One-Third of U.S. Families Live Without Landline Phones, Report Says

A quick glance at some comparative statistics from the past few years reveals just how drastically some American households have transitioned from landline to wireless. In 2003, the Center for Disease Control's National Health Interview Survey began tracking wireless substitution rates, as mobile phones had already become ubiquitous. At that time, just 2.8-percent of adults and 2.9-percent of children in the U.S. were living with only a wireless phone and no landline. By 2005, though, one out of every ten families had cut their lines. And, as Bazinet's report proves, this trend is showing no signs of decelerating anytime soon. [From: BusinessInsider, via: Textually]





Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Did the Diva Diss Her Ex-Hubby With Revealing New Song?
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death














Comments
24
Subscribe to commentsKoleckaiAug 19th 2010 5:11PM
Don't blame them. It is an unnecessary and redundant cost. I cancelled the home landline as all 5 people in the household have their own cellphone and we have a skype account for long distance if needed. The cancellation means $420.00 a year saved.
Joshua FruhlingerAug 20th 2010 12:36AM
Exactly. I got rid of my land line when I got rid of DSL.
SophindaAug 20th 2010 7:15AM
OKAY, all you cost savvy citizens, so you thought it was a good move getting rid of your land lines? Not. Consider this, YOUR LAND LINE IS YOUR KEY TO YOUR PRIVACY, EMERGENCY AND A SIGN OF STABILITY. Being tethered is not as bad as it seems as in a power outage. Did you know that if you loose electricity your land line is still working? Most anything you fill out these days that include a phone number asks for your "primary" or "prefered contact number" phone number. A short time ago, thanks to my land line being accidentally knocked off the hook and me not knowing it, the person that stole my wallet was unable to use my ATM card to make purchases. Most important, land lines will not drop that phone call from your interview telling you the job is yours, your loan has been approved or someone has been in an accident.
Just get the basic package, and think of it as insurance or a life preserver.
KoleckaiAug 20th 2010 12:12PM
@Uneed2kno Everyone's situations are different. Just want to say that Federal Law dictates that emergency 911 and reverse 911 calls are allowed to complete even if service is not supplied to the landline. I have very reliable cellular service where I live and have not dropped a call in two years or lost service in a power outage.
Todd LeBaronAug 20th 2010 1:31PM
I agree totally...I also much prefer the audio qualoty of a landline over cell or wireless...so many calls to people on these other phones I've had to ask them to repeat themselves constantly...kind of defeats the purpose of the whole thing with interminable dropouts in the signal. I've had cordless phones drop on me in an instant with a power outage...another solid reminder that a landline is the best for me. I certainly understand the want for mobile; I have a Tracfone myself, but I use it almost exclusively just to phone home to see what we need at the store...or to let someone know I've arrived where I'm going safely...or to make sure someone is going to be somewhere on time...no hour long conversations. Mobile is fine for quick calls like I've mentioned but the quality and security of a landline is unbeatable in my book!
teshapalmerOct 7th 2010 1:42PM
@Uneed2kno Wireless carriers must allow 911 access even to cell phones that are not currently active. That's why donated phones are used by women's shelters ~ so they can call a 911 operator in an emergency. If I'm not mistaken, it's VOIP services like Vonage that aren't required to provide this service. My 9 year old carries my last cell phone so he can use it in an emergency. He has no other abilities on the phone except to call 911 since the phone isn't subscribed to a wireless carrier. I know it works because I've called it from that phone a few times to be certain he could access them. I've found that the operators are very happy to confirm the call is connected as long as you tell them up front it's a non-emergency.
Also, if the power is off and you use a cordless phone on your landline, your telephone cannot be used. If your phone lines are down, your landline cannot be used. In the 19 years I've been using a cell phone, I can only count a handful of times it couldn't be used because of a service related issue.
I look at my cell phone as being my primary phone line because I can not only use it on the road in an emergency, I can also call the telephone company to let them know my landline is down or my electric company to tell them my power is out.
