Journalists Start '48 HR' Magazine, CBS Cries Foul
What began as an innocent bar-room hypothetical conversation soon became a reality -- and now, it's become the centerpiece of a brewing legal storm.Back in April, journalists Matthew Honan, Sarah Rich and Alexis Madrigal were drinking together at a San Francisco bar, when they suddenly found themselves wondering about whether it'd be possible to start a new magazine over the course of a single weekend. Ideas were thrown around, and announcements trickled their way down the social media pipeline. Within the course of two days, the troika found themselves with over 1,500 submitted pieces of original writing, photography and illustrations for their maiden issue, the theme of which was "hustle." By the end of the weekend, they finalized their first issue (or "issue zero," as they called it), and printed it under the name '48 HR: Hustle.' In an editor's note, the group proudly proclaimed its collective determination to prove "that it doesn't take a bunch of money and lawyers to make something great."
It may not have taken a lot of money, but it'll likely take a few lawyers if the trio wants to continue their venture any further. That's because bigwigs at CBS soon caught wind of the project, and decided that the title of '48 HR' was a bit too close to its own show '48 Hours.' On May 11th, CBS assistant general counsel Lauren Marcello sent a cease-and-desist letter to the publishers, claiming the network's rights to the '48 Hours' trademark, and warning them, "Your use is unlawful and constitutes trademark infringement, dilution and unfair competition."
So far, the magazine has sold about 1,000 copies at $10 a pop, which, as the New York Times puts it, "will be split in a complicated hippie-ish formula" among the participants. The entire controversy, then, seems to be just another tragic instance of an insecure playground bully huffing and puffing over what amounts to corporate lunch money. Besides, as Honan says, "Tweaking what is already there at the behest of lawyers seems very contrary to the spirit of the project." He also admits, however, that "the unfortunate truth" may be that "you can't do anything really large scale in contemporary society without have a legal team and a corporation." He's probably right, but for the sake of entrepreneurial journalism, we'd like to hope he's wrong. [From: New York Times: Media Decoder]





Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
HSBC Plans 14,000 More Job Cuts
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
Famous Roadside Attractions
Taylor Swift Q and A: What Does She Splurge on in Las Vegas?
Hands-on with the Samsung Galaxy S 4 running stock Android 4.2
Bill Gates regains title of world's richest person as Microsoft stock hits five-year high















Comments
2
Subscribe to commentsBrad HillMay 20th 2010 11:59AM
The CBS complaint is probably actionable. Shouldn't stop the 48HR magazine project though. I hope those guys simply rename and forge ahead.
elizabeth.madrigalMay 20th 2010 1:15PM
It makes me sad that a behemoth can throw its weight around secure in the knowledge that anyone without a trust fund would be hard pressed to fund the legal fees required to defend themselves. Legal intimidation is the standard bully posture because it works. Whether or not CBS has an actionable case or not, what a shame that they chose to press this issue. There is no way their trademark could be confused with this new 48 hr magazine. It is a fantastic and beautiful testament to the exciting and healing power of the arts, not a commercial TV show. Of course, as one of the journalists is my son, I do not claim to be subjective. However, I am sorry about the lack of a trust fund, , but I guess the 48 hr team is creative enough to come up with a new name.