New Bill Grants Fed Power to Shut Down the Web
In the event of a national emergency, the bill would grant the power to control, and even shut down, large swaths of the Internet to the National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications (NCCC), a new office created within the DHS by the PCNAA. The legislation has garnered support from Senators Jay Rockefeller and Olympia Snowe who proposed similar powers last August, but it's bound to run into serious opposition from tech lobbyists, privacy groups and those who wish to limit the power of the federal government.
While the need to address issues of cybersecurity before, in the words of Senator Snowe, we experience a "cyber 9/11" is undeniable, there is serious cause for concern with the rather dense bill. For one, the language is often extremely broad and any company that "relies on... information infrastructure" in the U.S. would be subject to control by the NCCC. The law would also create additional bureaucratic obstacles for Homeland Security, the Defense Department and other offices that deal with domestic intelligence. It would also fall to the NCCC to monitor private websites and businesses to determine their "security status." Almost as worrisome as the potential for abuse of power by the government though is the immunity from civil suits granted to businesses. In the event of an "incident related to a cyber vulnerability," if the company has complied with federal standards plaintiffs will be unable collect damages related to economic losses.
On the plus side, the legislation does include specific language that bars the NCCC from ordering warrantless surveillance of broadband customers. We suppose that is a vast improvement over the last eight years of domestic spying ambiguity. [From: CNET, Via: Huffington Post]





Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Justin Bieber Booed, Gets Standing Ovation at Billboard Music Awards
2013 Billboard Music Awards Best and Worst Dressed
Watch: Kansas Meteorologist Seeks Shelter From Tornado
Two Pilots Fired After Brazilian Pop Star Takes Captain's Seat Mid-Flight
Oldest Water on Earth Found Deep Underground
2013 Billboard Music Awards: All the Winners!
Selena Gomez Leaving Justin Bieber's House: Booty Call Rumors Swirl
Walmart Workers Pessimistic About The Company's Future
South American 'Crazy' Ants Are a Threat in Southern US















Comments
26
Subscribe to commentsjohnJun 18th 2010 8:28PM
What emergency could possibly require shutting the internet down nationwide?
How much more ignorant can LIEberman get? Does he know that the USA is home to an overwhelming majority of the internet? If it gets shut down here, there would be serious worldwide consequences.
If this bill gets passed, we can pretty much say good-bye to any notions of freedom on the internet.
sarahmartin111Jun 20th 2010 7:40AM
what emergency?? Lieberman & Obuma have screwed up so bad they have to set the stage to cut the public off from knowing what's going on so they can reach their goal... one world order. This was what Obama focused on in college. If you don't believe me... then google "obama one world order studies college" & see for yourself. They are all a bunch of greedy corrupt ignorant politicians.
DaveJun 21st 2010 2:25PM
Revolution would threaten the existing government. Ending all real communication at such a time would ensure victory for the status quo.
carrie pachecoJun 25th 2010 5:16PM
Transformers the Revenge...Part 3 July 2011...
Ying WooJun 18th 2010 8:33PM
Wow, downright scary stuff dude.
Lou
www.Anonymous-VPN.de.tc
DavidJun 18th 2010 9:09PM
Now that is just insane, obama wants to take over the world and by shutting down the internet he can stop a lot of people from finding out what he is up to.
RowedaheliconJun 18th 2010 9:19PM
Not Obama, Liberman wants to be able to shut it down so people can stop looking up on how bad Liberman is.
GJun 19th 2010 8:47AM
This is scary stuff. I don't care what your politics are.... This ever expanding government needs to stop meddling in our lives.
wqewqeJun 19th 2010 1:32PM
The USA does not own the internet. Top level domain name servers and routers can be run from anywhere on the planet. The USA can shutdown and control American networks, but the world will go on right around us.
jfca440Jun 21st 2010 3:13PM
Thats great, but what country are you from?
mccollunskyJun 20th 2010 1:29AM
Uh not a great plan that's insane what kind of President is he?
William CarrJun 20th 2010 4:23PM
You DO realize this isn't Obama's idea, right?
dhfabianJun 20th 2010 2:35AM
For years now, ultra-conservatives such as Sen. Lieberman (and Chinese authorities) have hoped to find ways to censor the Internet. Lieberman has actually made quite a list of bizarre proposals, some of which have been too extreme for even those on the right. Keep in mind how far former President Bush
actually got with this reactionary agenda, primarily via his Dept. Homeland Security.
And David, mccollunsky, etc.: As pointed out, President Obama has no intentions of imposing political censorship. That -- as fairly recent history shows -- is a solidly Republican strategy (It's for our own good, you know...).
nemarollerJun 22nd 2010 12:23PM
Conservative from a Leftist viewpoint maybe, but truly not a conservative.
gregstrmsJun 26th 2010 9:22AM
Lieberman has been a long time democrat all his life and is now an independent, never a Republican. He is no conservative. Us Republicans are for a very weak limited, small federal government as the Constitution states and as our founders intended. See we are called the United STATES .States came together in an alliance. now democrats and their national media have steadlily expanded federal government size and power for the last 120 years. Yet you democrats think it is us Republicans/conservatives who did it. NO . Obama is president and he is for regulating the Internet as are all Democrats. Obama has banned oil drilling which will wreck thousands of lives in Southeastern Louisiana . Obama and the Democrats have put in a banking law/regulation that restricts banks from lending to businesses so that's why we have high unemployment and a recession. Just 1 law can do that. Obama and Democrats r in power and they are the ones passing bills .no conservative/Republican would put any bill or any conservative bill that would dismantle these crippling government regulaions because democrats who control Congress and Obama would stop that bill.
SethJun 20th 2010 2:31AM
There are definitely evil motives behind this.
It defies logic. In a national emergency you want to have more lines of communication open, not shut them down.
An analogy would be: turning off all phone services in the U.S. because somebody called and made a bomb threat somewhere.
And what would a "cyber 9-11" look like? In case no one has noticed - people don't die on the internet.
Sounds to me like certain people who run the world are sore that there's still a frontier where freedom of speech and information exists.
I suggest we all pick up our phones and start educating Washington on why this is such a dangerous proposal.
dominicJun 20th 2010 9:55AM
The day that President Obama comes out directly and says he supports these actions, is the day I leave the Democratic Party....until then, it's just a lot of right-wing Republican-(BS), and you can take that to the bank!!
sean murryJun 20th 2010 8:13PM
this another take over by the libs in govenment,now if this thing passes we lose more freedom.
William CarrJun 20th 2010 4:24PM
LIEberman isn't an Liberal. It's funny that you would blame the Left for his whacko ideas.
I wondered why anyone would need this when I read the headline, until I saw Lieberman and Snowe were promoting it.
Then I knew all I needed to know.
TrevorJun 20th 2010 4:46PM
I just enjoy the graphic of a European plug when the article is talking about an American bill. Scary stuff though.