Then and Now: How Far We Are From Y2K, and the Tech That Got Us Here

Not to sound overly obvious, but the last decade has changed everything -- the way we think and interact with one another, the way we work and play -- more so than any 10-year span of the last century. So we investigate the fact that, in many ways and without us even noticing, technology has become front and center in our lives, and how vastly different the end of the first decade of the new millennium was from the beginning. With the first generation of children who have never used a VHS or won't remember Apple as a Macintosh finally hitting computing age, we take stock in how the world has evolved. So think about yourself then and now, and remember, like Prince says, make sure to party like it's 199--, er, 2009.
WORK:

Our view on 2000's laptops are akin to that era's view on brick-like cell phones: what ancient, strange devices they were. The ThinkPad was a popular, clunky model, and only serious business travelers would shell out the thousands of dollars to use such a bulky object. Serious work was done on an "old school," curved CRT monitor. The end of the 20th century was a dark time for Apple, which only had education, publishing, and a motley crew of überfans as major consumers. Though Steve Jobs returned in 1996, he spent years pulling it back from the brink of obsolescence. The first iMac didn't land until 1998, and went through several changes before being accepted by a larger audience. The market, for the most part, was completely Windows-saturated.

Now: VAIOs and Inspirons, Wi-Fi, BlackBerrys, the all-in-one iPhone
You'll find the Switched office working diligently... on laptops (the exception being our Editor-In-Chief, who does some heavy Pro-level lifting). Our computers snap shut and start up quickly, and a lack of free Wi-Fi usually gets us whining. The business landscape has changed, thanks to modern mobility. This means cheaper labor -- interns can bring their own computers or more workers stay at home. Also, we are constantly on the go, using smart phones to check e-mail or transfer money into bank accounts. The phone has finally become what it always should have been -- a way to get on to the Internet.
While PCs are still the large portion of the market, the average individual doesn't recoil in horror when someone pulls out a MacBook. Most can manage their way around either graphical interface, but take a vehement liking to one over the other.
ENTERTAINMENT:

The idea of downloading music, to a year 2000 dweller, was not absurd. Napster was at the fingertips of those in the know, and if you could tolerate the 96 kbps sound quality, there were virtual libraries to be pillaged. But that was still the era of collecting: old VHS tapes were slowly being replaced by expensive DVDs (but we still needed tapes for recording 'Party of Five' if we couldn't be home), books and books (remember those?) of CDs organized (if you are like us, with corresponding inner sleeves), and so many discarded AA batteries.

Now: Digital Collections, Downloading to Get it Now, Hulu
The idea of someone staying home to watch 'True Blood' is baffling. In fact, a show can be a hit even if no one tunes in, thanks to TiVo -- and now Hulu, iTunes, and (not that we condone it) illegal downloading. In fact, most people born after 1980 have probably, at some point, engaged or illegal downloading (or have had friends who experimented). Our bitrate-obsessed culture has made us increasingly aware of quality and speed. Collections have become entirely digital, and thanks to next-gen consoles like Xbox and PS3, even our video games can be downloaded.
iPod, YouPod, WeAllPod
No matter how good the reviews are or how cheap the gadget is, nothing has encroached on the iPod's market share. MP3s have become synonymous with the player, which essentially allowed MP3-purchasing sites like iTunes and Amazon to be successful. The MP3 made the iPod possible, but the iPod made the MP3 successful. Of course, the way we listen changed as well, with individuals considering music in terms of singly purchased songs, instead of entire, CD-contained albums.
Broader than Broadband
The need for speed (constantly being fed by Internet accessible devices) was a distant future for late-20th-century residents, who knew something must be faster, but had to deal with the daunting dial-tone of molasses-slow modems. However, with faster speeds came more information -- making the computer central to the way we entertain ourselves.
TRAVEL:

Then: Calling Airlines, Check-In Lines, Relaxed Departure and Easy Carry-Ons
Any American decade retrospective has to take the most ground-breaking event of the last 10 years into perspective: On September 11, 2001, this country's way of travel was irrevocably changed. No more walking Grandma to her gate. Also available in 2000 were travel agents, liquids on-board carry-ons, and it was possible to fly in a smoking section internationally. There also weren't looming threat "orange level alerts" during travels.

