As
pacemakers become increasingly connected via the Web, doctors and patients must figure out how to protect these devices from security breaches. Some attempts include
using ultrasound waves and
developing 'cloaking' devices, among other techniques. But, according to Popular Science,
Microsoft Research (.PDF) believes that
tattooing the device's password onto the patient's skin in ultraviolet (UV) ink is the best way to protect against hacks. Rather than printing the password on a bracelet or a radio frequency identification tag (RFID), which could be lost or hacked respectively, the ink would be permanent and could only be viewed with a UV light upon the patient's consent. This method wouldn't cost hospitals much, either, since all they'd really need is a UV light.
Still, we wonder how many folks would be okay with a tattoo -- even if it was only visible under a UV light. Despite the wealth of people with tattoos these days, it's still a little taboo for some -- particularly the elderly, who would be the most likely recipients. But if researchers can overcome this potential stigma, it could be the safest and most efficient way to protect medical devices from hacks. You know some part of your grandpa regrets not having gotten a tattoo back when he was stationed in the Philippines, anyway. [From:
Popular Science and
Microsoft Research]
Tags: hack, health, medical, pacemaker, rfid, security, tattoo, top, Ultraviolet, uv, wireless
Comments
1
Subscribe to commentsMikeApr 17th 2010 7:14PM
I'm a Tattooer in Phoenix Arizona. Im down to help out. Sounds like a good idea.