Kindle Books Outsell Physical Ones, Printing Presses Weep
Readers, we had our doubts. Sure, we've been covering the Kindle (and its e-reader spawn) ever since it first debuted, but the paper apologists among us didn't foresee the pixel trumping the pulp any time soon. Yet on Christmas Day, it happened: Amazon sold more Kindle books than physical ones. Ring the death knell for the printing press.We can imagine that the majority of these digitally downloaded texts were the result of excited new Kindle owners purchasing the latest James Patterson collection of thriller novels. But this is important for Amazon in several respects: they were able to make sales on a day when nearly every brick-and-mortar retailer was closed, and those sales were composed of the written word. Conclusion: People are still reading!
Amazon hasn't quite figured out a profitable pricing model for Kindle titles just yet. Battling higher wholesale prices from publishers, Amazon ends up eating about $1 per Kindle book sold. But the obvious popularity of digital book downloads, if Amazon can keep this momentum, will force publishers to rethink their price points.
Some of us will continue to collect printed matter until the Rapture, but things seem to be looking bright for the future of the e-reader. Are you in favor of digital books replacing paper? Can, or will, the two learn to peacefully coexist? [From: The Business Insider]





Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Grammy Red Carpet 2012 (PHOTOS)
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Diva Tricks Fans With Faux Technical Meltdown
There's only one thing to do when the Nürburgring is covered in snow...
Tips for flying cheaper in 2012
Tax Reform in This Election Year: It's Not Likely














Comments
1
Subscribe to commentsGordon JulianDec 28th 2009 5:14PM
As is well known, the rationale is obvious for publishing electronic books. E-books need no paper for distributiion, thus saving trees and other plants used for this purpose. They also require no binding or shipping and corrections can be made in an instant with the purchasers being alerted. Libraries, which could benefit most, considering their space requirements will, of course, have to wait until more people have this technology for downloading; although they might provide a few library-owned e-books for checking out. I suppose when books first appeared, people didn't want to give up having scrolls since they don't require turning pages.