What's the Best Point-and-Shoot Camera Under $150?

Dear Reader: While our first instinct is to dispatch Switched's 'Minority Report'-style Precrimes Division in order to prevent any more techie tragedies at the hands of your wife, you asked for an answer and not an intervention, so we'll keep them at bay. For now.
We have to confess that we initially scoffed at the idea of a quality digital camera for under $150. After digging deeper, though, we realized that prices really have dropped precipitously in recent years. Certainly, we still believe you almost always get what you pay for, especially with cameras, but, as it turns out, standards have risen so much that even many sub-$200 cameras provide bang for your buck. We tip our hats to the engineers and laws of microeconomics for this minor miracle.
That said, there's still a lot of garbage on the shelves masquerading as bargains, so we'd never recommend buying solely on price. Brittle plastic housings, drinking-glass quality optics, substandard image processing, and awful build quality all still abound. One sub-$150 point-and-shoot we particularly like, however, is Panasonic's Lumix DMC-FS7, which we find for $120 or so online. Yes, it's about a year old, but its specs still stand up well, and -- minus a few shortcomings -- it's a bona fide bargain.
The FS7's upsides include: fantastic 10.1 megapixel stills; optical image stabilization; a bright 2.7-inch LCD viewer; F2.8 Leica DC Vario-Elmarit lenses; and the ability to fit neatly in a shirt pocket or purse. It captures exceptionally crisp, bright images in daylight, and -- though things are less impressive in low-light with high ISO settings -- flash photos go from pretty good to great. It's simple to operate too, free of the baffling menu options and preponderant buttons that many competing models employ. In fact, if you set it to IA (intelligent auto) mode, it's practically idiot-proof.
The FS7's only real downsides are those common to cameras of its class: a mere 4x optical zoom; a non-wide angle lens; and an inability to shoot HD video. Although HD video is becoming increasingly standard on point-and-shoots, the FS7's video tops out at 30fps of standard definition video (640x480 at 4:3, or 848x480 at 16:9). If you have time to wait before your wife's next rampage, Panasonic's DCM-F3 is due out soon, packs a couple more megapixels, and addresses all of the aforementioned issues (minus the zoom) -- all for just a couple bucks more. Happy shooting, and condolences in advance for your imminent loss.





Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Justin Bieber Booed, Gets Standing Ovation at Billboard Music Awards
2013 Billboard Music Awards Best and Worst Dressed
Watch: Kansas Meteorologist Seeks Shelter From Tornado
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
Two Pilots Fired After Brazilian Pop Star Takes Captain's Seat Mid-Flight
Selena Gomez Leaving Justin Bieber's House: Booty Call Rumors Swirl















Comments
6
Subscribe to commentsMurphyMar 3rd 2010 2:15PM
Question--the statement that, "Panasonic's DCM-F3 is due out soon, packs a couple more megapixels, and addresses all of the aforementioned issues (minus the zoom)," would indicate that the soon to come camera might have an improvement including a WIDE ANGLE LENS. Is that true? Do ANY digital cameras under $200 include a WIDE ANGLE LENS?
MikeMar 4th 2010 8:44PM
The big problem with this review and many others is that they fail to say whether the cameras support RAW images as well as JPGs. The reader wants a camera that takes great pictures. Well, for many of us, if you can't capture it in RAW, it won't be a great picture. While many point-and-shoot users don't care about RAW mode, many of us do! I have a DSLR that supports RAW and having gotten used to it, I also want a good point-and-shoot that supports it.
No review is complete without mentioning image formats supported.
AndreasMar 5th 2010 7:19AM
Expecting RAW capabilities in a $120 camera is entirely unrealistic. It's a point and shoot, and a cheap one at that, not a pro rig.
Suzanne KantraMar 8th 2010 10:19AM
The are a few with a wide-angle lens priced at $150:
Nikon Coolpix S3000 (27-108 mm equiv.)
Olympus FE-4020 (26-105 mm equiv.)
Kodak EasyShare M550 (28-140mm equiv.)
Suzanne Kantra, Editor, http://www.techlicious.com
John McPhersonMar 9th 2010 5:48PM
RAW costs nothing to ad, it is just programing in the camera. And RAW is not just for the pro, it will be helpful to anyone who cares to take a good picture. After all, any digital picture begins with a RAW image, then the camera's programing converts it to a jpg.
mongoose65May 7th 2010 11:05AM
Have to agree with the other poster...anyone looking for a decent $100 camera could care less about RAW images and is not looking to do any post production. They are THRILLED to have jpegs that they can see and sort on their computer. You are completely out of touch with the concept "ease of use."