Now: Relaxed Planning, Nothing Over 6 Oz. of Liquid
Travel agencies are all but extinct thanks to sites like Kayak, Hotwire, and Priceline. The irony of flying in a post 9/11 world is that, while traveling itself has become more regulated and thorough in safety procedures, it's easier than ever to buy a ticket: it's possible to even do it on a phone, and if you plan correctly, you can make it through an airport without speaking to anyone besides the security agent. Which doesn't make it easier to fly, of course.
COMMUNICATION:

Though cell phones weren't as rampant as they are now (many invested after 9/11), the popular phone of the early millennium was the Nokia 3310. With interchangeable faceplates (the author had a glittery purple one), they were simple and straightforward with a pea-green screen and that catchy ringtone. Text messaging was a fairly easy thing to understand (remember, there were two-way pagers), but not as useful as today. Oh, and lastly -- cell phones weren't reliable. People turned them off when not in use, and most were employed for outgoing, not incoming, calls. Lastly, this year marked the death of Geocities, and with it, the sparkling on-page graphics associated with Web sites of yore.

Now: Facebook, Do Everything Phones and a Whole New Social Networking World
Nothing has changed as much as the way we communicate. 'The Twitter' has taken the Web by storm, you don't exist unless you have a Facebook profile (and the last 10 years saw the rise and fall of Friendster and MySpace first). Texting is an obvious addition, but imagine explaining to your ten-years-younger self that you 'poked' someone online or that your mom has learned Internet chat.
What this means is that everything is recorded. With digital cameras, we upload memories as we make them, share experiences with friends across the globe, and always remember birthdays (often sending messages of commemoration). A best friend can be in Singapore. Your mother knows what you and your new boyfriend did on a date last night. And finally, you can prove that your high school crush fortunately peaked in high school.
THINKING:

Once upon a time, we were a unique, articulate, rational people. We knew how to find things with maps, and we would be wowed by someone's 300+ CD collection. If we didn't know something small -- like what would happen if we hired two private investigators to follow each other -- we either did some clever querying on our CD-ROM encyclopedia, or we just didn't know it. Our senses of humor didn't include the word FAIL and witnessing a keyboard-playing cat required one heck of a talented cat. Basically, our quest for knowledge wasn't immediately gratified.. and we were OK with that.

A new word has entered the lexicon: Google (noun and verb). MVP of the Boston Red Sox in 1976? Google it. Want to find others interested in classic Malaysian dance in Philadelphia? Find them on Yelp. Wanna see Snooki get slugged? YouTube it. The world is at your fingertips, which can feel incredibly daunting. No matter what, someone's blog will always be better or more popular, someone else will get the scoop on the new 'Spiderman' movie before you, someone else has written the wiki before you even knew what a Wikipedia was.
YouTube Stars and Blogging Celebrities
Since every painful thing you ever wanted to know -- about the world, about your exes' new flame, about Mighty Mouse -- is on the Net, we've begun to think in status updates: 'Ugh, this plane is late. #FML' or 'We're official. It says so on Facebook.' Any person with a computer can write a blog, any Joe with a cell cam can take a life-changing picture, any funny talent can bring YouTube fame. With the Net, we are always performing for our legions of friends and followers (or our moms. Whatever).
Here's some food for thought: In 2000, if you asked us what a footprint was, we'd remark it's something we left in the sand. Today, we might respond it's how we are traced, and how far our impact is felt, digitally and throughout the world. And that's a lot to think about.
Related Links:







Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Can You Guess This Famous Face?
The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Savings Experiment: Snow Removal
Tips for flying cheaper in 2012
It's Pink!
James Sturm Boycotts 'The Avengers' Film over Marvel's Treatment of Jack Kirby
Alleged Squatters Found With Drugs, Handgun, Grenades, Pig
There's only one thing to do when the Nürburgring is covered in snow...