As for the paperwork issue, I list my cell phone as the primary number to call and my home number as the secondary and I haven't had an issue yet.
ValAug 20th 2010 8:36AM
I've been wondering if I can get rid of my land line while keeping my DSL ... I just haven't felt like trying to get through to a human at AT&T to find out. I figure I can't anyway, gotta keep that number, right?
The ONLY people who call my land line anymore besides my parents and in-laws ... who have every cell phone number anyway ... are polls, senators, people looking for donations, etc. NOBODY valid calls my landline, so it's completely redundant and costing me unneccessary money.
ValAug 20th 2010 8:37AM
Oh, and by the way, for my "stability" issues, I do have a utility bill and have owned the same home for 15 years. So I dont' need a land line to prove my "tether".
Pks29733Aug 20th 2010 9:21AM
I've owned cell phones since the early '80's' and ALWAYS kept my 'land-line' (regulare wired home telephone). My home phone service is just 'basic' in that my cell gives me the 'nation-wide' free long distance. But my home's wired 'land line' is my protection in that I can call 911 and the instantly know my location (my home's physical 'street address') so if I call in an emercency (say a fire or medical) and I'm not able to complete the call (pass out, over taken by smoke) they can send emergency services directly to my actual home address. On celluar calls, they can only get a guess of my real call location. So If my homes on fire, I call and suddenly pass out, 10 to 1 I'll be dead and my home burnt to the ground. But wait, I saved money by dropping my landline. Don't do it!
Kelin SometimeAug 20th 2010 1:05PM
If your home's on fire, what are you still doing inside your burning home! Running to a phone inside a burning building is such a terrible idea. Run outside and borrow someone's cellphone.
CandyAug 20th 2010 9:23AM
We have been without a landline for at least 4 years. Even with 2 young children. We have been using our cel phone numbers as our "Primary contact number" for all that time, and longer. If my bank needs to contact me for fraudulent card use - bingo - I don't have to be home to recieve the call. We also had to get DSL when we moved to a rural area, and we don't have a landline still. The house is not even wired for a landline. Landlines are expensive, dust collecting DINOSAURS.
kathryn murdockAug 20th 2010 9:35AM
@Candy
Land lines may be expensive - although most phone companies have bare bone accounts - here's one reason to keep them.
During an earthquake - and no matter where you live there can be an earthquake - cell phones do not work except for some distance from you- at least 25-100 miles. Another person pointed out -when electricity goes land lines still work.
careenAug 20th 2010 9:34AM
You know it's interesting that people think landlines are safer for emergencys. The truth is having both a cell and a land line is ideal if you can afford it. When hurricane Katrina hit we were unable to reach a friend for three days until a text came through. Texting was our only form of communication for more than nine days. When disaster struck it really changed my mind about texting and cell phones.
KoleckaiAug 20th 2010 1:36PM
A barebones telephone line from Verizon in California is $35.00 a month. Well $21.50 plus taxes and fees. Of course, if you qualify for subsidized phone, you can get it for much lower. My wife and I make enough money so that we are comfortable but we don't quality for subsidized anything.
At this point, my wife wants to go back to school. Since we don't qualify for subsidized anything, that is an additional $600 out of our pocket every month. Cancel phone we don't use, cancel gardener, cancel this and that. That is how we make our budget work without having her put off her dream.
I don't feel my family is less safe. In fact since each of my three teenagers has a cellphone, I know they can contact me when they need to. I know the police can track the phone if they go missing. I feel better letting them walk the half mile to the movies (as a group) and so forth. I know that if there is an accident we don't have to look for payphones or try to get to a stationary phone in the house. I know that if someone cuts our landline (happened 4 times in 3 years) that we can still call for help.
They don't interrupt with dinner or family times because we have rules about that. No texting or talking on the phone during dinner. No food in bedrooms. No talking or texting during board games or movie time. They also have strict limits on when they can talk on the phone and they know that I can track their activity in real time online.
