Feds Promise Faster Action, Transparency in Laptop Searches

Powerful entities like Wisconsin's Democratic Senator Russell Feingold and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have both voiced concerns with the policy, pushing for measures that would better protect civil liberties and ensure government accountability. Of the changes in policy, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told the Wall Street Journal that the government would begin to better document gadget searches and seizures, and return said gadgets more quickly to travelers. According to the policy changes, border agents will be able to hold devices for five days, while Immigration and Customs Enforcement employees will be able to do so for up to 30. Still, investigating agents will require neither a traveler's permission nor probable cause.
While Feingold seems content with the changes, the ACLU is not. On behalf of the organization, ACLU counsel Chris Calabrese told the Journal, "We are still talking about the searches of everyone's laptops without standards." It should be noted that, as invasive as all this might sound, such searches and seizures are rare (if you take the government's word for it, at least). The Feds claimed yesterday that -- from Oct. 1, 2008 up to a couple weeks ago -- only 1,000 laptops were taken from the hands of the 221 million travelers that passed through. Of those, officials said, only 46 were given in-depth inspections. [From: Wall Street Journal]



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
tdorsett7 said 12:18PM on 8-29-2009
This is totally uncalled for and a blatant invasion of privacy.
Reply
Nicolette said 8:27PM on 8-29-2009
no one has any business searching anything with out a warrant. We've given up our rights- we now only have the rights when and where they choose to let us 'have' them.
Reply
Sallijane said 9:33PM on 8-29-2009
NIcolette, you are so right. From Watergate to the present, it has only been getting worse. We must take back the rights defined in the constitution, and make sure that the citizens are watching the government.
Reply