Five Things to Consider When Buying a Computer
OS

Windows 7
Windows is the dominant player in the computer world, and with good reason. It has the largest catalog of available apps (including plenty of great free options), is compatible with more hardware than are its competitors, and, like it or not, is the OS of choice for most businesses. While OS X and Linux are catching up in terms of available software and hardware compatibility, they still can't quite match Microsoft's product, especially when it comes to games.
On the downside, Windows is the most vulnerable OS when it comes to viruses and other malware (although that is largely due to its popularity). With its largest competitor, Apple, claiming a mere five-percent of the market, Windows makes the most attractive target for scammers and hackers.
If you opt for a Windows PC, make sure you get a 64-bit version of Windows 7. The Home Premium version will suffice for most users, but geeks and professionals who might need some of the advanced networking features and XP emulation will want Professional.
OS X
Macs are known for their ease of use and sleek design. They've long been the standard choice for creative types and excel at such applications as audio and video editors. Thanks in large part to Apple's popularity with hip, tech-savvy types, more companies have been making sure their software and hardware are compatible with the platform. If you absolutely must have a Mac, but still need to run Windows software, there are options like Boot Camp and Parallels, but they require that you purchase a copy of Windows and have at least some computational acumen.
Thanks in part to its relatively small market share, OS X users are not frequently targeted by cyber-criminals, and the OS, thanks to its Unix underpinnings, is more secure than Windows. With its robust set of included apps, such as iTunes, iMovie, and iPhoto, OS X is an excellent choice for the user who wants to put minimal effort into their computing experience.
Linux
Linux has grown by leaps and bounds over the last five years. Most hardware on the market is compatible with this open-source operating system, and it has become infinitely more user friendly than its "geeks only" reputation would have you believe. While there are plenty of great free apps for Linux, you won't have access to many modern 3-D games or to Microsoft's Office suite. Many Windows apps will run with the help of an emulator called Wine, but it's far from a perfect solution.
Linux shines, though, if you're a heavy user of Web apps, like Google Docs. Its lightweight nature makes it perfect for netbooks, and it's even less susceptible to hacking and malware than OS X. That said, despite having an extremely active and helpful user community, Linux is often more difficult to troubleshoot than either OSX or Windows.





'Undercover Boss': Top 4 Moments From Season 4 [VIDEO]
St. Louis Sports Bar Gives Man Receipt Criticizing His Child
Las Vegas Court Officials Accused Of Covering Up Sex Assault [VIDEO]
Groomers Lose Dog, Claim Not Responsible
Walmart vs. Costco: How Do They Really Compare?
The Story Behind Shapewear: From Girdles to Spanx
'Lone Ranger' Star Johnny Depp Opens Up About Split From Vanessa Paradis
'Grease' Cast: Where Are They Now?
Male Judge Sets Dress Code For Female Lawyers And Sparks Uproar
Careless Chinese Baggage Handler Really Throws Himself Into His Work












