Symantec, maker of the
Norton line of
security products, conducted a
study in which it analyzed the number of cyber-attacks, malware infections, Wi-Fi hotspots, and other factors in order to determine the 50 riskiest online cities. Not surprisingly, Forbes magazine's 2009
most wired city is Symantec's 2010 riskiest city. Seattle, Washington was the most vulnerable city by a large margin, thanks to its ranking in the top ten for every individual metric. It ranked second for both risky behavior and Wi-Fi hotspots, and sixth for number of cyber-attacks per capita.
The overall number two spot was occupied by Boston, with Washington, D.C. landing in third place. Surprisingly, the States' most populous city, New York, came in at 24th place, meaning we must be doing
something right here in the Big Apple. Hit the source link to check out the rest of the list, and to see how well (or poorly) your own hometown fares against the competition. [From:
Symantec, Via:
Fox News]
Tags: cities, cybercrime, seattle, security, survey, symantec, top, wi-fi
Comments
5
Subscribe to commentsBob DobbsMar 22nd 2010 7:21PM
Fox "News" is your source? REALLY?
Raffi12Mar 23rd 2010 2:13PM
The source is Symantac.
Leader DesslokMar 23rd 2010 12:56AM
[From: Symantec, Via: Fox News] That means that Fox reported this, and THEIR source was Symantec. So, in actuality Switched's source was Fox.
Shawn AmesMar 23rd 2010 10:22AM
TTTT, the reason that NYC came in so low on the list and thus 'safe' is probably because of the lower trust factor in New York, which is good because people tend to protect their Wi-Fi signals.
RiojoanzMar 24th 2010 9:47PM
NYC is ranked 24th because the stingy city does not have many hotspots beyond the tourist areas, Starbucks and public libraries. A city this size should have free wi-fi throughout.