Slate Thinks Facebook Killed the Christmas Card
Once upon a time, long before the age of e-mail, text messaging and fire, early man used to send these things called "Christmas cards." Every winter, just after the last woolly mammoth had been slain and right before the annual yuletide feast, many humans would pull out their "address books," and begin writing a series of seasonal missives to friends and cave people with whom they hadn't spoken in many, many moons. These letters typically provided generic information about what had transpired among the tribe over the course of the previous year. (Thor made a wheel, little Jenny developed opposable thumbs, etc.) Some would even include pictures. They'd end the letters with a cheery wish of "Merry Christmas," and would send them away on the backs of pigeons. It was an annual rite, and one upon which many relied to keep in touch with their fellow hominids. Then, the Internet happened, and Facebook soon followed. People no longer needed paper to communicate, and, with social networking, they could easily find out what their friends had been up to since last year (or, for that matter, last week). Throughout this technological upheaval, the deeply ingrained Christmas card tradition persevered, thanks in large part to old people and Hallmark. In 2010, though, everything changed. This, you see, was the year that the Christmas card finally died away -- according to Slate, at least.
Granted, Slate has virtually no hard data to support that thesis. In fact, industry analysts expect only a slight decline in holiday mail circulation this year. But anecdotal evidence (read: "personal musings from bored Slate staffers") suggests that in 2010, Christmas card volume dropped off precipitously for many consumers (read: "Slate staffers"). But why? And why now?
Slate offers four potential explanations, ranging from the plausible (tough economic times that discourage even the smallest of postage expenditures) to the outright ridiculous (e-cards). Ultimately, though, it lays most of the blame at the feet of Facebook. According to Slate's theory, the rise of the social network dovetailed perfectly with the dawn of a new breed of Christmas card: one with plenty of family photos, and plenty of impersonal, borderline-solipsistic information about a family's "Very Busy, Very Exciting year."
With Facebook, however, people don't need annual photos to marvel at how much little Jenny has grown. And they don't really need an update on what an individual or her family has been doing all year. "In 2010, people don't need to wait for December to brag," writes Slate's Kate Julian. "They've been doing it all year." It certainly seems like a reasonable, if somewhat obvious theory, and one that our own dearth of Christmas cards would ostensibly support. But it doesn't necessarily imply that the Christmas card is dead, either.
Perhaps it's time for the tradition to undergo yet another transformation -- to move away from the businesslike, and return to the more intimate. Slate's right: no one needs to see family photos or read formulaic letters about what your daughter chose as her major, because Facebook already tells us that. But that's not really a bad thing at all. Instead of mourning the imminent demise of a holiday tradition, we should take this inflection point as an opportunity to breathe new life into the Christmas card, and find new ways to distinguish it from Facebook. Sure, snail mail is slow, and postage isn't free. But a hand-written, personalized letter will always get more attention (and appreciation) than just another empty-hearted Facebook post.
If you have any ideas about how to revolutionize and revitalize the Christmas card, let us know. Our messenger pigeons are on standby.





Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Pete Cosey Dead: Chicago Guitar Great and Miles Davis Collaborator Dies at 68
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Michael Grant Dead: Crescent Shield Singer Dies Aged 39














Comments
8
Subscribe to commentsSally GDec 24th 2010 6:38AM
I agree with you; a real, not-quite-live snail-mail card is something special. I always buy cards made of recycled materials, and often from independent artists/businesses rather than a corporate entity or chain store. Other times I will purchase cards from a nonprofit group whose mission I support, such as UNICEF, the Sierra Club, etc. There were a couple of years when I did postcards—less paper and cheaper postage! Also remember, not everyone is on Facebook—and sometimes you want to have a real, paper photo on the bookshelf, to glimpse as you walk by—not something you can do with FB.
Merry Christmas, all!
SimzeeDec 24th 2010 7:34AM
Video Killed the Radio Star. Lest we forget. hhhmmmmmm
razziDec 24th 2010 8:22AM
Yes! There's nothing nicer than a card at Christmas. Over the year I've made my own. Drawing a picture ,writing the words inside to say Happy Holidays. But this year I ordered cards and used up some I had left from years before. So it does make a differance at this time of year to get cards.Merry Christmas all and a Blessed New Year :)
pd39Dec 24th 2010 11:27AM
email and acces to on-line cards killed the Christmas card long before facebook came along.
DebiDec 24th 2010 11:19AM
The problem with Christmas cards is...people are too busy to bother ,and those that do, all they do is send a generic type card, sign their names and stick it in the mail. For those people I do not hear from from one Christmas to the next, it would be nice to get some kind of news from them, but 90% disappoint so I would rather not even get that signed card..its like someone going through the motions...without any emotional effort put forth. I did not send cards..will wait til after the New Year and send something, with a little info on what is going on. I don't like Facebook, think it should have remained strictly for college aged kids, not people in their 40s and 50s. Come on, folks..your time is over...get back to the program and know it does not make you look cool, it makes you look a bit lame....
AlannDec 24th 2010 11:27AM
@Debi
I'm 75 and enjoy keeping up with friends and family (several older than I) on Facebook. It wouldn't cross my mind to be on Facebook to look "cool"--I don't even know what that means! I've found a number of people on FB whom I'd thought were lost. It's a great way to find out how people are doing, without corresponding with them unless they want to. I don't send e-cards through FB, nor download the FB "app" for sites I already visit anyway. Luckily, we can all decide whether to be on it or not!
AlannDec 24th 2010 11:20AM
At this moment, we have 20 cards strung on dark red yarn across our living room windows, as we've done in the 55 Christmases since we were married. Sure, time was that we'd get 18-20 cards on a single day, but that's when both cards and stamps were a LOT cheaper (a box of Hallmark cards for our first Christmas was $1.25). I order our next-year's cards from a catalog site which has only USA-made cards and great 1/2-price sales. I will NOT buy cards that were made in China, and am disappointed when I receive one that was. When we started having more family news than I could write in every card, I began adding a letter which I keep to one page. This year I sent out 56 cards, and plan to again next year, more or less. This number has gone down over the years too; I love some of the e-cards that are out there, and send a lot of them too.
JimDec 24th 2010 1:29PM
Facebook killed the Christmas Card?!?! I don't think so. I, for one, don't have a Facebook address and don't intend to create one in order to see one of someone else. If people want to send me seasonal greetings or family news they can reach me by snail-mail, (In case you haven't noticed, the USPS has gotten much faster these days.), email, or by phone...NO TEXTING. I refuse to text message information that could just as easily be said in a simple phone call or by email which costs a lot less to boot.