Is the Leica M9 Worth the Hype?

Leica M9 Digital Rangefinder Camera
What it is:
The cult of Leica originated in the '40s, when Henri Cartier-Bresson and the Magnum photographers first brought the so-called "decisive moment" into the cultural consciousness. Their startlingly immediate images of street life, war, and people are as fresh today as they were the day they were snapped. The weapon of choice for this school of photographers was the Leica rangefinder, a small, lightweight camera that offered photojournalists an easy way to capture high-quality pictures on the move. Though the film era may be waning, Leica is now producing rangefinders for the era of digital photography, and the M9 is its latest entry into the category. This $7,000 camera is for folks who are serious about their still photography; the M9 doesn't do video.Rangefinders work in a way fundamentally different from what we've come to accept as standard camera functionality. A standard viewfinder displays only what is in the frame, meaning that elements outside of lens range aren't seen. Therefore, the shot you see in the viewfinder is the shot you get. With a rangefinder, however, you look through a viewfinder that is aligned with the lens but not connected; small marks on the glass delineate the area in frame, with space around the marks remaining visible, allowing you to look further afield when composing the shot. When you drop the shutter, there is no moment of blackness. This lets you focus on your next shot without that momentary disorientation.
Leica has always delivered the gold standard for rangefinders, and remains one of the few companies manufacturing the devices in digital form. The German-made Leica lenses are ground to legendarily precise specifications, and remain arguably the best glass out there. Leica users' impassioned fervor for the lenses borders on religious devotion.
Why it's different:
The M9's focusing mechanism consists of two squares in the viewfinder that you can line up in the middle of the frame with a bayonet focus control. The actual distance marks on the lens dial become a vital cue for focusing. That being the case, with enough practice, you'll be able to literally shoot from the hip. It's that quality that makes rangefinders excellent for on-the-fly street photography.Unlike the M8, the M9's 18-megapixel Kodak-developed CCD sensors are now full-frame at 24-by-36mm (the same size as a 35mm, old school, film-based rangefinder). This means that not only is all the visual information included in wide-angle shots, but also that any classic lens made for Leica's film cameras will work seamlessly on the M9. Since rangefinders forgo the mirror-based mechanics of an SLR, rangefinders are extremely quiet, meaning they're ideal for situations where you don't want to make noise. They are also good for low-light situations and wide-angle photography.
To simplify ISO (light sensitivity) control issues, Leica placed an ISO button on the back of the camera. The simple adjustment eliminates the need to navigate complicated menus to change the light sensitivity -- a major hassle on the M8.
What we like:
Besides the advantages provided by the aforementioned full-frame sensor, the M9 is -- at a slender weight of 20.6 ounces and dimensions of 5.47-by-1.45-by-3.15 inches -- small, light, discreet, and ultra powerful. Once you get the hang of the thing, grabbing that shot is fast as hell. The compact, lightweight Leica lenses (coupled with upgraded sensors) deliver stunning imagery well beyond the capabilities of a similarly-sized Nikon or Canon.Photo quality aside, the camera is a delight for anyone who considers himself a serious photographer and wants a high degree of manual, old-school-style customization. Rather than digging through endless menus in search of settings, you make most of your technical choices before you ever compose the shot. The old-fashioned light meter achieves simplicity; it tells you if you're under, over, or just right. Adjusting often-automated settings such as aperture, shutter speed, or ISO is totally up to you. Various auto functions do exist, but, as any Leica user will tell you, you should be prepared to go all manual once you venture into this level of photography.
Despite its high learning curve, the M9 is still simpler to operate than a Canon or Nikon DSLR of similar quality. It distills all the menus of newer cameras, and offers a simple, elegant interface that delivers all the same functions.
It's half as heavy as most DSLRs, too, and the featherweight lenses don't add to the heft. There's no need to put this down from neck strain. Discrete and unarguably stylish, those who know cameras will be thoroughly impressed. (Not that that's why you'd spend $7,000, of course, but it is a nice perk.)
What we don't like:
While sticking the dedicated ISO button on the back of the camera was an improvement over its previous, deep-within-menus location, ISO changes still require more clicks than they should. Though battery life has been criticized by some, charging the camera for longer than the recommended 3.5 hours left ample juice for a day's worth of shooting. Using the zoom function in playback mode takes a few seconds, slightly undermining the benefits of instant review.Focusing in low light, a difficulty intrinsic to rangefinders, definitely takes practice. There's also no getting around the M9's punishing price tag of $7,000. And that doesn't even include lenses, which start at $1,995, with specialty models fetching around $6,000.
What it costs:
$7,000.Does it live up to the hype?
The M9, a the culmination of a lot of back and forth on Leica and Kodak's part and a lot of critiques from users, delivers mind-bogglingly good electronics in a slender body with uncommonly fine lenses, and an interface that deftly melds the classic rangefinder design with the digital platform. The camera synthesizes the virtues of a classic film camera with the best assets of the digital world, delivering a new kind of hybrid that turns the entire paradigm of digital photography back around to a more manual one. It will be a long time before the M9 is trumped for power, portability and image quality.That said, this camera is not for most. Only those with deep pockets and a serious love of photography need apply.






