<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Judge Rejects Record Industry's Attempt To Silence Student</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/12/09/judge-rejects-record-industrys-attempt-to-silence-student/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Judge Rejects Record Industry's Attempt To Silence Student</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge Rejects Record Industry's Attempt To Silence Student]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/12/09/judge-rejects-record-industrys-attempt-to-silence-student/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/12/09/judge-rejects-record-industrys-attempt-to-silence-student/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's the problem, and that's what the judge laments. You say that jaywalking and stealing are pretty much the same. It's pretty scary to think that a whole generation believes that. <br><br>Jaywalking, if it ever actually appears in any city code today, was likely outlawed to protect people from themselves. I suspect the law came about back when cars were relatively uncommon and people just sort of wandered across streets knowing that a horse would generally slow down or otherwise avoid them. <br><br>Stealing (what you casually refer to as "file sharing") is just what it is - taking something that isn't yours without paying for it. Unfortunately, it seems that very few people these days have ever actually had to work very hard at anything and thus they cannot comprehend the significance of having something stolen from them. <br><br>Having said that, I too applaud the judge's refusal to overstep her bounds and trample Tenenbaum's free speech rights. I also partly fault the record industry for failing to protect their merchandise, especially when they know (or ought to know) that their target market thinks stealing stuff is "no biggie." ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Judge Rejects Record Industry's Attempt To Silence Student]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/12/09/judge-rejects-record-industrys-attempt-to-silence-student/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/12/09/judge-rejects-record-industrys-attempt-to-silence-student/</guid><description><![CDATA[File sharing isn't the same as stealing....or at least not the same as what people traditionally think of as stealing.  If I don't pony up the dough, I'll never get a big screen plasma HDTV in my house without stealing one. However, all I have to do is turn on the (very free) radio, and with a little bit of station-hopping and patience, I can pretty much hear any song I want...for free.  Internet radio makes finding free broadcasts of rare/obscure songs and genres easier to find than ever before.  I can have friends over and let them listen with me to both types of radio, also for free, and I can do that as often as I want without ever paying a cent. (Outside of the cost of the radio or computer/internet service, of course.)   If I download a song that I can hear for free 10 times a day on public radio, is that really the same as "taking something that isn't yours without paying for it?"  If I was busting out my old tape recorder and making cassettes, I'm not sure people would be so willing to say it was, and that's what puts this issue in a grey area for so many people these days.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 6:50PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
