Real-Life Hoverboard Floats in the Air, Doesn't Do Much Else

But we jest. The board and its pedestal contain electromagnets to elevate the board, and a laser system to keep it in place -- yet, alas, you won't be able to use it to go air-bending under Griff's Extend-o Bat. Besides being an aesthetically faithful replica of the original prop, there's not much more to the thing. So, we have to wonder how we would classify this objet. It's not really functional, or intended to be interactive, so we can't call it design. If it's art, is it trying to say something about '80s economic exuberance or our current culture of looking back? Or is it about the irony of a gizmo that's meant to soar through the air, but is confined to the gallery space? Probably not. It's still hot, though. (And, then again, do Hoverboards need a reason?) Check out a video of the Hoverboard, lazily levitating in place, after the break. [From: Fubiz, via: NOTCOT]





Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Pete Cosey Dead: Chicago Guitar Great and Miles Davis Collaborator Dies at 68
A Journey To The Hottest Place On Earth: Dallol Ethiopia














Comments
11
Subscribe to commentsAllieMay 27th 2010 8:06PM
Now if they would only invent the time machine! I NEED A TIME MACHINE!!!!!
DesignatedshopperMay 27th 2010 10:36PM
Me too!
al schraderMay 28th 2010 5:15AM
I actually discovered the graviton particle - the thing that causes gravity.
I don't know how to control it, only it's properties. Being able to control graviton particles would make building a floating board a cake walk. Right now CERN is testing the graviton in the $10 billion Large Hadron Collider in Geneva, Switzerland.
I have better equipment than CERN, so is simply a matter of time....Alfred-
SundayMay 27th 2010 10:21PM
Cool! They should make furniture that hovers so that we could vacuum underneath it with no problem. It would also be able to move easily so you could change up the room whenever you want. It wouldn't hover while your sitting on it though. Just when you would need it to - press a button on a remote and *poof* it hovers! lol
majorg1000May 27th 2010 11:24PM
Furniture that hovers?...C'mon, get real...they will invent self vacuuming carpet before we ever see floating furniture!...Sheesh!
kngtrk2May 28th 2010 12:08AM
What about a "Hover bed"...Think of the comfort!
Rick BadmanMay 28th 2010 2:14AM
A hoverboard would use a powerful energy source like one in a backpack or a small injection reactor to generate the double-field motive system. The outer field would displace the electromagnetic field of the earth and also ionize the air and surfaces while the inner field would repel against the outer field and levitate the board. If a person falls off of the board which will levitate between one centimeter to ten centimeters above a surface, the board will turn off the fields and fall to the ground.
The two basic types of hoverboards would be the regular and "powered" boards. The regular ones would be like regular skateboards only with adouble-field motive systems and not wheels. At least cracks in the sidewalks or potholes on roads would be so rough. The powered ones would be either the "continued mometum" type that will keep traveling at the speed the rider reaches on his final push-off or the "speed controlled" ones that will be able to glide forward at between 3 mph and 120 mph for those with foot restraints so that the rider doesn't fall off. If an injection reactor is used to generate the fields, a person could ride from the United States to England if he is willing to stand for around 30 hours. At least the speed controlled ones will be able to brake just by dialing back the speed to zero. It won't be a sudden stop or else the rider may be thrown off of the board.
Water can be ionized to produce a surface to levitate above. That is why the boards in the movie would have to glide above the water as they did if the boards were functional. In the future, hoverboards will be expensive if they use reactors. The backpack energy supply boards will be much less expensive. But unless the powerpack is much more powerful than the ones available today, the range might be 2 to 12 hours on a charge, depending on the speed of the board. The nukes may cost more than a luxury sports car and be half as fast as they are. But they will allow riders to glide around the world. The ones with backpacks may cost less than $2000 which is expensive. But for an afternoon of levitated fun and recharging times as fast as five minutes if flywheel storage systems are used, hoverboards will be worth the price. In fact, hoverboard races will be televised in the future once they achieve the higher speeds. The riders will have to have helmets and "scrape suits" that will protect them if they fall from their boards or collide with others and thewalls.
geezer357May 28th 2010 2:25AM
You got a wild imagination Rick.
Joe Papierz JrMay 28th 2010 2:32AM
I don't think any of the ideas mentioned in the comments are practical or will work for personal use. Mostly because of cost and weight if the principles argued will even work. Nuclear power is out of the picture for reasons that should be ovbious. If I'm not mistaken, we already have a non-nuclear commercial application operating at Disney World to transport visitors between hotels, from hotel to Welcome Center, and from the parking lot to the Welcome Center / Hotels. It's smooth, fast and quiet. I love it.
AndiMay 28th 2010 4:07AM
I feel slightly smarter after reading Ricks comment :D
Oh just to get it out of the way (cause you know its coming!)
We would HAVE hoverboards now if it wasn't for Obama and his horrible healthcare bill!
and
I am a lonely millionaire, please someone believe I am looking for love in AOL comments and be dim enough to click on my link.
heatherMay 28th 2010 9:03AM
OMG, can you imagine it. People would be smashing into each other in the sky, it's bad enough we have teenage drivers who can manage who drive a car without killing the innocent because they think they are invincible and immortal! Check out the news about the teenagers that drove into a pole or tree this morning, and listen to what they were doing, AARRGGH , why don't they raise the damn driving age, and put them through intense training. What is wrong with this country, they let give license to kill to these infants. Wake up.