Students Create 'Pro-Rape' Facebook Group

Although the page was taken down at the end of October, many people are still upset about the group. Linda Burney, New South Wales's minister for women, says it made her sick. "The idea that a group of young men that are going to become leaders within our community, leaders in the law, leaders in medicine, leaders in business, studying at an elite college, at an elite university, think it's okay to post information like this encouraging rape on a Web site is absolutely abhorrent," she told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. The university's vice-chancellor Michael Spence even spoke out to the Herald. "I am appalled by the reported behavior and apparent attitudes of some students," he said. But despite this uproar, the creators of the public group haven't been punished by the university.
With Facebook booming, there's bound to be some idiots spreading hate on the social networking site. People just need to keep an eye out so it'll quickly get the boot. There's no excuse for the 'Define Statutory' group's three-month stay on Facebook. Let's hope that the dimwits behind the group have an even shorter stay in college. [From: Telegraph and The Sydney Morning Herald]





Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says















Comments
5
Subscribe to commentsBarbie SpeerNov 10th 2009 2:21PM
Funny old world when people go out of their way to publicize their stupidity
CoopNov 10th 2009 2:58PM
I'm very curious, especially since this article fails to address it, what the motivation for creating such a site might have been. The name of the site, "Define Statutory," suggests that the site owners may have been trying to make a point. For instance, maybe the site is against the concept of putting someone in jail for having consensual sex with a partner who happens to be below an arbitrarily determined age of consent.
This article doesn't do anything but malign the site and its creators on very superficial grounds. Maybe it was a stupid site. Maybe not. Based on this article, it's impossible to tell.
MadMikeNov 10th 2009 3:38PM
Coop, I don't think it was entirely against conflicting statutory ages per se. I think they crossed the fine line between arguing freedom of what the government says is an illegal relationship. It's not entirely about where laws meet society and ever changing social norms.
I'm married to a younger woman. She is 27 and I am 37. At our current ages, the relationship is more than acceptable. However, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, if our relationship started 10 years prior, it would be considered illegal unless her parents consented. Now where a 10 year age difference may seem a lot, what about an 19 year old dating a 16 year old? That isn't by any means a large age gap. However, why in some states that considered illegal? Now, don't get me wrong. Women under the age of 15, there shouldn't be a discussion, if your 18+, stay away. However, I think mentally 16yr old women are capable of making consent in dealing with relationships. I met my wife when she was 25, while she was definitely more mature than 17, cognitively she was the same.
I think these guys missed proving a point and just used that issue as a facade for some sort of sick joke or even worse, an intent to rape.
SoCoolCurt (PSN: KillaKornbread - XBL: SoCoolCurt)Nov 10th 2009 3:40PM
i agree. that's one reason i don't read Switched all that much. A LOT of the articles are written in this manor. they take a side and then leave out the details that would allow the reader to make their own decisions on the matter. though at the same time, i guess it is a blog and not a news site, so the author is allowed to opinionated if they want. doesn't help the reader much though.
southboundcowboyNov 10th 2009 4:33PM
Try it with MY young daughter. You will wish the police got you first.
Cowboy