Ever since they started cutting costs in the face of an industry-wide slowdown a few years ago,
airlines haven't exactly been Mr. Popular among traveling consumers. Long lines and delays have left most passengers dismayed and disgruntled. And now, one airline in particular faces a growing PR crisis after firing one of its employees over... defending his company?
The former worker, identified only by the mysterious "Mr. X," was a Web designer for American Airlines, and, as Web designers are wont to do, found himself online one day, browsing through blogs. One post, in particular, gave him pause. Fellow designer Dustin Curtis composed an extensive
open letter to the airline, complaining about its
Web site, suggesting an alternative
look, and recommending that it fire its Web design team. Mr. X, upon reading the blog, courteously
responded via e-mail, saying that Curtis was "so very right," but noting that any Web inadequacies had less to do with staff incompetency and more to do with the "internal culture" of the company.
According to the Telegraph, he also assured Curtis that the site was under renovation, and that improvements would be forthcoming.
At this point, American Airlines stepped in. Apparently, in speaking to Curtis, Mr. X violated a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) that he had signed with the airline and that prohibited him from revealing "sensitive information." The airline then searched its database, found his e-mail, and
fired him. For his part, Curtis defended Mr. X,
writing. "AA fired Mr X because he cared. They fired him because he cared enough to reach out to a dissatisfied customer and help clear the company's name in the best way he could."
We couldn't agree more. Though it may technically be considered a violation of the NDA, we're not so sure anything the employee said was all that sensitive. If anything, it was positive news he was spreading. Moreover, he was doing it in an exceedingly gracious and conciliatory manner -- something that's become increasingly rare in the industry as a whole. We're not sure, but we have a hunch that there's some other, hidden, story here (perhaps the whole "internal culture" comment?). Either way, we think it's a pretty egregious injustice, and we hope something's done to remedy it. [From:
The Telegraph]
http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,entry&id=489072&pid=489071&uts=1258032734
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/cs_feed_v1_6/csfeedwrapper.swf
Anti-Corporate Protests and Boycotts
Motrin Ad Pulled Due to Online Protests
In November of last year, mothers took to the Twitter-streets in protest of a Motrin video advertisement that, they claimed, belittled young mothers. In no time, Johnson and Johnson took down the ad, posting a letter of apology.
Apple Pulls "You Can't Be Too Thin" Ads
In 2007, after airing an ill-advised ad campaign for their new line of iMacs that featured the tag line "You Can't Be Too Thin," Apple received innumerable complaints, including one from the Alliance for Eating Disorders Awareness. The ads were promptly pulled.
Boycotting Sellers Dent eBay's Business
In February of last year, eBay sellers banded in a boycott after the Web site laid claim to higher commissions on sold goods and eliminated sellers' ability to give negative feedback to buyers. In just one week, eBay's listings dropped by 13 percent.
Students Stage Virtual Protest on Facebook
Disturbed by HSBC's suspension of their free overdraft protection, collegiate customers of the bank launched a Facebook protest in 2007. Backed by the National Union of Students, the online protest won out as HSBC decided to maintain the policy.
Facebook Lactivists Take Protests to the Street Over Breastfeeding Pictures
Last month, self-described "lactivists" set up shop outside Facebook's headquarters to protest the site's removal of all images containing breastfeeding mothers.
Tags: airlines, american airlines, AmericanAirlines, employment, fired, top, workplace
Comments
81
Subscribe to commentsMobile Phone DivaNov 10th 2009 5:41PM
Fired for helping someone and actually providing GOOD customer service for a change! Sad, just sad.
meNov 12th 2009 9:11AM
Read "Mr. X's" response, and you'll see he wasn't providing "good customer service" or defending anyone but himself. He threw AA under the bus and complained that he COULD do a better job if he didn't have to "slog through endless review and approval cycles with their requisite revisions and re-reviews." He complained that his department didn't have control over the entire site, as Marketing, Publishing, and Advantage groups made their own changes "without going through us." All of this is listed on Curtis's blog as the "response from AA."
Mobile Phone DivaNov 12th 2009 8:48PM
So he told the truth to a customer who asked a question, and was fired? Just as sad. Honest answers are better than sugar coating.
If it's the truth that the review process may hurt progress, so be it. If it's true that too many departments may have a hand in this without consulting each other, so be it. No company is perfect and telling the customer it is, is BS. I'd accept an honest answer like that more. Violating the non-disclosure clause is telling people the company may not have perfect policies? LOL!
kvravitNov 10th 2009 6:57PM
Come on AA, prove your piece of krap reputation wrong and rehire the fella!
hmanhuNov 10th 2009 8:30PM
I agree, it is indeed a sad day when a company fires an employee for trying to do the right thing. I used to have a high opinion of AA but this shows me that there is no reason to continue to do so. It's recent actions have clearly indicated that customer service and satisfaction are no longer high on its list of priorities. It also shows that it no longer prizes loyalty from its employees and contractors. Perhaps the lesson to be learned here is that if you are an AA employee or contractor and see or hear wha you consider to be an unfair or unjustified negative comment about the company just hold your tongue and let the negative impression stand rather than try to defend the company and have its subsequent actions prove that the negative commentator was probably right.
nohmadd13aNov 10th 2009 10:48PM
It is the culture of all large organizations lately to have NDA's coupled with some form of zero tolerance. There by no mater what caused something to happen the narrow minded and lacking in common sense can continue to drive our corporations into the ground. Conform or be eliminated, we do not care what your motivations are. (This spreads to the labor unions also) Many good ideas are scrapped because they fail to muster up to some narrow rule that has no right being the final position. You can have an idea or do something that can save the comapny money and expand its base. Be that business base or good customer relations.
