Facebook has become an indispensable part of daily life for many people. They use it to keep in touch with friends and family, to play games, and to track down old flames. So, it's only natural that folks would panic at the thought of having to pay for what has been a free service. And, of course, there are plenty of e-con men willing to exploit that fear for profit.
The 'We Will Not Pay for Facebook' Scam
Back in December, a group protesting
Facebook and the company's rumored plans to charge users $4.99 a month, amassed well over 100,000 members. Of course, it was a
giant scam; Facebook had no such agenda, and the group merely served to distribute links to a site that loaded up visiting PCs with malware. Two months later, the scam is back, this time claiming that Facebook plans to charge $3.99. And it's been even
more successful.
The three groups perpetrating the hoax have collected roughly 340,000 gullible Facebook users, and the number is still climbing.
A Facebook
spokesperson denied even the possibility of such plans to the Telegraph, saying, "We have no plans to charge users for Facebook's basic services. Facebook is a free service..." That's a pretty clear statement, so why does this rumor seem so reluctant to die?
Gold Memberships?

There are other scams that play on, and add to, the confusion. The age-old "
gold membership" scam has made its way to Facebook. These "upgrade" groups and pages prey on the unfounded fear of subscription fees, urging users: "GET YOUR UPGRADE WHILE THEIR [sic] FREE!!" The promised free upgrade to the (nonexistent) Facebook Gold account leads you on a wild goose chase in which you spread the scam by inviting your friends, fill out a pointless survey, and ultimately hand over your cell phone number and sign up for a bogus service. The service, of course, does absolutely nothing, and charges your cell phone bill several dollars every month.
Staying Power
First, these are relatively well-constructed scams with believable rationales behind their claims of forthcoming fees. The groups' creators (or creator) claim that Facebook, hemorrhaging cash, is on the verge of being bought out by a nameless corporate entity. The groups even provide links to fake articles about the impending subscription fee. The Gold Membership trick only enhances the believability of the rumors. Users who may have been initially skeptical of the claims that Facebook planned to charge may suddenly become believers at the sight of a Facebook Gold Account logo.
Additionally, Facebook is not doing much to put their members' minds at ease. Not content with Facebook being a social network funded primarily through advertising, founder
Mark Zuckerberg has pushed for the site's evolution into a development platform and marketplace. The latest fuel on the fire is Facebook's
partnership with PayPal. The deal could allow users and companies to pay for ads, add credits for in-app purchases, and to buy games -- all using PayPal, and all directly through Facebook.
Facebook has also done very little to squash the false rumors; the groups seem to survive without much threat of deletion. The company's denial of the rumors is also vague enough (only stating that "Facebook's basic services" will always be free) to keep the truly paranoid person's mind churning.
None of that changes the fact that these groups are obvious scams. They're loaded with shady links and spam messages, and the administrators of
all three groups use the same Cat Eye Promotions logo as their profile images.
How to Avoid the Scams

Just be smart.
The gold membership pages are the most obvious. The groups urge you to upgrade "WHILE
THEIR FREE." And, as if such flagrant misuse of the English language didn't set off enough alarms, you'll notice that the "comments" on these pages are just static images tied to malicious links.
In the end, the real reason people fall for the ruse is a willingness to believe anything they read, mixed with a palpable financial paranoia. This isn't unique to
social networking and malware distributors, though. Less than admirable agenda-ists have been using similar tricks since the dawn of the nation.
http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,entry&id=786664&pid=786663&uts=1266932049
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/cs_feed_v1_6/csfeedwrapper.swf
Facebook's Most Annoying Things
Getty Images
Most Annoying Things About Facebook
Sure, Facebook can be a lot of fun. It's a great way to reconnect with lost friends and to keep up with people on the fringes of your social circle. And as far as workday distractions go, there's nothing better.
It's hardly a perfect service, though. Minor aggravations add up fast and can drive you nuts. We've combed through the annoyances to find the ten annoyances that bug people the most.
Most Annoying Things About Facebook
Problem: Constant interface changes
Why it's annoying: Granted, innovation is necessary to avoid becoming stale, but sometimes you're better off leaving well enough alone. Facebook has radically overhauled its front page so many times that it's hard to keep count. Just as the anger dies down over one design, the site changes things again -- and confusion sets in. What's the difference between "News feed" and "Live feed"? And why can't Facebook remember which I prefer?
Possible solution: Sadly, there's not much you can do about this -- except wait for the next face-lift.
Most Annoying Things About Facebook
Problem: Inappropriate automated friend suggestions
Why it's annoying: Friend suggestions can be handy, but when Facebook tries to push an ex-girlfriend or boyfriend on you, it's kind of awkward. Similarly, if you've had a major falling-out with someone who has mutual friends, you're bound to see their face pop up in the 'suggestion' field at some point. It makes a clean break that much harder to get.
