<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Personally, I have never really been a big fan of this "convergence" of technology.  The only upside that these multi-faceted devices have is that if people only rely on the one device to meet all their needs then you find yourself using less natural resources. (i.e. if everyone used the iPhone instead of buying computers, mp3 players, camcorders, cameras, etc., then less natural resources would be used to build these other devices).  Obviously, it is a silly example as this is not going to happen, but it is the only upside that I see.  <br><br>I hate the fact that Apple deems the iPhone as a gaming machine.  It can run games and it has some good ones on there but do people buy an iPhone so they can play games?  I don't think so.  The primary function of an iPhone is to transmit/receive calls/texts.  Everything else is just a marketing scheme to get people to buy their product instead of someone else's.  Companies started bundling other functions with their phones so that they could separate themselves from the pack.  Humans can do arithmetic in their head, does that mean we are calculators too?  No, of course not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bastion78]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2009 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who wears a watch anymore?  Who carries a planner around?  Get into an accident, you take pics with your phone. See something you want to recall later, take a pic. Don't have a good camera with you, well at least you have that.  Waiting on an email for something, there it is.  Need to look up a number, an address, whatever, well at least you have that.  In a society where we are all on the move constantly, it's a lot easier to have an all-in-one with you than either 20 devices or nothing at all.  It's like carrying an all purpose Leatherman -- no it's not a machete or a carving knife or screwdriver or a good pair of pliers, but it's pretty darn handy to have around all the same.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[seequill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 10:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lets all go back to using pagers]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SmarterthanTomthinksIam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2009 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have an iTouch in my car. I leave it there all the time. I can't imagine plugging in an iPhone each time I get into my car... I have built-in navigation in the car which is far superior to any navigation software that is built for any 'convergence' device. Taking pictures? I have a Nikon DSLR. Capturing video? The Nikon supports hi-def. I guess that is a bit of convergence - video & still in one device - but at least those functions are somewhat related... Gaming? I have a PS3, a Wii and a PC with high-end gaming capabilities. Watching video? Every airliner I care to on-board these days come with excellent built-in enterntainment (Virgin America, for example). Why pretend to be watching video on a tiny device? iPhone or many other 'convergence' devices are for people who don't seek excellence and are OK with 'converged' mediocrity. Others who do not have to carry out a phone conversation while watching a video while an MP3 track is on pause while trying to save a high-score on a joke of a game while trying to figure out where they parked their car on a navigation screen while recording themselves carrying out all these activities to facebook it before twitting about it  while wondering when the next release of this piece of garbage will come out... Are quite happy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BikingRadio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2009 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[BikingRadio - that's all well and good but it sounds to me that you have A LOT of money to spend on all that stuff.  MOST people have to choose where they're going to spend their bucks and they can't simply buy a:<br><br>+iPhone<br>+iPod Touch<br>+Wii<br>+PS3<br>+PC<br>+Nikon brand Digital SLR w/HD video capability<br>+a car with a built-in navigation system, and<br>+fly on fancy airlines<br><br>You're poo-pooing of a multi-faceted device that MEETS THE NEEDS of many, many, MANY people shows you not to be discriminating, but rather aloof!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am looking for a simple phone with large numeric keypad and 3 inch screen.<br>It should also have solar panel to recharge the battery.<br>The only feature I need is the call list (for incoming, outgoing and missed calls).<br><br>Didn't we old timers were quite OK with the rotary phone and the touch-tone phone was such a novelty until the phone companies started adding it as a separate service that we couldn't live without? I remember paying around $12 a month for my phone line 35 years ago. It is $66 just for basic service now. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pst2868]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 7th 2009 10:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[I pay around 60 a month and I have no caller id, and I can't punch 69 to find out who called me as a prank.  <br>It blows.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GENNIE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 10:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[JITTER BUG! cell phone!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[turbomaxima]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're using the wrong phone service. I pay $6.00 per month for a landline]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[starsky117]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hear, hear!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SallijaneG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 1:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unitaskers are almost always better at what ever it is your attempting to do..with the obvious drawback you must then always drag around every unitasker you MIGHT need. I love my iphone which actually operates better then my dated ipod at music, and for my web browsing and searching when I'm out and about because it FITS IN MY POCKET. One thing not, 50. And as a bonus it has some handy little apps. <br>Consider the Emergency cardiac monitor/defib/cardioverter/12 lead ECG/Capnography device I routinely use as a paramedic...there are better unitaskers for each of those functions, but if I had all that,  I'd be a in a ER not carrying it into your living room. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 7:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is why im still using a 7 year old nokia, dont need all the yuppie crap. bought it for a phone and a phone is all I need. its all about marketing and the young folks gotta have the latest and usually not so greatest. get back to basics. the more complicated the more likely it will fail sooner. your iphone wont last 7 years you can bet that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[monte]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm a Verizon customer and I tried one of their Samsung Omnia smartphones (for free, no less, on my "New Every Two" plan) and was very disappointed.  I found it impossible to access the contact list or even simply dial a number manually with one hand (as I often like to do), and equally painful to access most other phone-related functions.  Its web browser was respectable (as are the browsers I've seen on other smartphones like the Storm and Pearl and iPhone).  But I need a phone to make phone calls!  