I live in earthquake country but not worried about a landline for calling out. Though we do have a battery powered CB which is a lot more useful than a phone line in a disaster. The family that needs to know what is going on is local and we know where to go to meet up with supplies if needed. Cellphones are also a lot more handy during the seasonal forest fires we have which burn lines and landlines do go out once the tower they are on melts and crashes to the ground. When my wife was stuck at work behind the evacuation lines of the Station Fire last year, I was secure in knowing I could contact her on her phone while the phone for the animal rescue she works at went dead.
Pretty happy with my choice. My wife will be able to go to school next year and eventually increase her annual pay by 40%. I don't have unnecessary bills and I sleep soundly knowing my family can get a hold of me in any situation.
RiognachAug 20th 2010 9:50AM
I will never be without a land line. We have cell phones, but we will keep the land line. When the towers went down 9 years ago, we were able to reach family and friends who also had land lines and learned they were safe. People with cell phones were frantic because they would not work, and used our phone to find out if loved ones were OK. It's worth the extra monthly cost to have the extra security.
SophindaAug 20th 2010 1:54PM
@Riognach Thank you for the positive feedback. A quick follow through. I neglected to mention, Stability and a land line came up at a conference I attended.OVERHEARD " A land line indicates a person is available, period. In the future most will get rid of the land line to accommodate the cost of everything else people don't really need but marketing will tell them they have to buy. By then the only people calling land lines will be bill collectors, telemarketers, and other people you really don't want to speak with."
And I am not slamming cell phones at all. I just think people should be aware there should always be aware that some options are necessary. You may be able to reach that cordless phone and need it for the one call you don't want to miss. Each time you purchase another me, me, me produce you give someone else a little piece of control. I'll I guarentee you if you ever paid a bill by cell phone, and your land line is disconnedted, the number one reason some have cancelled their land line, i.e. bill collectors, they will eventually be calling you. Oh yes, and did you know this. When a company sells your account to a collecter, thanks to paying the bill over the cell phone, they have everything they need to extract payments. Hint: never answer "yes" if someone on the other end asks is this (insert your name here) that to some collectors that would be your confirmation to giving them permission to take your money.
AngelaAug 20th 2010 10:10AM
Why is the Center for Disease Control tracking wireless substitution rates? Anywho, I guess if you have 5 people in your family and you pay for 5 cell phones, why bother with a landline? I have a landline and always hope to have one. By having a stationery phone, it keeps outside interruptions in their place. Having dinner? If the phone in the other room rings, you can choose to leave your family dinner table and get the phone, or you can choose to leave the outside interruption until later. If you have a teenager, they can talk on the phone in the kitchen, and you can limit their phone time. Remember when the phone rang and everybody in the house raced to answer it? Now, everybody talks or texts any and all the time. Cell phones actually promote less discipline and responsibility for our kids and especially our teens. A cell phone for emergency use is one thing. And yes, cell phones are convenient. But what is the REAL price we pay, including a loss of family communication and personal interaction skills, for that convenience?
wtre428476Aug 20th 2010 10:13AM
i'M RETIRED BELL EMP JUST ABOUT FREE
KerriAug 20th 2010 10:21AM
Funny enough reading this article and comments has inspired me to get a landline. My husband and I recently moved from Brooklyn, NY to Los Angeles, CA and have not gotten a landline, we both use our cells for all calls anyway and have not seen the need for one, now I think it can't hurt I mean we do live in the earthquake capital of America so I'm thinking it may be worth it to have one...just in case.
KoleckaiAug 20th 2010 12:18PM
@cherub I live in the Los Angeles area. During the last major earthquake (Northridge, 1994), landlines were worthless for two days. All you got was an "All circuits are busy error". I didn't have a cell phone then and luckily we didn't need assistance because we wouldn't have gotten any. The local governments advise that you plan to be without assistance for 7 days after a major earthquake.