Hot on HuffPost Tech:

See More Stories
AOL Tech

Facebook's Overhauled Groups Ripe for Abuse and Embarrassment

Facebook Groups
As is expected anytime Facebook changes something or unveils a new feature, the overhauled Groups is becoming a target of a backlash. Unlike the whining that so often follows these redesigns, however, the most recent reaction seems to have a legitimate basis. Shortly after the new, simpler Groups tool launched, Mark Zuckerberg, TechCrunch founder (and new member of the AOL family) Michael Arrington, and Mahalo founder Jason Calacanis found themselves added to a group called NAMBLA. For those of you unaware, NAMBLA is the acronym for the North American Man Boy Love Association, an advocacy group for pedophilia.

The NAMBLA Facebook group has no affiliation with the actual organization, though. PC World reports it was set up by one of Arrington's friends, Jon Fisher, to highlight a glaring issue with Groups: friends don't need your permission to add you to one. Fisher was friends with Arrington and Calacanis on Facebook, and was able to add them to the group without their consent. Arrington, troubled by the fact that he could be added to any group without being asked to opt-in, then added Zuckerberg to the group, presumably hoping it would drive home the point better than a simple e-mail missive.
There are some limitations to the group feature. You can't add people to a group if you're not friends with them, and are not a member of the group yourself. After being added, a person can leave the group, and prevent themselves from being added again in the future. Still, the potential for embarrassment or worse is a serious problem.

A Facbeook spokesperson told PC World, in the company's alarmingly typical, dismissive manner, "If you don't trust someone to look out for you when making these types of decisions on the site, we'd suggest that you shouldn't be friends on Facebook." We think the ability to confirm being added to a Group is an essential feature if there is even an option to make a group publicly viewable. It might add a layer of complexity that Facebook hoped to avoid with the Groups overhaul, but the possibility of being added to a group with which you'd rather not be associated necessitates the change.

Tags: facebook, facebookgroups, groups, privacy, SocialNetworking, top, web

Comments

19