Is PowerPoint Oversimplifying Our Military Strategy?

The military has always relied on a hierarchical understanding of the world; rank, priority and power are the watchwords of this rigidly organized system in which one must know one's place to do anything at all. The bullet-point-prone software is perfect for establishing order out of chaos, which is why everyone from General Petraeus to President Obama gets a regular dose of PowerPoint to break down any given situation. But, in the same way that the H1N1-like spread of infographics across the Internet has triggered a backlash against visualized information, some high-ranking officials have had enough already with the slides.
Of course, memos and briefings existed well before the advent of PowerPoint, or even the personal computer. But the underlying issue is not necessarily the software itself, but the culture in which extraordinarily complex issues are condensed to key phrases and action items. PowerPoint is "dangerous because it can create the illusion of understanding and the illusion of control," General H.R. McMaster, who banned the software after his brigade took hold of the Iraqi city of Tal Afar in 2005, told the New York Times. "Some problems in the world are not bullet-izable." And McMaster is not alone in his sentiment.
Some junior officers may spend entire days putting together these presentations, but to what end? The Army, like any other large action-making body, needs clerical staff. But maybe some of that on-the-clock time could be better spent. As the jargon of corporate America seeps further into military culture, vague phrases like "conduct a key leader engagement" and "accelerate the introduction of new weapons" give the illusion of understanding the situation -- all while divorcing strategy further and further from reality. General Stanley A. McChrystal, the leader of American and NATO forces in Afghanistan, was shown this labyrinthine diagram in a PowerPoint presentation last summer, and subsequently quipped, "When we understand that slide, we'll have won the war." We're not laughing. [From: NYTimes]





Fast Food CEO Shuts Down Struggling Branch During 'Undercover Boss' Episode
Fla. School Bus Dispatcher Suspended With Pay After Allegedly Aiding Bank Robbery
This is why you need a dash cam on at all times [UPDATE]
The Hidden $1,000 Bonus Obama Put in Your Paycheck
House of the Day: David Hyde Pierce's Spanish Palace
Money and Power: The Richest and Poorest U.S. Presidents
Women Guitarist Dead: Christopher Reimer, 26, Dies in His Sleep
Art and Superheroines: When Over-Sexualization Kills the Story [Sex]
The Tax Break That Millions Miss Out On
Replacements' Slim Dunlap Hospitalized After Stroke
















Comments
6
Subscribe to commentsMaking11sApr 27th 2010 3:18PM
PowerPoint is a cancer.
If done correctly, the room is bored by the third slide. If done incorrectly, the person giving the presentation puts everything they are going to say on the slides then read it aloud, leading viewers to stop taking that person seriously forever.
It's also the number #1 cause of me dropping classes when I was in school. I can't tell you how many times I walked in to a room with a fat, bespectacled moron reading paragraphs upon paragraphs directly from the PowerPoint presentation we were told to read the night before.
jbennettApr 28th 2010 1:39PM
I once briefed the Joint Chiefs of Staff before the days of PowerPoint. We had to reduce our presentation of real slides for use on an opaque projector. The Chiefs also got copies of the slides and the script of the presentation ahead of time. Except in my case, where I was told hours before the briefing that the Chief of Naval Operations thought that my 17 slides were too many and would confuse or lose his counterparts regarding this vital Navy-oriented program. This threw the system into turmoil and I ultimately told all the people between me (a lowly O-5) and the Chiefs that I would take four or five slides from the 17 and talk to them. I was still handwriting my new script when they called me in for the briefing. Of course after the briefing is done, they kick the subject matter expert out and come to a decision on what to do.
CSeekellApr 30th 2010 4:42PM
I suggest people read the work of Edward Tufte on powerpoint. He made these same points years ago concerning NASA and the space shuttle accident.
mcchrystalApr 28th 2010 4:41PM
but don't you think the problem might not be the technology -- like, let's not blame powerpoint -- but the actual STRATEGY the powerpoint is trying to help them understand?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/meghan-ohara/diagram-of-a-war-strategy_b_555389.html
Matthew ZurasApr 28th 2010 4:42PM
That's exactly what I wrote. Third paragraph. Thanks for reading.
AmongusApr 30th 2010 11:05PM
what's that saying? - a poor workman blames his tools...