Browsing and email are bonuses.  I finally returned the Omnia and upgraded from my venerable RAZR to a GZ Boulder, which is a fine phone, although I still miss a few of the RAZR's slicker features (such as the way it speaks each contact's name aloud as I scroll throught the list so I dont have to always be looking at the phone to use it).  And both of these flip-phones have simple external on-off toggles for the speakerphone (which I prefer greatly when accessing voice mail or anything else that requires me to listen, then press a key), whereas the Omnia required a maddening trip through the touch-screen menu.  In the long term, I think the answer (for me, anyway) would be to have a phone for making calls, and a separate smartphone-sized device for email and web browsing.  Then I could browse the web while also talking on the phone (something I do with my laptop at home all the time).  Too bad the wireless companies have priced this capability out of reach for most individual users.  The wireless industry needs a reasonably priced flat-rate unlimited-use data plan independent of the voice plan, like home internet providers offer.  Only then will handheld internet use really hit the mainstream.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[harleyrider686]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm a Verizon customer and I tried one of their Samsung Omnia smartphones (for free, no less, on my "New Every Two" plan) and was very disappointed.  I found it impossible to access the contact list or even simply dial a number manually with one hand (as I often like to do), and equally painful to access most other phone-related functions.  Its web browser was respectable (as are the browsers I've seen on other smartphones like the Storm and Pearl and iPhone).  But I need a phone to make phone calls!  Browsing and email are bonuses.  I finally returned the Omnia and upgraded from my venerable RAZR to a GZ Boulder, which is a fine phone, although I still miss a few of the RAZR's slicker features (such as the way it speaks each contact's name aloud as I scroll throught the list so I dont have to always be looking at the phone to use it).  And both of these flip-phones have simple external on-off toggles for the speakerphone (which I prefer greatly when accessing voice mail or anything else that requires me to listen, then press a key), whereas the Omnia required a maddening trip through the touch-screen menu.  In the long term, I think the answer (for me, anyway) would be to have a slim, simple phone for making calls, and a separate smartphone-sized device for email and web browsing.  Then I could browse the web while also talking on the phone (something I do with my laptop at home all the time).  Too bad the wireless companies have priced this capability out of reach for most individual users.  The wireless industry needs a reasonably priced flat-rate unlimited-use data plan independent of the voice plan, like home internet providers offer.  Only then will handheld internet use really hit the mainstream.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 9:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love my iPhone.  I never used to take pictures or video but now I always have a camera with me.  I take more pics and vids of my kids.  I only get on my laptop when I am forced to.  I do everything else on my iPhone.  I think this guy is crazy!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Shorts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 1:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[i realy don't understand why someone wants to carry in their pocket access to all the info on the web. if all that info is so vital, i suggest they stay locked in their office or home with access to all that info without wasting other energy.<br><br>and then there's the gaming part. what a waste. if access to all that info is so important; who has time to play games?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RON]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 9:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thus far, Martin Cooper is absolutely right about current devices doing a lot of things poorly. One of the newest reasons for this is the shift to cloud computing. I liked my phones when the software and data was in the phone. Sure they were big, but they worked better than the "cloud". I fail to see how or even when users/customers of products became so complacent about poor functionality and often, poor quality. Nowadays the phones don't even make calls well, as anyone on the AT&T Wireless system can tell you. The web is full of reports that their network infrastructure is so overburdened by the cloud computing being used by their i-Phone apps that those of us who wish simply to call our Moms, have two or three dropped calls during a fifteen minute conversation.<br><br>My wife, who is a film and video producer got a full featured smart phone because the documentation clearly stated that it can play video attachments or stream videos in a wide variety of formats including 3g, wmv, mpg and avi. This would be very useful as she often has to approve clips while in production and doing it "on the run" would be time-saving. The catch? It doesn't play anything she needs to view.  After two devices and dozens of calls to tech support we discovered that all videos to be watched on a mobile device must be saved by the sender or creator in a "for mobile device" format, which simply means a low resolution or frame size. What? they're supposed to take the time to separately make lo-res clips of HD video just for approval?  That's is never going to happen in her industry. It's too time consuming. So for the time being, she's carrying her MAC to hotspots everywhere she goes.<br><br>As for me, I also still have my RazR and use it only to make calls or send texts. My camera takes 12 megapixel photos, which phones cannot do and I am, quite frankly, glad to be away from the world wide web and email when I'm out and about. So for now,  I agree with Martin and have A LOT of friends who feel the same.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 9:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do they have a cell phone that receives and makes calls ONLY? I don't want, texting, Internet, caller ID, call back, repeat dialing, roaming charges, movies, TV, or any of that other stuff that phone service companies provides for suckers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA[Chuck,<br>  I have a Sanyo phone with Sprint as a carrier. It does have internet capability and text. I don't have either one enabled though. I can make and receive calls and messages. I also have a wireless receiver on my visor for hands free while driving, no plug in MY ear<br>Tom]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Are Mobile Devices Getting Too Complex?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/11/07/cell-phone-inventor-says-mobile-devices-are-too-complex/</guid><description><![CDATA["Smart" phones have no common sense.  I hate it when I can't make an urgent call because the OS is frozen and I need to reboot or reset the device.  Or when one voice channel suddenly drops out because of a known software bug that requires a hotfix.  Often I only have a few minutes to make a call, and I can't be wasting that precious time trying to get the device to perform what should be a simple operation.  I have now gone back to a low feature flip phone which I only use for calls.  I have yet to have a problem or miss a call with it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GFPalm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2009 10:28AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
