<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Google Chrome, One Year Later</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/09/03/google-chrome-one-year-later/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Google Chrome, One Year Later</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google Chrome, One Year Later]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/09/03/google-chrome-one-year-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/09/03/google-chrome-one-year-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Google Chrome works for me....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fastharryDOTcom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 3rd 2009 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google Chrome, One Year Later]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/09/03/google-chrome-one-year-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/09/03/google-chrome-one-year-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[Out off all the browsers I have used I think Chrome gave me the fasted browsing experience. I only use Firefox more often because of ad-block. Which is a great convenience. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 3rd 2009 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google Chrome, One Year Later]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/09/03/google-chrome-one-year-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/09/03/google-chrome-one-year-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[It really amazes me how little Chrome has progressed in the past year. I know there are a tone of projects that Google is toying with ( Wave comes to mind) but still if they are to be taken seriously they really need to put some effort into it. The extension framework was promised for 2.0 and they are currently working on version 4 so google is slowly becoming worst than MS. A mac and linux version was also promised to come around version 2 if I am not mistaken but that is still not a reality. To be totally honest Safari actually is a lot more polished browser even on Windows. Plus they have a web inspector which is better than the Google implementation. The only thing that chrome has going on for it is the multiple processes. It might seem like a great idea on paper but in reality most browsers don't really crash as much as they used to. And when they do it's annoying but not a huge deal. But the last one might change if google build an OS on top of chrome ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cg0def]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 6:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google Chrome, One Year Later]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/09/03/google-chrome-one-year-later/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/09/03/google-chrome-one-year-later/</guid><description><![CDATA[I use Chrome at work and at home. Working in software technical support, I talk to hundreds of people each week. The nearly exclusive reason most people don't want to switch from FireFox to Chrome is they don't want to leave behind Adblock and NoScript.<br><br>Maybe it's because I've always had a fast computer, but I've never had a problem leaving the ads turned on. I don't understand the popularity of those plug-ins. Chrome is very clean and stupid simple. I'm glad Sony is preloading the browser on their new computers. I couldn't imagine a better browser for big-box buyers, with no add-on toolbars, security by obscurity, and very good compatibility.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 4th 2009 9:03AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