Comments
9
Subscribe to commentsRocklandGeekFeb 17th 2010 10:31AM
O'Brien strikes out. The VERY FIRST thing you need to know when buying a computer is NOT the operating system, but what you will use it for. If you don't know what you will use it for, the operating system is geekspeak. Start with your use, then go to the software that does the job, and finally get to the operating system.
SanskritFeb 17th 2010 2:13PM
Okay, why is it you list the downsides of Windows systems but not that of Apple or Linux ones? Every system has its ups and downs and to list the faults of one without mentioning the others (and yes, Virginia, MacOS and Linux do have faults) shows a bias.
wulffbaneFeb 17th 2010 3:45PM
O'Brien is quoted as saying
"While there are plenty of great free apps for Linux, you won't have access to many modern 3-D games or to Microsoft's Office suite."
HELLO!!! What about the open source product OpenOffice3.x? It's so similar to MS Office that it's not funny.
Linux has so much free software to download that it defies description comparable to some of the titles you have to pay for.
terrenceFeb 17th 2010 11:33PM
@Wulffbane
If you continued reading the article you'll notice I make mention of Open Office and other free apps available for Linux. However it doesn't change the fact that the industry standard -- Microsoft Office -- does not run natively on Linux. OOo lacks many of the advanced features packed in Excel, doesn't offer a competitor to Viso, Project, or OneNote, and Evolution (while technically not part of OOo) is not a viable replacement for Outlook.
Your right to say that OOo is similar to MS Office... as long as you're talking about Office XP.
wulffbaneFeb 18th 2010 5:02PM
Terr...
I did read the entire article, and noticed the blurb about Open Office on the very last page. I use both OpenOffice and Office2003(only because I have licences through my past employer).
About 5 mins of research revealed that one has to shell out between $399.95 just to get Outlook in Office Standard addition and a whopping $679.95 to get both Outlook AND One Note together. You'll be spending at least $499.95 to have MS Access and MS Publisher included.
Also, Visio does NOT come with MSOffice!! ,(ADD an additional $559)
and neither does MSProject!! (Add an additional $599.95->$999.95).
FOR all the features you mentioned, the "average home user" would be spending upwards of $1600!!! (They could buy another 2-3 PC's for that!).
**OpenOffice has had 100,000,000 downloads in just ONE year. Thats correct: One Hundred Million. I think that speaks for itself.
*** OpenOffice comes with both an FREE Access clone and a FREE Publisher clone and a program that is on par with OneNote as a FREE Linux download...
*** You can install OpenOffice on as many computers as you like, no license restrictions, and most importantly it will run on a Windows platform, and save documents in MSOffice 2007 formats! (unless Windows7 has purposefully made it "incompatible").
Perhaps you should have swapped that line about getting Open Office for free with the one about not getting M$Office(for $1600). Your Linux paragraph makes one think that they are "missing out" on something by not having M$Office rather than the free OpenOffice...
I doubt the majority of people reading this article are going to be interested in "advanced features" of Excel,Visio,Project etc.
As far as "industry standard" goes , for now....., Ms Office is... however, things can change and I think MS feels the pressure of open source software coming down on them (they lost 10-14% in sales on MS Office in 2009), and they are fighting a trend that is unlikely to cease progressing.
OpenSource may very well be the next "industry standard" in the years to come.
(Hmmmm... would I rather pay for an expensive Mercedes-Benz or get a free Honda??)
Based on your target audience, I believe you'd get more takers on the free Honda.
As a small business owner, FREE is my favorite 4-letter word.
W.B.
Matthew BarichFeb 19th 2010 1:19AM
In this article, it says to always get a 64-bit version of Windows.
Bad idea. There are many disadvantages of the 64-bit versions of Windows. First of all, they REQUIRE 64-bit drivers -- which means that NO hardware will work with them unless it has 64-bit drivers.
Also, although the 64-bit versions of Windows have backward compatibility with 32-bit applications, they have NO backward compatibility with 16-bit applications.
There is NO advantage to having a 64-bit version of Windows unless your computer has MORE than 4 GB of RAM.
RJGnycFeb 19th 2010 1:44PM
1. Linux? You're joking, of course. Not everything works under Linux, and even when it does there are frequently problems installing the software. Apple is great for media manipulation and is currently safer from hackers, but the "user experience" of its interface is no longer a significant enough differentiator to recommend it. (They're always prettier, however, even when turned off.) 32-bit is still fine, and more programs & hardware work with it than 64-bit.
2. Dual Core 2 versus Core i7 - can anyone tell the difference in performance? I bet they can tell the difference in price.
3. Software: This is just wrong information. Example: Office Small Business is the same if you buy with a PC or as an upgrade to an existing Office installation. So IF you own Office already, the upgrade plus shipping plus time to install the software is the SAME as having Dell or HP or Sony etc. install it. If you do NOT already own an upgradeable copy of Office then you will pay much MORE buying retail. Regarding alternatives: Open Office kinda works, but has no Visio equivalent (increasingly in demand, as Project used to be before people started bailing on it). Google Docs is still a geek's pipe dream. If you need to guarantee compatibility, it's Corel or Microsoft.
4. Hardware: If you want more than 320GB on the drive, you will pay a premium. Many vendors don't offer 8GB RAM with some chipsets. If you add touch capability to to the 5102, you will pay for it. These price options are all nontrivial.
COBRYMar 2nd 2010 1:52AM
do not buy hp they are junk
ineltalimitadaMar 2nd 2010 5:27PM
Why you don't said that if I use Windows home in my office is against the Law.
Microsoft can put me on Jail.
For Work, you must by a professional window.