<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Could Robot Writers Take Over Sportswriters' Jobs?</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/10/20/could-robot-writers-take-over-sportswriters-jobs/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Could Robot Writers Take Over Sportswriters' Jobs?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Could Robot Writers Take Over Sportswriters' Jobs?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/10/20/could-robot-writers-take-over-sportswriters-jobs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/10/20/could-robot-writers-take-over-sportswriters-jobs/</guid><description><![CDATA[If a monkey can do the job of the television reporters, then why not have a robot write sports?  The problem is "What are the sportswriters writing about?"  There's no reason to read what they say unless it's designed or designated to hurt someone.  They don't provide information that is useful from a betting angle trying to protect the integrity of the sport.  That's crap.  If someone is hurt, report it.  If someone is motivated for revenge, report it.  If someone has something to prove, report it.  A robot is only as good as the information put into it.  Garbage in and garbage out.  I wouldn't be worried about the robot.  I'd be worried about the blogger who has contacts with the janitors, parking attendants, and girlfriends of the players.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cecil Jones]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2009 4:58AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