Those who run our major corporations of late seem to have no common sense, and god forbid they have to actually look into something beyond the surface. This man did the right thing but someone viewed it as a violation of the NDA he signed. When he did not disclose any sensitive information, nor did he go against the comapny in an attempt to bring to light improvements in work and attempting to improve the comapanies image.
I own a business so I can speak from experience. While not all employee actions are right, or benificial to the company, there are those few times where it is, and we do not have a hard fast rule system. We have a general rule structure, and look at each possible violation on a case by case basis so that good employees, or even bad ones, who are motivated to help the company even if in a minor violation do not ge railroaded out the door. AA should reconsider and rehire, and slap those who fired him.
speedwayvictorNov 11th 2009 4:44AM
AA has been my family preferred carrier of all times, not even 911 deterred us from using it, we always felt comfortable traveling with them to all parts of the world, the thought of using any other airline never crossed our mind, it's called loyalty (something I now realize AA lacks) and so this employee who's only wrong-doing was that of potraying a positive image about the company he works for, turns around and GETS FIRED (there is something mighty wrong with this picture). Well as they say 'all good things come to an end', thank you AA for all those years I was blind about you, but I don't think my family and I would use your services anymore...........in fact I know we won't. GOOD LUCK TO YOU MR. X
rvplaceNov 12th 2009 6:18AM
I am a nobody but breeding corporate behavior like this is wrong, I can only vote with my dollar, no more flying with AA. You no longer have my money to continue your corporate ways.....don't worry AA, there are many customers out there who don't care and will keep purchasing tickets from you. Thats sad.
datamaryckNov 12th 2009 6:29AM
I had the misfortune of flying American Airlines to Texas. It was the worst flying experience of my life. All 4 flights (not direct -- had 1 stopover) were overbooked. The lies at the counters were unbelievably long, The ancient DC-9 seats were incredibly uncomfortable. There was little space between rows. Every person I dealt for each of the 4 flights except one, was surly and difficult. The plane was not clean. It will be a long, long time before I fly American again.
ENJOYOURDAYNov 12th 2009 6:40AM
THIS REALLY IS A CRUMMY SCENARIO. I THINK THAT PEOPLE WHO CARE AS MUCH AS MR. X. APPARENTLY DID TYPICALLY GO ON TO GREENER PASTURES. SOMETIMES THEY CONTINUE TO WORK IN THANKLESS POSITIONS UNTIL THEY ARE PUSHED TO MAKE OTHER CHOICES. LOOKING BACK, I THINK THAT MR. X. WILL WILL ONE DAY BE SO HAPPY THAT HE IS AWAY FROM SUCH AND UNGRATEFUL EMPLOYER. HE SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED A "BONUS" FOR HIS DEDICATION TO THE COMPANY IMAGE INSTEAD OF A PINK SLIP!
ChrisNov 12th 2009 6:42AM
Blaming the "internal culture" of the company hardly sounds like some spirited defense of the company.
Sounds more like his motivation for even responding was to defend himself and shift the blame to the company.
LeonardNov 12th 2009 5:12PM
Great job AA. Fire one of your better employees for some stupid reason. Never fly AA again.
therumrunnerNov 12th 2009 7:11AM
sounds like we are only hearing one side of this, in all my years of customer service seldom if ever does it go the exact way either side repeats it, if this in fact was true seems to me he would have at least a hearing with the labor board.
KatNov 12th 2009 7:13AM
That is exactly why I refuse to fly American Airlines.
hanklee9393Nov 12th 2009 7:23AM
AA stop jacking with Mr. X he's just helping the company. Give him his job back and tell him you made a mistake. Some times it good to over look rule and use common sense.
hank
pennsy671Nov 12th 2009 7:36AM
Good bye American Airlines... It is only a matter of time before you close your doors. It happens to the best of them, remember "Eastern Airlines"...
I would think the suit who wrote the policy should be the one getting canned. Not Mr X for attempting to better his companies customer service. You have to wonder, when we read crap like this, what are we not hearing about?
This is a death sentence for AA,
I'll be taking my business to some other terminal and gate.
ferippeeNov 12th 2009 7:42AM
These companies think that they can just ruin peoples' lives. Sometimes they can't. The management of AA fired the web designer mid web rebuild. Talk about cutting off their nose to spite their face. That's got to hurt when the thing doesn't work right and folks like me use the web to do our ticketing. Oh well, stupid is as stupid does. But the main reason for this blog is that in Oregon, these rotten managers got to firing folks for, well, basically not being in the company boot camp and allowing poor managers to yell at them and belittle them. The state unemployment insurance department reviewed the firings and determined that the state was not allowing the firing of the employees because of 'personality clashes' where the state's unemployment insurance coffers would be drained. Therefore the state sued the companies for wrongful discharge and won and the employees were reinstated. Maybe . . .
SueNov 12th 2009 10:27PM
Sadly, the poor customer service from AA has slid to include poor employee treatment. I no longer fly AA. I just booked a flight with a different airline for my travels during this Thanksgiving week. (there are 13 in my family traveling this week, and we ALL choose to ban AA)
EboneeNov 12th 2009 7:53AM
Budget cuts make anxious decision makers create situations. Give him back his job!!
Smart ObserverNov 12th 2009 7:59AM
RE Hire Mr. X or lose me as a frequent flier on AA airlines. Stupidity (firing the guy for doing good work) does not deserve any rewards. I'll anticipate a response from AA management that they've re-hired Mr. X.