<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for What's the Best Point-and-Shoot Camera Under $150?</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for What's the Best Point-and-Shoot Camera Under $150?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on What's the Best Point-and-Shoot Camera Under $150?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</guid><description><![CDATA[Question--the statement that, "Panasonic's DCM-F3 is due out soon, packs a couple more megapixels, and addresses all of the aforementioned issues (minus the zoom),"  would indicate that the soon to come camera might have an improvement including a WIDE ANGLE LENS.  Is that true?  Do ANY digital cameras under $200 include a WIDE ANGLE LENS?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Murphy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2010 2:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on What's the Best Point-and-Shoot Camera Under $150?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</guid><description><![CDATA[The big problem with this review and many others is that they fail to say whether the cameras support RAW images as well as JPGs. The reader wants a camera that takes great pictures. Well, for many of us, if you can't capture it in RAW, it won't be a great picture. While many point-and-shoot users don't care about RAW mode, many of us do! I have a DSLR that supports RAW and having gotten used to it, I also want a good point-and-shoot that supports it.<br><br>No review is complete without mentioning image formats supported.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2010 8:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on What's the Best Point-and-Shoot Camera Under $150?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</guid><description><![CDATA[Expecting RAW capabilities in a $120 camera is entirely unrealistic. It's a point and shoot, and a cheap one at that, not a pro rig. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2010 7:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on What's the Best Point-and-Shoot Camera Under $150?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</guid><description><![CDATA[The are a few with a wide-angle lens priced at $150:<br>Nikon Coolpix S3000 (27-108 mm equiv.)<br>Olympus FE-4020 (26-105 mm equiv.)<br>Kodak EasyShare M550 (28-140mm equiv.)<br><br>Suzanne Kantra, Editor, <a href="http://www.techlicious.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.techlicious.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Kantra]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 8th 2010 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on What's the Best Point-and-Shoot Camera Under $150?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</guid><description><![CDATA[RAW costs nothing to ad, it is just programing in the camera.  And RAW is not just for the pro, it will be helpful to anyone who cares to take a good picture.  After all, any digital picture begins with a RAW image, then the camera's programing converts it to a jpg.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John McPherson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2010 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on What's the Best Point-and-Shoot Camera Under $150?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2010/02/26/whats-the-best-point-and-shoot-camera-under-150/</guid><description><![CDATA[Have to agree with the other poster...anyone looking for a decent $100 camera could care less about RAW images and is not looking to do any post production.  They are THRILLED to have jpegs that they can see and sort on their computer.  You are completely out of touch with the concept "ease of use."  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mongoose65]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2010 11:05AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
