Massive Waterfall Proposed for Rio Olympics, But at What Cost?

The solar panel-embedded structure will primarily collect rays throughout the day and act as a power station for Rio, while the excess power will be used to run the massive pumps bringing the seawater to the top of the tower. The force of the water's fall will create additional hydroelectric power, as well. The designers are hoping to make the 2016 Olympics as energy-neutral as possible.
Questions loom, of course. Although Rio isn't known for bad weather, will an overcast spell send the Solar City Tower into paralysis? And with a structure this large, the spray of solvent seawater is sure to damage plants and buildings, just as Eliasson's did. How will RAFAA deal with the environmental impact of architecture that is supposed to conserve the planet, not kill it? And at what addition to the presumably monumental cost of construction? With the proposed inclusion of shops, an amphitheater, cafeteria and auditorium, the Solar City Tower is going to need quite a lot of electricity. Will the square footage of the exterior be broad enough to generate that kind of wattage? If there is anything we know about waterfalls, chasing them isn't always the best idea. [From: Treehugger]





Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Pete Cosey Dead: Chicago Guitar Great and Miles Davis Collaborator Dies at 68
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Michael Grant Dead: Crescent Shield Singer Dies Aged 39













