<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Celebrity Doppelganger Facebook Photos Could Violate Terms</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2010/02/02/celebrity-doppelganger-facebook-photos-could-violate-terms/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Celebrity Doppelganger Facebook Photos Could Violate Terms</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Celebrity Doppelganger Facebook Photos Could Violate Terms]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2010/02/02/celebrity-doppelganger-facebook-photos-could-violate-terms/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2010/02/02/celebrity-doppelganger-facebook-photos-could-violate-terms/</guid><description><![CDATA[Despite the stern boilerplate, Facebook, when reached for comment by CNET, had this to say in an email:<br><br>Users are responsible for the content they post, but as always, Facebook will respond to requests for removal that it receives from copyright holders. In this case, we have received no such requests.<br><br>yeah right, as if everyone cares about that. More details: <a href="http://bit.ly/facebook-celebrity-doppleganger-how-to-details" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/facebook-celebrity-doppleganger-how-to-details</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jerryshakalaka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2010 6:13AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