Comments
47
Subscribe to commentsjelaime2Dec 27th 2009 6:57AM
The new spam.
mitchell567gDec 27th 2009 8:02AM
Now: Google Addicts, Wiki Weirdos, Immediate YouTube Gratification
A new word has entered the lexicon: Google (noun and verb). MVP of the Boston Red Sox in 1976? Google it. Want to find others interested in classic Malaysian dance in Philadelphia? Find them on Yelp. Wanna see Snooki get slugged? YouTube it. The world is at your fingertips, which can feel incredibly daunting. No matter what, someone's blog will always be better or more popular, someone else will get the scoop on the new 'Spiderman' movie before you, someone else has written the wiki before you even knew what a Wikipedia was.
mitchell567gDec 27th 2009 8:03AM
Here's some food for thought: In 2000, if you asked us what a footprint was, we'd remark it's something we left in the sand. Today, we might respond it's how we are traced, and how far our impact is felt, digitally and throughout the world. And that's a lot to think about.
dsang4Dec 28th 2009 8:25AM
All we can do is embrace it. When born we are subjected to an already evolutionized society...we just so happened to step into the more advanced now. But we have to inform ourselves about nature, surround ourselves with it in order to appreciate it...and teach ourselves and others to maintain it...See Avatar A.S.A.P.
B. DAYDec 27th 2009 9:51AM
I'm a senior citizen (70+) and I am savvy on the computer and cell phones. But don't kid yourselves, everyone in the "now" generation is missing life big time. I remember cranking phones, getting an operator, having party lines, having to go to someone's house to visit, writing letters, sending cards. Sure, that was back in the dark ages but people connected personally with other people. It was all much more satisfying. Granted, technology has improved our lives in many ways, but did we lose more than we gained?
RiriDec 27th 2009 10:26AM
.B. Day, I am less than half your age, 25, and I can tell you honestly that the 'crazy' generation would ask, write letters?! Why?! Yes, I can imagine that we missed out on a lot but evolution does happen (sometimes it leaves even 'us' scratching our heads). However, I am more than glad that your generation can reminiscence the good ol' days, I have a feeling we might need those when going back to basics would be essential in our day to day lives
MaryDec 27th 2009 10:27AM
AMEN, bother!
TanikaDec 27th 2009 10:28AM
I think you are right B.Day, I'm 31 and although I'm a little hip to the tech world, I remember a lot of things that we did when we were younger that these kids nowadays don't have a clue about. They have no imagination, they don't play outside with their friends, no one writes letters, or call on the phone or do anything simple. It's all done online or texting. It's seems as if technology has made us lazy in some ways.
eckerson2006Dec 27th 2009 10:32AM
i agree with you, we are sacrificing a lot. being a photographer, i realize this more than anyone. the magic is disappearing from photography with the start of digital cameras and cell cams. it's more convenient, true, but you can't watch the photograph come to life from a white sheet of paper in a dark room anymore. Now you watch it upload into your computer, and whether it's printed by a printer or ends up on facebook, it's already on your computer. No need for developing film. Some things just can't be replaced.
JenDec 27th 2009 11:35AM
Bday..although I'm 41, I can understand what you are saying. I wonder sometimes if people would ever be able to communicate one on one with one another. When trying to make conversation with people, they seem annoyed to be bothered by a real human being. However, if their cellphone rings, or Blackberry goes off, they jump on that interruption. Younger people seem to have trouble just communicating. Go to McDonald's or their place of work and sure enough they are texting at an alarming rate, however they can't seem to say a simple hello to you as they take your order. At some point the entire grid will go down, and who then will be able to handle the "old fashioned" way!
JTDec 27th 2009 1:44PM
Amen Sister. I'm 49 I held out till 2001 before giving into a cellphone as a Manhattanite there was a payphone every 20' & I don't stay friends for long with people who refuse to pick up a telephone with some regularity but only communicate with email or worse texting which I refuse to do.
The Internet has virtually set us back socially to the pre-telephone days. I wonder what Alexander Graham Bell is thinking looking at this nonsense for all the work he did to allow us to HEAR each other.
It's sad. Really is.
And even at my age I say a birthday or any occasion that ever called for a hand written "Snail-mailed" card still does call for at least that. And email is shows no thought or effort since we know the sender fires off a few dozen to a few hundred a day without a thought. I don't care what Dear Abby & Ann Lander's Daughters say about us having to bow to the times.
The Internet's made thoughtlessness, coldness & lack of interpersonal relations all but extinct. And when I say Interpersonal I say that's wide open for interpretation.
babyazul79Dec 27th 2009 12:34PM
I am 30, and yes we have lost more than we've gained....I miss connecting with people the old way, and refuse to text like most people I know. You want to tell me something, then call me. Thanks for the post.