Possible solution: The little "x" to the right will make the suggestion go away forever. To prevent further frustration, you might want to also click "see all" and weed out any other offending names.
Most Annoying Things About Facebook
Problem: Never-ending game invitations
Why it's annoying: 'Farmville' and 'Mafia Wars' might be fun, but if you don't want to play them, the constant invites are infuriating. Many Facebook games are like Ponzi schemes; the way to succeed is to get more people playing. And once you've managed to filter out one game, another pops up.
Possible solution: It's not too hard to hide the requests and invitations for these games. Just click "Block this application" when you get the first invite. Then, hover over the updates that are clogging your news feed, and click "Hide" when the word appears.
Most Annoying Things About Facebook
Problem: Political fights
Why it's annoying: Between cable news and talk radio, it's hard enough to hide the squabbling between the left and the right. So when political debates fire up on Facebook, it's particularly annoying. All you want to do is see friends' pictures and learn what they're up to -- not eavesdrop on a debate over healthcare reform.
Possible solution: If you've got a friend who picks such fights in their status updates, you might be best off hiding them. You can still check in on them whenever you'd like, but you won't have opinions shoved down your throat.
Most Annoying Things About Facebook
Problem: Imported updates from Twitter
Why it's annoying: Tweets have their own language and shorthand, and if you're not familiar with the 140-character-or-less updates, it might look like someone had a hand spasm while typing. Facebook and Twitter are two entirely different services -- and forcing the two together feels like a poorly arranged marriage.
Possible solution: Once again, you're kind of stuck. Your best bet is to either embrace the language of the tweet -- or learn to selectively ignore posts.
Most Annoying Things About Facebook
Problem: No 'Dislike' button
Why it's annoying: A friend proudly mentions in a status update that she got a promotion. That's an easy thing to like. But what about when they announce they've been laid off? In its relentless drive to be cheery, Facebook hasn't given us the choice to quickly commiserate or disagree with someone.
Possible solution: There's an active lobbying effort to get Facebook to add a 'Dislike' button, with over 553,000 people members of a group specifically asking for one. Hopefully, the powers that be will listen to the protests.
Most Annoying Things About Facebook
Problem: People who 'friend' you too fast
Why it's annoying: Sometimes it's a person you've gone out with one time. Sometimes it's a coworker you only speak with occasionally. But odds are you've been 'friended' by someone you'd rather not have on your list. Technically, ignoring the request is an option, but that can create some real world tensions.
Possible solution: Your privacy settings can make this problem an easy one to conquer. You can block specific people from seeing status updates, photos and more by choosing 'custom' and black-listing them. Then, hide their updates from your news feed.
Most Annoying Things About Facebook
Problem: Stealth tagging
Why it's annoying: We all have horrifying childhood pictures or shots we wouldn't want to share with the world. Invariably, though, friends will post them as a joke of sorts and tag you. All of a sudden, that prom picture of you with acne, coke-bottle glasses, and a really bad perm is out there for everyone to see.
Possible solution: You can untag yourself, which prevents others from putting your name to the picture -- but in some cases, that's closing the barn door after the horse has run away.
Most Annoying Things About Facebook
Problem: Obvious celebrity marketing ploys
Why it's annoying: Celebrities love Facebook -- or so it would seem. But all too often, it's someone writing on their behalf (and often poorly). That doesn't stop avid fans from falling over themselves to 'like' every comment and chime in as part of the 'amen' chorus.
Possible solution: Unless you're sure it's actually the celebrity doing the updates, you'd often do better to just avoid the pages. After all, is it really that critical that you declare yourself as a fan?
Most Annoying Things About Facebook

Tags: facebook, features, hoax, malware, scam, security, social networking, SocialNetworking, top, we will not pay to use facebook, web, WeWillNotPayToUseFacebook
Comments
66
Subscribe to commentsallen hockadayFeb 23rd 2010 7:24AM
I wish they would quit screwing with facebook and the games are starting to suck also and take forever to play. I have quit several because of it. The enjoyment is getting less and less each month just to be part of it. I don't post myself enough to keep others informed of everything. I just don't need the glory of that for myself. And my true firends know what I'm up to anyway.
bobalanross51Feb 23rd 2010 11:13AM
I don't even use Facebook except to get messages from my church. It was beginning to take over my life. All the invites from this person and that organization and all the passing around of IQ tests, hugs, etc..
They should rename is as Lamebook
Alivia PowellFeb 23rd 2010 1:51PM
well that is new to me but I would like to state that i received an e-mail that stated that my password ahd to be changed. and when i was just being curious to see my computer found a virus in the message. just thought that people should know be for they open an email like that. from facebook
kevinkersonNov 11th 2010 4:40PM
Yes i use facebook and i think that you have to pay...
