in cases of abuse, where someone is actually being harmed.
prettyqueeninnyDec 27th 2010 9:28PM
he deseved
SuperLouDec 28th 2010 12:13AM
@exoticdoc2
Vasu MurtiDec 27th 2010 9:56PM
My e-mail and online communications are all being monitored. Whom should I sue?
babynowiDec 27th 2010 9:58PM
NOT GUILTY...next case.
themacwayDec 28th 2010 12:07AM
the kid(s) trump all. sorry if it's not pc enough for all the libs out there. had he not found this out and taken the steps he did...