<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</guid><description><![CDATA[South Park didnt come up with Kick a Ginger day... Some random punks did...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[numerwan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 24th 2009 9:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</guid><description><![CDATA[South Park popularized the hatred. They make lots of money by selling air-time to sponsors, which means that the show gets people to buy things simply by being aired at the same time as the show;  so it's absurd to claim that they have no responsibility for the influence they have over people regarding things that are actually ON the show. <br><br>If that's the case, then you must believe that the sponsors are buying air-time during South Park for the pure fun of it, and throwing away their money, since you're claiming that the show has no influence with viewers regarding the purchase of products advertised during it. <br><br>Likewise, this episode was clearly different than others; while others are satirical in that the mean the OPPOSITE of what they say, this one this one indicated that parents of redheads really DO hate their kids; and nothing really bad happened to Cartman in the  end-- he just got away with his hate. Meanwhile they wouldn't have DARED to make these statements about any other group.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2010 11:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</guid><description><![CDATA[A hate crime is when a person is targeted based on his membership in a social group.  This kid was targeted specifically because he was a red-head. If it was any other racial or social minority in this country, these kids could be accused of a hate crime.  What a double standard in LA Sheriff's office.  Each of these kids AND their parents should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.  A message needs to be sent that hate crime in ANY form is not tolerated (except maybe in Calabassas).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 24th 2009 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed, they should be sued for unequal protection under the law, a civil rights violation and federal offense.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2010 8:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</guid><description><![CDATA[The very idea of a "hate crime" is dumb.  Really.  It is.  Think about it - a guy robs a store vs a guy robs a store he "hates" -- end result, he still robbed a store....or a guy kills someone vs a guy kills someone he hates -- end result, he's still a murderer.  What are you going to do, hang them twice?  Just punish according to the existing law people.....why is that so hard to figure out?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dumb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 27th 2009 12:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, people who don't understand logic are dumb. A hate-crime is based on hatred of a group, and so it is not simply a crime against one person, but every member of that group as well; and they have the right to be PROTECTED against that, by increasing the punishment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2010 11:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is absolutely a "hate crime" as that term is defined (although I find the term sort of stupid since you can hardly call assaults, murders, etc. anything but hateful). <br><br>What I'm really left wondering is whether this was a real beat-down or just some annoying punches and kicks. There is a difference although neither should be tolerated in a school. Was this red-headed kid seriously hurt, or was he just tired of the stupidity - like the one kid who forgets to wear green on St. Patty's day and gets sick of being pinched all day? <br><br>At the end of the day, I'd have to agree that this all boils down to poor parenting - again. (This is just me, but I wouldn't even let my kids watch South Park. I get that their Ginger Day episode was satirical - I just think it's a stupid show. And, I think there are more productive things my kids could be doing than watching cartoons.) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 24th 2009 1:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</guid><description><![CDATA[Double-standards come from hypocrisy, i.e. people not being seriously opposed to prejudice, discrimination and hate, but also not wanting to admit it; and so they rationalize why protected groups SHOULD be protected, but how unprotected groups shouldn't; and it's easy for them to find some reason, however flimsy. Blacks and Jews are easy, being well-sung victims; meanwhile the hypocrites will say that other ethnic-groups should be protected because they're ethnic, and that "redheads aren't TECHNICALLY an ethnic-group etc." or that "redheads weren't SYSTEMATICALLY oppressed," or any other handy excuse for their double-standard. <br>Hypocrites obviously aren't interested in logic, since they're obviously WRONG; they just want to make excuses for their double-standards; a hypocrite is, by  definition, a PHONY-- again, they WANT to be prejudiced and bigoted, and to rationalize their hate against someone; but they are also cowards, and so don't want anyone to hold it against them. So they cowardly attack only "safe" targets, i.e. those whom society labels as being safe to hate-- which USED to include blacks and Jews, as well as other ethnic-groups and women etc, but now is pretty much down to redheads as a genome-related group.<br><br>This is the perpetual defense I see of the double-standards of why hating redheads "isn't as bad as racism--" i.e. the hypocrites cherry-pick the details, while ignoring the ethical principle that it's not about the effect, but the principle of hating and defaming a group  because they look different. It doesn't matter how bad some ethnic group USED TO BE treated, that doesn't justify treating redheads worse NOW... but the hypocrites seem to think so. That's what makes them hypocrites: they don't care about right and wrong, just APPEARING right to others.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2010 11:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Facebook and 'South Park' Blamed for Anti-Redhead Assault]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/24/facebook-and-south-park-blamed-for-anti-redhead-assault/</guid><description><![CDATA[Better becareful red heads were knowing as sexual witches in the 1800s... I wouldn't mess with me ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[christina kerr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 14th 2010 12:30PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