Cash for Gold Scam
sageFeb 23rd 2010 7:49AM
i would not pay for any social network including PUSBOOK
razziFeb 23rd 2010 7:51AM
AND WHY do I need Facebook to keep in touch with whomever? I have my e-mails and phone to do that with. An e-mail works just fine for me and I do hear back, so what's the point of Facebook anyway?? Oh I know, it's so you can keep in touch with friends, WHAT!? Oh and play the games, I forgot that. How would you feel visiting someone and you leave the room for a minute, come back, there gone and you find them in their computer room playing a game on Facebook. Then don't get off of it because of it? How rude is that! They spend there whole day doing this your told. Good Lord, now we are addicted to a game on Facebook! Come on people-----get a life!
Alivia PowellFeb 23rd 2010 2:07PM
Everything I have read on here is griping about the way people use sites. It sounds to me like it is the person. Its not like the site is forceing them to play. they choose to start the game and choose to keep going back. ne good bussiness would be stupid not to have a number of different things to OFFER to their users. it just erks me when people are graping about a site when it is not the sites fault. its the users who have nothing better to do. look at this site people have nothing better to do than come to this site blogging and graping. it pretty much the same concept. just different site different day.
nothing personal to ne one just blogging bout the complexity of thing said, or not said.
lisaFeb 23rd 2010 2:11PM
I think that you just had a bad experience with a rude person who did not get it that when you have a real live person visiting that trumps all computer, phone, games, etc.
Facebook is good for what it is but will not take the place of real human contact.
blue497497Oct 27th 2010 6:17PM
cash for gold scam
sandd2001Feb 23rd 2010 8:36AM
If FB knows its a scam don't they have th right to block/shut down any ill advised user accounts including pages associated with it? DO IT ZUCKERBERG, you can monitor the spam a little better than that!
chesFeb 23rd 2010 8:48AM
Shouldn't there be a [sic] after "their" in "GET YOUR UPGRADE WHILE THEIR FREE!!" within the context of the article?
Matthew ZurasFeb 23rd 2010 10:14AM
@ches:
Thanks, we added a [sic] after the first "their." Although, we did originally underline "their" in the second mention -- we're writers, after all, and that did not escape us.
cathyhriFeb 23rd 2010 9:12AM
Who proofreads these stories? On the Gold Membership story, it's they're not their. How can these stories be taken seriously if the writers can't even spell correctly?
MaggieFeb 23rd 2010 10:53AM
That is the point> The group itself used the wrong form, not this article. It states that the use of the wrong form should be a red flag that the group is a scam.
loriFeb 23rd 2010 9:15AM
The story's bottom line, to me, is that Facebook is somewhat vague about denying the claims. FB has been, in fact, very sneaky about extending its reach beyond a social network site. The most recent is that now you have to provide your e-mail to various apps. There's a reason for that -- advertisers want to get to you personally and directly rather than flash ads on your computer screen. So I'd not be surprised at all to see FB at some time in the future start charging for certain features and services. The alliance with Paypal would certainly be the foundation for such a fee.
Anyway, joining a protest FB page isn't going to sway the website one way or another. In fact, the more people who join and protest, the more traffic the site sees. So it's counter productive. If FB starts charging for services, I'll just stop using it.
lsgilbert89Feb 23rd 2010 2:16PM
Easy enough to get past the e-mail thing. I just give them my spam-filter e-mail account. ^_~ That way, they can keep sending their e-mails into a black hole I'll never see.
lifeisgood_5Mar 1st 2010 3:53PM
Those apps are 3rd party applications. Facebook merely creates a platform for those applications to run on and anyone with coding experience can write an app. Blame the app creators (Farmville is created by Zynga http://www.zynga.com/ ) on requiring your email address. As for advertising on Facebook - those are targeted based on what basic information you put on your info page. Remove most of the info and the ads will become more generic.
troisilkFeb 23rd 2010 9:22AM
They should start a fee for Facebook, so that young teens and children wouldn't have access to a networking source that could be potentially dangerous to someone of that age........
Please, charge as much as you'd like. Although I do believe it's the parents responsibilty to monitor their childrens activity, just like our parents tried to monitor our phone usage (back in the day of land lines) we always found a way to get the call through. The difference is, we were only talking with one person, not the entire network.........never mind being able to post pictures, personal info or even worse sexting. Someone out there needs to be able to monitor and police these sites. Until then, put a charge on it............
bobalanross51Feb 23rd 2010 11:20AM
Too many children have their parents' credit card info including the security code on the back. Once that information is there the cardholder will have a hell of a time contesting it. I don't think children should have cell phones, credit card info, etc.. It is just another way of letting children raise themselves so the parents don't have to pay any attention to what they brought into the world. Facebook can be a great babysitter. Yeah right!!!
PatsySFeb 25th 2010 10:03AM
Charging for membership will NOT stop children from joining the site. Many children have plenty of money to spend on games & recreation. Age limits haven't worked, why would charging membership fees?