PoKeDec 27th 2009 12:52PM
I'm a young person, 17. (Wow, I still feel old) and I am slightly hurt that so many of you think that my generation is either illiterate or has no imagination. When I was younger my friends and I would all go out and play all sorts of games. Harry Potter? Come on, that was a HUGE boost to our imaginations. Everyone used to pretend that they were Harry Potter characters (I miss those days). While I don't disagree that a large majority of us are indeed illiterate... my friends and I don't really understand this chat speak and we've grown up with it. You have to be a MAJOR gamer to really understand l33t sp33k (I don't get it at all). But I think mobile phones really help us, as does the internet. With facebook it's really easy to get people together, same with twitter and mobile phones. If you want to get a group of people together for a fun event FAST then you just text, tweet, or post a message on Facebook and pretty soon you've got a whole party of people together!
While we do text people while in the presence of others, it's not a problem. People understand. Plus, it's a GREAT way to keep in contact with your close friends. Seriously. I love it. And I don't think it has any real problem with our imagination, as I stated previously. I know I'm being redundant, but that's because this is a redundant subject.
Also, an interjection about the issue of having knowledge at our fingertips -- what's the problem with knowing things? I personally love being able to text google if I have a question and being able to look up great restaurants in an instant is a fun way to find new places to go. Learning is the one thing that I, and many other people that I know, enjoy about our lives more than anything. And it's GREAT to know that I can find out about African Fish etc. by the touch of a button.
One thing I DON'T like is how teens text while driving -- I put my mobile in the back of my car on silent while I'm driving and it would be nice if others would do this as well.
Denise MajorsDec 27th 2009 1:01PM
Just because something is different doesn't make it better or worse. Now I can keep in touch, or even just find people a lot faster than you ever could. I mean people I went to grammar school with I just found on Facebook. You could never do that before, they were just lost. Plus, I have more "friends" than ever and can keep everyone up to date with just one posting. I think the new stuff is awesome, and it doesn't make my relationships any less meaningful because you don't "see" them. I contend that you do see them through videos or pictures that they post, and keeps you in touch.
gr8bsnDec 27th 2009 1:37PM
31 years old here, and I agree completely. Being born in 1978, I have been through several technological transitions. I can tell you that my social life was far more active BEFORE cell phones than it was AFTER. I think that because people have a tendency to be able to hear from you 24/7 now, it is much easier to blow people off. Calling someone or writing a letter (what we would call an email now) was a far more deliberate choice, because you had to really sit down and take some time to do it. Once plans were in place for an evening and people were heading out, you were committed to keeping them.
Overall, I'm thankful for computers and cell phones (you couldn't pay me to touch a coin operated disease factory ever again), but the side effect is a ruder culture.
samburger077Dec 27th 2009 1:56PM
I still write letters to my friend in the Army. She doesn't have a cell phone or internet or even a computer to use it on. And she is 18. The simplicity of your generation still exists in a few people.
monteDec 27th 2009 11:20AM
as good as some of this is ,I am no slave to it. my cell phone for example I go see a movie it stays in the car,anyone calls leave a message. I find it funny the people that walk around with it like a cell phone life support device. its anoying too. I am going to get a blocker soon dont care if its illegal and if your within 60 feet of me in the theatre you will not be using your phone.
BruceDec 27th 2009 11:37AM
What if someone needs you for an emergency?
JTDec 27th 2009 1:44PM
I'm with you. "Life support device". I love that.
Hey if you find one of those blockers. Let me know. I'd like to know why every state isn't seeing the revenue bonanza in setting down laws against driving phone in hand and really making it priority #1 for all patrol cars. I can't remember the last time I saw a women in a car without a phone in her hand and the more stupid the driving behavior the more sure you can be that when you see the driver they'll be on the phone. They say in the future they'll plant blockers in the paving of roads. Well the technology exists and we need jobs so there's a public works project that only morons and narcissistic idiots would not applaud!
JenDec 27th 2009 11:43AM
you are so right! unfortunately the advances in technology are happening at a far greater rate then simple ettiquete can keep up. People talk on their phones everywhere so loudly that it's amazing to me that they don't care who listens or knows what's going on in their lives. Especially when you pay as much as you do to see a movie and some butthole tells the ending to his friend who he's talking to online. The texting during a movie is just as annoying, all that bright light is distracting.