Fancy Orchestra-Goers Disturbed by Lowly Text Marketing
The New York Times, our favorite text of culture snobbery, published an article yesterday entitled "Orchestras Seek BFF by Cellphone Texts." Despite the curiously nerdy headline, the piece was about concert-goers who are disturbed by the fact that orchestras and their attendant marketing teams have realized that these things called cell phones can be used to advertise their brands. The article tells the story of a New York Philharmonic concert in Central Park, during which the audience was given the option of choosing the encore that the soloist would perform. After sending in their votes, audience members received a text reply that offered a discount on the performer's CD and a suggestion to become a fan on Facebook.Horror of horrors! What the Times calls "incident" is all-too-commonplace in venues less venerable. The younguns and the hoi polloi have grown accustomed, with varying comfort, to the intrusions of marketing campaigns through e-mails, text messages and, lately, smartphone apps. And it seems that elite entertainment, which we'd wager are struggling just as much as any other sector in this economy, are no longer willing to thumb their noses at cell phone spam if it means any kind of positive return.
Of course, Daniel Wakin, the author of the Times article, may not be familiar with lower forms of entertainment like, say, 'American Idol'; he writes that SMS marketing has been utilized by "charities, restaurants, airlines and museums" -- as opposed to TV shows, Coca-Cola and Burger King. (Or does BK fall under the "restaurant" category?) Or perhaps Wakin is just writing for the older, moneyed readership, who may be surprised to learn that when you give your cell phone number to a business, they're likely to use it to sell you something.
Hey, we're not defending text-message marketing in the slightest. Unsolicited texts are deeply annoying, and, depending on your service plan, could impact your monthly bill. Wakin notes that not every orchestral company has turned to the Dark Side, including the Atlanta Symphony, which chooses to delete its cache of cell numbers after audiences have voted for their encore. Some companies haven't decided to exploit their audience due to cost constraints; as a spokeswoman for the Cleveland Orchestra told Wakin, "For something like Bud Light or the New York Yankees to do it, that's part of their marketing budget." But not so with Cleveland.
So it's a bit of a trade-off. Do we let orchestras financially deteriorate, or do we accept the spam that may keep them afloat another season? Though, it might appear that the New York Philharmonic, at least, has some cash to burn: Wakin noted in an article last week that Lorin Maazel, the company's previous music director, earned $3.3 million in his final season. [From: New York Times]





The List #0147: Escape a Car Underwater
Visit the Maldive Islands Before It's Too Late
Reptiles Make Home in UK Man's Cable Box
Springtime Budget-Busters -- Savings Experiment
Is This Woman Too Pretty To Work?
Mariah Carey Suffers Wardrobe Malfunction on Good Morning America
Distraught Mom Becomes Face of Oklahoma Storm
The Story Behind Hairspray
H&M's Plus-Size Model Jennie Runk Says She Chose To Gain Weight
Amanda Bynes Arrested, Undergoes Psychiatric Evaluation--See the Shocking Mugshot!














Comments
2
Subscribe to commentsShaneJul 23rd 2010 2:14PM
The author misses the point that this is no SPAM being sent to the cell phones. The people in the audience opted-in to the campaign and were sent relevant follow up messages. They can opt out at any time.
The orchestra used text message marketing as it is supposed to be used. They engaged the audience and provided information such as the Facebook page and discounts. Who would be mad with that?
JamesJul 24th 2010 1:01PM
This IS Spam.
Unless the orchestra clearly stated that people were opting in when they voted, this is nothing more than a bait and switch tactic. Voting is NOT opting in, and unless it is clearly explained that way it is considered spam.
They could have avoided all of this simply by sending a reply message to the vote with an OPT-IN to receive further discounts and notices. This would have dispelled the feel of a deceptive marketing practice and allowed people to feel they were being invited into the program rather than hauled in by a common bait and switch scheme.
This is most definitely NOT how text marketing is "supposed to be used." And I believe the reaction was less of cultural snobbery than it was of resentment for employing such a practice, particularly to an orchestral consumer market which tends to be small and exclusive, but very devoted.
J. Guertin
President, Practical Text Marketing
http://practicaltext.com