Homophobic Tweet Lands Vodafone Rep on 'Indefinite' Suspension
There's biting the hand that feeds you, and then there's severing the hand that feeds you. The line separating the two, as one Vodafone employee recently proved, is pretty clearly defined. On Friday afternoon, Vodafone's nearly 9,000 Twitter followers were left scratching their heads after reading a tweet on the company's page that read: "VodafoneUK is fed up of dirty homo's and is going after beaver." The tweet, as The Guardian reports, was apparently the work of a bored (and bigoted) customer service rep based in Stoke, where the mobile company employs people to use Twitter and other social networking media to communicate with users. After receiving complaints within minutes, Vodafone deleted the Tweet and promptly set about doing damage control. Word, however, spread pretty fast, and the company has been forced to apologize and engage in a prolonged mea culpa. In a series of direct messages to its followers, Vodafone reassured its customers that they weren't hacked, as many had suspected, and said simply, "An inappropriate message. Severe breach of rules by staff in our building, dealing with that internally. We're extremely sorry."
Vodafone later confirmed, in a press statement, that the culprit behind the fiasco "has been suspended pending further notice." As Chris Matyszczyk of CNET News points out, though, it's a bit strange that the company chose to simply suspend the employee, instead of firing him or her outright. It takes a lot for anyone to wear the black hat and play the role of head-hunter -- especially at a time when steady employment's desperately hard to come by. At the same time, though, we've gotta say that if there was ever a truly legitimate justification for firing anyone, this might be it. Not only did the tweet pop up on Vodafone's official page, it was written by someone whose sole responsibility is maintaining a healthy corporate image for the organization that puts bread on his table. [From: The Guardian; via: CNET News]





Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Pete Cosey Dead: Chicago Guitar Great and Miles Davis Collaborator Dies at 68
A Journey To The Hottest Place On Earth: Dallol Ethiopia














Comments
28
Subscribe to commentsLoriFeb 8th 2010 10:37PM
For Biggot
Homophobics are afraid that if they sanction gays, the world will become gay.
Faggots, queers, whatever term you want to call them is your choice, I suppose, but what sympathetic straight people, and gay people want homophobics to know is that if they teach our children, die in our wars, buy our goods, are upstanding citizens, they should have the same protection others have. Previously, they were tormented, even killed. People try and "convert" them to be straight. It is a homosexual's choice, it may even be their physiological make-up, to be gay. They may appear cowardly because to announce you are gay is difficult at best and might be lethal at worst. They don't go overboard, they simply want what is rightfully theirs: their place as useful citizens and the protection that we all have. Now, that isn't asking for much, is it? Call them names, it just shows intolerance and ignorance. But, don't blame them because people are homophobic.
joe tFeb 9th 2010 12:57AM
Man, you're nuts!
crksrFeb 9th 2010 1:13AM
Freedom of speech? What kind of animal is that?
JimsObieFeb 9th 2010 1:41AM
This name calling of the gay's I just don't understand. I am a Christian and I say who cares what you are. It is not up to any of us to judge you or even care about what you do as long as it is not affecting others in any way. It is up to God to judge not people. And the only difference between gay people is the way they have sex. If they didn't tell you they were gay you would not know. We all have our own quirks, mannerisms, and view on life. But the true difference is the way we have sex. Don't flaunt that to me and I won't flaunt my sex acts to you. That is MY view. No one deserves special rights because of the way they have sex. That is a private thing. Sex should stay at home and not at work. The government should stay out of it unless a crime against either of us is committed. Then the law steps in. We are becoming a world that doesn't know how to take care of itself any more because we always have our hands out for the "give me's". And soon none of us will be able to even think for our selves much less fend for our- selves. There will always be some kind of hate in this world because people seem to find it. People are the worst animal. They will find something or some one to hate just because of the "worse than animalistic" nature of us. Who knows why. If it isn't the gays it is the color of skin or religion, or side of town you grew up on or just about anything one can think up to hate. A following will be.You can be a turd and follow that hate or you can be decent and teach your family to embrace others to make a better world.
ParalegalFeb 9th 2010 2:21AM
"...'homo's'..." wasn't a possessive. He was using the apostrophe as a substitution for "sexual" in homosexual.
ParalegalFeb 9th 2010 2:29AM
Please explain why, if someone does not like "gayness," that person is considered to be a "homophobe" or a "closet homosexual?" If a person doesn't like dog fights, does that mean they secretly want to kill dogs? If a person doesn't like fish, that they secretly want to be a fish? Some guys don't like blondes, does that mean they secretly want to be a blonde woman? Some women don't like bald men. Does that mean they secretly want to be a bald man? Just because a person raises an objection does not mean that they are hiding anything. In fact, it's just the opposite.
GoCandybarFeb 9th 2010 5:41AM
I stand with # 11 and #16. the other comments are just a waste of space.
Thomas J GassettFeb 14th 2010 12:33PM
We have the right of free speech in this country, and that right comes with responsibility. One must defend the right of all speech, even speech so vile, so politically incorrect you would oppose it at the top of your lungs and for the rest of your life!
PC speech is an abomination of our rights, not enlightened, not progressive, and certainly not liberal.
Some in this country want to control the debate, even to the point of making this nonsense and issue. The real issue here is the suspension of speech, and the ill informed that so whole heartedly support it.