P2P and Online Gaming Pose Risky Problems for Uninformed Parents

When discussing P2P networks, parents should inform kids about the inescapable risks. The most publicized issues relate to the legal repercussions of downloading pirated content. Illegally sharing just one song can result in a five-figure fine and a permanently stained record. File-sharing also remains a primary method for predators and pedophiles to disseminate pornography (particularly of the child variety), and many sites feature potentially dangerous chat rooms. Viruses also present a constant threat.
Parents can disable file-sharing and downloading to prevent these threats, but knowledgeable kids can easily counteract those basic efforts. But, representatives of the music and movie industries, particularly the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), actively combat threatening P2P activities. In conjunction with Childnet International, the IFPI drafted a guide to 'Young People, Music & the Internet,' to "help parents everywhere keep up with the music downloading habits of their children." The IFPI also provides a free program, called Digital File Check, that systematically scans a computer for -- and allows users to immediately delete -- installed file-sharing software. Even more importantly, it also performs the same function for downloaded music, video and image files.
The advent of online gaming introduced a host of dangerous entities to a once benevolent activity. PlayStation, Xbox and Wii all enable networking and connected gaming, a development which has already attracted the attention of predators and stalkers. All three systems provide parental control features, though, but the safety measures differ slightly among the consoles. Each allows parents to restrict browser access, filter inappropriate content, block chatroom activities and incoming messages, disallow purchases, and forbid certain games and movies (based on ratings).
But, aside from those frightening issues, obsession and addiction still remain a significant gaming concern. Even though the Wii may carry a reputation as the most family-friendly console, the Xbox 360 actually provides a unique parental control feature called the Family Timer. The self-explanatory timer serves as the best option for busy parents to specifically limit their child's gaming activity. So, potential consumers (or somewhat oblivious current owners), need to closely examine the step-by-step parental controls that each console has to offer (Sony's PlayStation 3, Nintendo's Wii and Microsoft's Xbox 360) in order to determine which system fulfills a child's individual gaming desires, while simultaneously maintaining their safety (and their parents' peace of mind).





Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
HSBC Plans 14,000 More Job Cuts
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
Hands-on with the Samsung Galaxy S 4 running stock Android 4.2
Taylor Swift Q and A: What Does She Splurge on in Las Vegas?
Ricardo Cerezo, Facing Eviction, Finds $4.85 Million Lottery Ticket
Forever 21 Worker Fired After She Tells Her Traumatic Story















Comments
4
Subscribe to commentspks29733steelDec 12th 2010 10:35AM
That's the fault with online gaming. Before the children could enjoy a computer game (Atari, Genis, Sega, Mattle, Jaguar, etc.) and not be 'online'. Now when your child is gaming without parental controls you might as well place your child into a 'Adult Chatroom'!!
MIchael Mc ManusDec 12th 2010 11:34AM
I live in Las Vegas and hope this fails.
Will kill my economy. And my tax base.
brandonDec 12th 2010 1:09PM
This article seems like its written by the IFPI themselves and contains no neutral information on any of its subject matter.
The title of this article might as well be "Are you scared of the internet? Read this article to increase your ignorance!"
endlessresortDec 12th 2010 4:17PM
Wasn't there something in the constitution/bill of rights that said "Punishment for a crime will not exceed how bad the actual crime was", or something along those lines? A five figure fine for downloading a song worth maybe 80 cents? There's something VERY wrong there.