Facebook to Simplify Privacy Options, Pats Itself on the Back
If your Web site's privacy policy is longer than the entire U.S. Constitution, it's probably a sign that you need to streamline things just a bit. Fortunately for Facebook users, Mark Zuckerberg seems to have finally gotten the hint. After facing a deluge of consumer complaints and confusion surrounding its newly convoluted approach to privacy, Facebook has apparently decided to unveil a set of still newer, "simplistic" privacy choices sometime over the next few weeks. In a recent radio interview, Facebook's head of public policy Tim Sparapani confirmed his company's decision to streamline its user options, confirming that the site is "going to be providing options for users who want simplistic bands of privacy that they can choose from." As Wired points out, it's still unclear what those options will look like, or the extent to which they'll be simplified. It appears, however, that the company has decided to back off from its policy of sharing user information by default, without allowing individuals to "opt-in" to the program.
Although Sparapani acknowledged the legitimacy of some consumer complaints, he also defended the network during his appearance on the Kojo Nnamdi public radio program, saying, "We have built a privacy setting for every new type of sharing [users] are allowed to have. What that means is that in fact we have come up with an extraordinary number of privacy settings." Sparapani went on to say that the site "should be compared to almost any other company out there where there are no privacy settings at all. So Facebook should be getting credit here for giving tools in the first place." He finished up by lauding his company's decision to plaster "Like" buttons across the Web, calling it "an extraordinary gift to the public."
We're relieved that Facebook has apparently decided to change its ways, but please, Tim Sparapani, spare us the "holier-than-thou" spiel. Facebook is not a typical corporation. When we walk into Whole Foods, we're there to buy overpriced arugula -- not to share personal information. We certainly would never thank our cashier for involuntarily sharing our purchases with third-party marketers, as you apparently expect us to do with Facebook. Most other companies are in the business of goods or services. Facebook manages personal information. There's a major difference between the two. [From: Wired]





Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Pete Cosey Dead: Chicago Guitar Great and Miles Davis Collaborator Dies at 68
A Journey To The Hottest Place On Earth: Dallol Ethiopia














Comments
1
Subscribe to commentsMichaelMay 19th 2010 2:09PM
I am so, so conflicted on this. Facebook is such a huge thing for my generation, and has been such a great way to connect with friends over the past few years. Things though have been getting scary recently, with people friending me that I'm afraid of (bad histories), weird emails from strangers being sent to me about my FB profile popping up during their google search for my apartment complex, and other creepy things. I think it's time to say goodbye to Facebook for me, there just has to be a line somewhere. I guess this it for me...http://thesmogger.com/2010/05/19/why-i-want-to-quit-facebook/