FCC Considering Free Wireless Broadband as Part of National Plan

It's important to keep in mind that these are only recommendations. The FCC will surely beef up the argument for providing free Internet, and will hopefully offer some sort of outline about how to go about implementing it. Ultimately, though, it'll be up to members of Congress to pick and choose what parts of the FCC's proposal it wants to put into action. Given the political gridlock that's recently taken hold of Capitol Hill (and the sadly realistic possibility that "socialist Wi-Fi" could ignite another powder keg of Tea Party hysteria), we wouldn't get our hopes up, even in a country where one-third of the population doesn't have high-speed access. Providing free or subsidized broadband makes absolutely perfect sense -- which is exactly why we're not optimistic about seeing it come to fruition.
(Ed. note: The story's title should have read "FCC Considering Free Wireless Broadband," not "Free Wi-Fi.") [From: Reuters, via: LifeHacker]





St. Louis Sports Bar Gives Man Receipt Criticizing His Child
'Undercover Boss': Top 4 Moments From Season 4 [VIDEO]
Las Vegas Court Officials Accused Of Covering Up Sex Assault [VIDEO]
Groomers Lose Dog, Claim Not Responsible
Walmart vs. Costco: How Do They Really Compare?
'Lone Ranger' Star Johnny Depp Opens Up About Split From Vanessa Paradis
The Story Behind Shapewear: From Girdles to Spanx
Male Judge Sets Dress Code For Female Lawyers And Sparks Uproar
'Grease' Cast: Where Are They Now?
Careless Chinese Baggage Handler Really Throws Himself Into His Work












Comments
6
Subscribe to commentsjoshMar 10th 2010 4:44PM
Where's the scientific evidence that this proposal is safe? I am not aware of any public studies attempting to answer the question of whether or not the frequencies used by wi-max can induce biological changes in humans and other living things. Based on currently available data on other, lower-frequency microwave exposures (i.e. cell phones), we have sound reason for concern. Until such safety studies are carried out, this proposal should be off the table.
flapsMar 10th 2010 5:23PM
I agree that there is a serious health concern about wireless, but it's not clear to me whether a proposal like this would increase or decrease the amount of radio energy being poured into the air. I live in a small town and my laptop shows eight wireless networks available in my house. In a large city or apartment building I imagine one finds dozens. If there were some sort of government-run wireless access, perhaps there would be only one or two.
Tom PoeMar 11th 2010 10:34AM
What are you talking about? What frequencies are you referring to? The television white space frequencies we have been using for decades? Radio frequencies we have been using for decades? Why now? Why not shut down tv and radio (frequencies used by broadband/wireless/wimax)? Or, is that your proposal?
ZLiberatorMar 11th 2010 7:46PM
That is exactly why America will fall to 2nd place "Ignorance!" the first two posters are the symbol and the root cause of our destruction. Glenn Beck said so therefore it must be true.
MOBMar 11th 2010 7:48PM
@josh & @Flaps morons, ignorant fools your thinking is what will push America to 2nd place!
hoosierMar 16th 2010 4:11AM
Our representatives wouldn't dare offer something like this to their constituents, as it would be something they could actually use and benefit from.