California Law Makes Online Impersonation a Crime, Worries Political Parodists
The bill is intended to strengthen the penalties against cyberbullying, exemplified by the case of "Myspace Mom" Lori Drew and the suicide of 13-year-old Megan Meier in 2006. (The case ended in Drew's acquittal.) Anti-corporate activists like The Yes Men, however, are worried that the wording of the bill would make their brand of parody demonstrations a legal target.
Like libel law, SB 1411 states that "an impersonation is credible if another person would reasonably believe, or did reasonably believe, that the defendant was or is the person who was impersonated."
Mike Bonanno of The Yes Men told IDG News in an e-mail that "corporations and their political cronies...[could use] this law to attack activists who are truly exercising free speech." The Yes Men frequently set up spoof websites, distribute fake newspapers and impersonate business people to spread their political views. Since corporations are counted as legal persons in the United States, it is reasonable to assume that the new law could be used against their kind of activism.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has called the bill "dangerous" and "not needed," saying that it would limit entities like The Yes Men and "Leroy Stick," the guy behind the BPGlobalPR Twitter account, which sprang up in response to the Gulf oil spill disaster. EFF claims that "identity correction" activism "depends on initial credibility, just as it also depends on prompt exposure," and that the law misses the point in trying to protect free speech with the credibility clause.






Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Justin Bieber Booed, Gets Standing Ovation at Billboard Music Awards
2013 Billboard Music Awards Best and Worst Dressed
Watch: Kansas Meteorologist Seeks Shelter From Tornado
Two Pilots Fired After Brazilian Pop Star Takes Captain's Seat Mid-Flight
Oldest Water on Earth Found Deep Underground
2013 Billboard Music Awards: All the Winners!
South American 'Crazy' Ants Are a Threat in Southern US
Selena Gomez Leaving Justin Bieber's House: Booty Call Rumors Swirl
Walmart Workers Pessimistic About The Company's Future















Comments
6
Subscribe to commentsMitchOct 3rd 2010 11:56AM
Free speech/1st Amendment wingnuts should read up on the defition of "harmful intent". If someone impersonating me does so with the intent harm or intimidate , or my family, I am going to react to eliminate the problem by whatever means I deem nbcessary. I will not wait for the Court to decide whether or not my reaction is justified. To me my reaction it is necessary to stop the impersonater from further harming or intimidating me. Too much of this discussion revolves around what the advocates or Courts beleive about the constitionality of the 1st Amendment. This law, rightfully, is centered on what the victims of the act experience and provides some rules that clearly tell online predators and ID thieves that their acts are not without consequence.
sandrabranumOct 3rd 2010 12:30PM
Too many peopole are trying to take away our rights by destroying the Bill of Rights -- the courts, the White House, what will replace The Twin Towers, Rosie O'Donnel (gun control), etc. We need to stand up and protect our rights before it's too late. Remember to vote this Nov -- that is one, way you can tell the Government exactly how you feel,
Hugh HefnerOct 3rd 2010 8:40PM
A very large amount of people try to impersonate someone intelligent while online.
STOct 3rd 2010 8:48PM
Hey Governator when are you going to blow up the moon to stop PMS?
Hello Den DenOct 3rd 2010 9:49PM
Does that apply to law inforcement impersonating 14 yr old girls on line baiting cyberworld dirtbaqs. LOL
TonyOct 3rd 2010 9:53PM
Do those functioning morons who pass this law really think it will do any good.