The List #0147: Escape a Car Underwater
Visit the Maldive Islands Before It's Too Late
Reptiles Make Home in UK Man's Cable Box
Springtime Budget-Busters -- Savings Experiment
Distraught Mom Becomes Face of Oklahoma Storm
Is This Woman Too Pretty To Work?
Mariah Carey Suffers Wardrobe Malfunction on Good Morning America
The Story Behind Hairspray
Carrie Underwood Donates $1 Million to Oklahoma Tornado Victims
Watch a rocket-powered bicycle set a new land speed record















Comments
11
Subscribe to commentsa4skyhawkdriverDec 3rd 2009 4:53PM
As a photographer for over 38 years, and during that time having worked as a full time commercial professional, I just cannot fathom paying those kind of prices for a camera that is so very limited in it's abilities. Sure, there are some nice attributes including the light weight and incredibly high quality glass, but the limitations more than counter the benefits. To make a statement that the Leica is easier to use than a Nikon or Canon DSLR is ludicrous on it's face value and just plain silly upon closer examination. ANY DSLR from Nikon or Canon can be shot in a fully automated way that will typically produce well exposed shots under most conditions by complete novices 85% of the time. That's not to say that they will be well composed or interesting (that's where the skill of the shooter comes into play). The biggest reason for being that the Leica M9 has is it's snob appeal and quaint retrograde simplicity. For $7000 plus lenses, it offers no performance capabilities over that of a consumer grade medium priced DSLR from Canon or Nikon camera body matched up with good glass for $1000 plus lenses.
CamilleDec 31st 2009 1:58PM
I am trying to understand your point, should Leica make a cheap all-automated M9 for novices? Or do you say that the quality of a camera is gauged by the number of features it has?
Sorry, I don't get it. As a user of a Leica M6, the real limitation I experienced was the time spent processing and scanning my films. This camera has manual focus, manual speed, manual aperture, and a very primitive but powerful light sensor. I have never felt limited in any way, on the contrary I feel in control of the pictures I take.
Really, this is just a matter of taste: I am ready to pay a lot of money to use the outstanding lenses that the M system has. With a Fuji Velvia 50 this is just heaven.
I have recently ordered a M9, and I am looking forward to take great pictures on the road.
K. PraslowiczDec 3rd 2009 10:06PM
If I were to win an M9, I'm sure I'd love it. Until then, I'll stick with my trusty old M6. At the rate I consume film, not purchasing an M9 will keep me stocked for nearly a decade if prices stay stable. Given the turn over of Digital camera bodies, I doubt any M9 will last that long and still be considered acceptable.
Thomas HoustonDec 4th 2009 8:30AM
How long have you had your M6?
GeorgeDec 4th 2009 12:13AM
I own a 1Ds Mark III and now a lovely black M9.
The M9 isn't about feature set or "performance capabilities". It's about a style of shooting. A rangefinder is a liberating shooting experience for the documentary photographer. There is a good chance I'll get a 2nd M9 body and shoot my entire 2010 wedding season with the cameras.
Anyone that would call a camera "snobby" is missing the point entirely.
The M8 is to the M5 what the M9 is to the M6.
a couple of 1Ds3's for sale............. :)
BrianDec 21st 2009 11:07AM
As a leica owner its not about "features", its about raw photography, its about being there and getting the shots, its about world class build quality, its about having a camera for life and knowing it as a musician would know their instrument. you don't judge instruments by their features (unless you are more of a geek and less of an artist.)
There is also a certian character about leica glass you cant put your finger on, it looks more expensive, its sharp without ever being harsh, the bokeh is smooth and never lumpy.
Plus thats not even mentioning that getting slr quality images in a camera setup a 1/3 of the size and sometimes a 1/4 of the weight is liberating. That and its inconspicuous my friend and i used to do allot of street photography together, and i can tell you they would see me a mile off with my nikon big black dslr of death ..most of the time he could get away with allot more ... sometimes sticking the camera within inches of their faces and they wouldn't notice...or care.
lookDec 4th 2009 5:15AM
As an International Fashion, Beauty and People photographer for 23 Years with works published in very prestigious media throughout the world, and having worked with Nikons and Canons Medium format and large format throughout my career but then having landed on the M6 12 years ago and then the M8 and now the M9 which by some amazing image recording capability made me reject all the material I was using and exclusively settling on the M, and having done unlimited amounts of photo-shoots all over the world and in the most difficult lighting situations, where the Leica images shone like Jewels with their fine subtle recording of light where other brands were struggling to record some light, I can assure you that the M9 outshines the SLRs by far and even is on Par with the Top Medium Format Brands. Anyone who has not tried the M system will not understand what it's all about: "The passion for photography" and the M forces you to think and appreciate your image.
Anyway, M cameras are like Patek Philip or Rolex watches to cameras where the Japanese are like Seiko or Casio. Both are reliable, but one is made with passion for passionate people and one is made by Robots for the masses.
Bill Mc GowanDec 12th 2009 3:52PM
Hey "look." It must be special to live among the elite effetes as you do. Just wonderful as you watch the hoi polli stumble with their clumsy fingers on their humble Nikon SLR's. ROTFLMAO.
arnoldmercDec 21st 2009 4:43PM
As someone who shot theatre action during performances with my M-3 I can tell you that shooting with a SLR or DSLR during a show would sound like I was shooting of a 45 automatic. The M-3 was stolen from me and if I win the Lotto I'll get an M-9 with multiple lenses, no zoom lenses.
silvermoonDec 30th 2009 2:12AM
I am quite happy with my stupid DSLR, thank you.
ninefiveoneFeb 20th 2010 11:58AM
Price aside, DSLRs and Range Finders have their place.
Just like how a carpenter will have different tools for different jobs or applications.
I own both, Leica and Nikon D3 and they serve for different purposes. Both extremely excellent for what they were designed to do.