'DVR-Proof' Commercial Kind of a Failure

Recently some ad people put together a commercial (for what looks like about a $10 budget) that is supposedly insusceptible to the powers of DVR fast-forwarding. (It's being hawked as "TiVo-proof," but that's false advertising if we've ever seen it.) With Grasshopper.com's mascot at the center of the screen for the entirety of the commercial, his face stays static while scanning through -- and will ostensibly stick in potential customers' heads.
But here's why the ad men behind this commercial have totally failed: Yes, if you are staring directly at the center of the screen while zooming through to the next scene of 'Jersey Shore' or whatever, you will have noticed the grasshopper. Seeing as the commercial is only 30 seconds long in real-time, the average couch potato's eyes will maybe grab 5 seconds max, during which they will see... a grasshopper.
Yet having now watched the commercial about a dozen times, we're still not sure what they're trying to sell. (Yeah, we could Google it, but this is rigorous scientific method stuff we're doing.) So how exactly do they expect the average viewer to have any idea what they're seeing? If the ad copy sucks in real-time, it's positively inscrutable at 4x.
We'll put forth a helpful suggestion to these ad mavericks that we think may make them shake their sorry heads in shame for not thinking of this earlier: instead of making the grasshopper static, why not make your company's name (or, for that matter, whatever it is they sell) the focal point? That's probably more valuable in terms of brand retention than a clip-art grasshopper that no one's ever seen before. Think about that the next time you try to brainwash us with your high-tech voodoo. [From: AdGabber, via: Gawker]





Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Did the Diva Diss Her Ex-Hubby With Revealing New Song?
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death














Comments
2
Subscribe to commentsDavis FreebergJan 21st 2010 10:56AM
I don't know that I would call it a failure. Just a little bit of misdirection on the part of the company. While the ad may not be TiVo proof, they did trick you into writing about by claiming that it was.
MikeeJan 21st 2010 11:52AM
That makes absolutely no sense.
If someone makes the claim that they can lift 100 pounds with their tongue, yet can't do it, writing an article about them not doing it doesn't make the failure a success.
If someone makes a "DVR-proof" commercial that isn't actually "DVR-proof" then they failed, and saying they failed doesn't change anything.
I don't know what the commercial is for, even after reading this article, so the advertising is ineffective to at least one person, and I'm willing to bet I'm not the only one that couldn't care any less about this commercial or the company behind it.