<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Sick Social Networkers Raise Ethical Questions For Docs</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/12/04/sick-social-networkers-raise-ethical-questions-for-docs/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Sick Social Networkers Raise Ethical Questions For Docs</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sick Social Networkers Raise Ethical Questions For Docs]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/12/04/sick-social-networkers-raise-ethical-questions-for-docs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/12/04/sick-social-networkers-raise-ethical-questions-for-docs/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm actually curious to know what they plan for the opposite.  I commented last week on my twitter that I'd caught a cold and instantly was bombarded by several doctors (none of which I knew) who were wanting me to come see them immediately.  A few were clearly spammers (never bothered to see my profile and where I lived), but the majority were local ones.  If regulators are going to be concerned about things like the above, it needs to be said that it cuts both ways.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanskrit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 10:02AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
