First Trial Over Video Game Console Mods Begins

The trial is bound to be controversial for several reasons. First, the primary piece of evidence in the case against Crippen is a video of the defendant performing the mod for an undercover agent. The defense is disputing the use of the video on the grounds that it was made in violation of California state privacy laws, and because investigators have edited the recording down to two minutes. The full video is unavailable to both the defense and the jury. (The investigator that recorded the meeting claims to have lost the original material to a computer crash.)
More importantly, though, the outcome of the trial will have a significant impact on the rights of consumers to alter the products they've purchased. Judges have already ruled that Crippen cannot mount a defense based on fair use. His lawyer, Callie Glanton Steele, maintains that the modding procedure is not too different from jailbreaking an iPhone, though -- something that was explicitly approved in a recent ruling by the U.S. Copyright Office. While the hack does allow for the potential to run pirated games, Crippen was not selling pirated material. He was offering services to modify a privately owned piece of consumer electronics. The modification offers benefits beyond simply pirating games, such as playing user-created titles, backing-up games purchased legally and playing titles purchased from overseas.
The charges of violating the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA carry a maximum sentence of three years in jail.





Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Justin Bieber Booed, Gets Standing Ovation at Billboard Music Awards
2013 Billboard Music Awards Best and Worst Dressed
Watch: Kansas Meteorologist Seeks Shelter From Tornado
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
Selena Gomez Leaving Justin Bieber's House: Booty Call Rumors Swirl
Two Pilots Fired After Brazilian Pop Star Takes Captain's Seat Mid-Flight















Comments
2
Subscribe to commentsbigclarkie99Nov 30th 2010 6:25PM
How is this different from getting paid to modify someones car? The modder in that case wouldn't be held responsible if the owner of the car used it to out run cops and smuggle drugs, why should the modder in this case be held responsible for the actions of his clients?
???Dec 1st 2010 2:28AM
@(Unverified) Because the content industry will do anything and everything in its power to make sure only they earn money off their products.