<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for 'Rorschach' Wikipedia Entry Angers Some Psychologists</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/08/24/rorschach-wikipedia-entry-angers-some-psychologists/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for 'Rorschach' Wikipedia Entry Angers Some Psychologists</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on 'Rorschach' Wikipedia Entry Angers Some Psychologists]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/08/24/rorschach-wikipedia-entry-angers-some-psychologists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/08/24/rorschach-wikipedia-entry-angers-some-psychologists/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, as a therapist myself, I can say that the Rorschach is NOT used as a "standard" test any longer.  It is a subjective test that only reveals how the person views the images that are viewed by the person taking the test.  Other, much more reliable subjective tests are used today, but subjective tests are just that -- SUBJECTIVE and the results are filtered through the personal biases of the person doing the intepretation.  For those psychologists and therapists that are in an uproar about the ink blots being revealed to the public, well perhaps they need to review their own education and update their methodology when working with clients.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[marigoldg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 24th 2009 11:09PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
