Download the new Switched app for your iPhone

Skip to Content

AOL Tech

Web

Switched Asks: Do Personal E-Shoppers Get It Right?

Netflix figures out what movies you might like to see, Pandora offers up new tunes you might like to rock, and Facebook even senses who you might like to know. That being the case, it shouldn't be a feat of sartorial strength for a matrix to suggest a nice outfit to wear. So, when we got an invite to sample the e-shopper service on Covet, being the member on the Switched team most picky about what goes on my person, I volunteered to give it a try. (Also, I'm the only girl on staff, and while boys will soon be invited, this is currently a ladies-only club.)

After I signed up, Covet gave me a series of questions asking me to select which of two celebrities' styles I most liked: Rachel Bilson vs. Kelly Osbourne; Vanessa Hudgens vs., well, anyone not Vanessa Hudgens. After a while, Covet presented my style profile: Edgy Modern/Edgy Boho. While I despise the term "Boho," and would only classify a triangle as edgy, the examples they gave were actually pretty appropriate. I do like edgier clothing, but with a soft, cosmopolitan touch.

Next, Covet sent me through a list of silhouettes, and I had to choose patterns and styles I didn't like, which was difficult. Yes, I'm a fan of plaid, but only when it's subtle. Leopard print is acceptable, but not always. Here is the problem with matrix-based profiles: No room for exceptions. Without question, the part I liked best was getting to select prices. My mother always said a girl should never skimp on a great winter coat, but good luck getting me to spend three digits on a T-shirt. Covet did a great job of letting me customize how much I would want to drop and on what, ensuring that I wasn't getting bombarded by profiles of stuff I couldn't afford.

When my first stylized e-mail arrived, I was thrilled. The Internet had been scoured, my personality diluted into tiny bits, and -- I hoped -- my next "It" coat sent to my in-box. To my dismay, however, the majority of the stuff was horrible. Fortunately, Covet let me peruse and point out what I hated, and my next e-mail (The service lets you choose how frequently mail arrives.) was slightly better. The third e-mail I received was okay (still some suspicious Ed Hardy), but a couple of gems appeared. Covet's premise was correct: The more I let it know what I hated and loved, the better it got at predicting both.

My best buying still springs from me, a mouse, and my never-ending feeds and discount sites, but Covet does present an easy alternative (probably better for someone less picky). Still, even if it's manned by a group of geniuses, a predictive matrix can never fully replicate simple human taste.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

About HGG

Our handy Holiday Gift Guide, filled with everything from the top HDTVs to the year's best point and shoot cameras, will make gift-giving in 2009 a breeze. Begin browsing on the left or sort your options below.

Autoblog

DailyFinance

Download Squad

Engadget

Joystiq

Urlesque

Fanhouse Main

WalletPop

Gadling