Judges, Lawyers Can Never Be Facebook Friends in Florida

Facebook and the workplace have never been exactly the best of buddies. Facebook/co-worker protocol deemed "acceptable" varies widely by occupation or sector. But for lawyers and judges in Florida, the choice is simple: Facebook's one thing, the courtroom's another. And nary the twain shall meet.
The New York Times reports Florida's Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee recently published an opinion barring any virtual "friendship" between judges and lawyers. In the committee's view, Facebook friendship between the two suggests a conflict of interest, "reasonably convey[ing] to others the impression that these lawyer 'friends' are in a special position to influence the judge." The minority opinion countered that Facebook friendship generally suggests that two people are mere acquaintances, not outright BFFs. The majority of the committee members felt that leaving this area shaded gray would make the courts vulnerable to accusations of impropriety. Judge T. Michael Jones, a committee member himself, reiterated that the ruling was just advisory, as a recommendation, not a requirement. And lawyers worried about dwindling friend lists needn't worry; brown-nosing barristers can still become "fans" of judges on Facebook.
Stephen Gillers, legal expert at NYU, thinks the decision was "hypersensitive," and posited that the ruling was the direct result of a generational gap that clouded the committee's understanding of Facebook friendship. We agree. As Gillers points out, judges don't "drop out of society when they become judges. The people who were their friends before they went on the bench remained their friends, and many of them were lawyers." So if anything, wouldn't the Florida legal system be more transparent if judiciary Facebook friendship was permitted? Instead of banning Facebook in a lame attempt to mask any behind-the-bench "friendships," Florida courts should face the reality of social networking's prevalence, and the fact that, hey, they all went to law school together. [From: The New York Times]





St. Louis Sports Bar Gives Man Receipt Criticizing His Child
'Undercover Boss': Top 4 Moments From Season 4 [VIDEO]
Las Vegas Court Officials Accused Of Covering Up Sex Assault [VIDEO]
Groomers Lose Dog, Claim Not Responsible
Walmart vs. Costco: How Do They Really Compare?
'Lone Ranger' Star Johnny Depp Opens Up About Split From Vanessa Paradis
The Story Behind Shapewear: From Girdles to Spanx
'Grease' Cast: Where Are They Now?
Male Judge Sets Dress Code For Female Lawyers And Sparks Uproar
Careless Chinese Baggage Handler Really Throws Himself Into His Work












Comments
3
Subscribe to commentsrockefellafilthDec 16th 2009 6:12AM
This is another disinformation Bulls??t story,... it is common knowledge that Judges and lawyers are already Partners in crime within the a scam known as the Judicial system. The Constitution has been suspended since 1933 and civil court has been replaced with administration court. When you come before a judge, you are witnessing an actor playing a part in the court of the Military-industrial complex.
KittenDec 15th 2009 7:27AM
3 comments and 3 ads....This is the stuff AOL needs to make changes to not changing the way we see our e-mail. Fix what is broken before making changes to what isn't broke!!!
chililuverDec 15th 2009 8:49AM
I so agree. Right now, you are the only one out of six you have not tried to spam. I always report the spammers to AOL several times. I am beginning to see less and less of these jerks in the evening, and more of "comment has been deleted", so hopefully other readers have been doing the same.