Is Wikipedia Too Big for Its Own Good?

In a blog post for the New York Times, writer Noam Cohen reflects on the challenges that Wikipedia faces in the coming years, as brought up at last week's Wikimania conference in Buenos Aires. One of the major points of discussion was the incredible growth the site had, and why it's currently slowing down. One of the theories offered suggests that most general topics have entries now, and future growth will be more dependent on "specialized articles, maintenance and news, both events and ideas and products."
Perhaps the greatest issue of all, though, is the very concept of the site itself: an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. As the site has grown over the years, pages have become more difficult to edit due to complex layouts, and "bots" that make edits on a mass scale. Page vandalism has also become a problem, and there is rising controversy on how to manage and maintain quality page edits.
The bigger Wikipedia becomes, the more potential it has to become an invaluable part of our lives -- but at what price? Does the site abandon it's very own motto of democratic and open contributions? Should they open the floodgates and hope we, the public, can sort it all out? Tell us what you think in the comments below! [From: The New York Times]



Add your comments