Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Entrapment? Oh, so what. Entrapment doesn't happen, much less succeed, unless the suspicious person has strong reason to believe he's messing up. She suspected, maybe even knew, and needed proof. What should she have done--gone on letting him abuse young girls?

Entrapment is when a person is coerced into doing something that he or she is not already predisposed to do. What the wife did in this incident was not entrapment, because if he didnt proposition her, he would have propositioned a real 14 yo girl. He was already determined that he was going to proposition what he thought was a 14 yo girl, therefore its not entrapment.

If you would reread the story the wife became suspcious because of all of his computer activity! He was busted with child porn on HIS computer, how did she entrap him? What was he doing in what he thought was a teenage chat room? Once again the women are blasted, she may have saved a teen girl. You should be praising her!

Seriously?? Your defending a man who not only had child porn on his computer, but visited teen chatrooms? What kind of world are we living in where people actually excuse the husbands behavior because of his wife's looks or give the wife sh*t for turning in her perverted husband??? He plead guilty to 8 counts of child pornography and this is his wife's fault because she "clearly" just wanted out of the marriage.. divorce is not that complicated. It would not be necessary for her to go to such measures to get a divorce. If she wasn't as brave as she was she could have left him (or not) and not said anything to the police therefore letting this pervert stay out on the streets to pray on young girls. What if he was chatting with your daughter or little sister? I can gaurantee you would be out for blood. This is why our country is so f'ed up! We continue to accept poor behavior and put blame where it shouldn't be. When will this perverted behavior become unacceptable?? Ridiculous!!

Entrapment?? He thought he was "talking" to a 14 yr. old girl? So it was her fault he got caught, & now he's not allowed to enter a "chat room" w/ anyone under 18! C'mon! He thought he was talking w/ a 14 yr. old, but was his 69 year old wife. ANYONE can give a false age! I can't believe (well, yes I can) that his excuse is some kind of nuerological disorder! I think it's more like a pervert!

Entrapment!!! Are you kidding me what was he doing going into a teen chatroom in the first place? What was he looking for? Maybe someone that wanted to sell there pokemon cards? Give me a break you nieve dumb@$$. It's people like you that give the rest of us a bad name. You probably think that this a a disease like tiff and scott and that it's treatable. It's treatable alright with a pair of tinsnips and a propane torch.

Are you joking? oh come on first of all a man who is not a pedophile would not reply to that 14 year old girl. and second. he already was a pedophile. he was caught with child pornography. so thank god he got caught before he was able to rape a poor girl.

Lauryn....you have no idea what that woman was going through. I say good for her! That sneaky pervert DID know what he was doing!!! These guys are so stupid...all they think about is what feels good for them! They all deserve to get caught.

Lauryn said 9:39AM on 11-16-2009:

"Whatever, she was clearly looking for a way to not only divorce him but also punish him. Smells like entrapment. You have to know that she contacted him first and "led him on," it's not like such a coincidence would ever happen that of all the people on the internet, he would just happen to be talking to her alter-ego."

I swear to god, people can't even handle the simple task of READING! Did you not see in the article where it said that pornographic images of underage girls were found on his computer? Or maybe the part that said he plead guilty?

Sometimes I really worry about America...

To Lauryn who says:
Lauryn said 9:39AM on 11-16-2009
Whatever, she was clearly looking for a way to not only divorce him but also punish him. Smells like entrapment. You have to know that she contacted him first and "led him on," it's not like such a coincidence would ever happen that of all the people on the internet, he would just happen to be talking to her alter-ego.

Lauryn, she was suspicious because he was already on the teenage website using that name. She did not lure him to the site. He did that himself. So please explain how this is her fault. Re-read the article and think it through please.