'Rorschach' Wikipedia Entry Angers Some Psychologists

According to the New York Times, the College of Physicians and Surgeons in Saskatchewan is now investigating Heilman because of complaints from two psychologists who claim that his actions represent "serious misconduct" and "disrespect." Heilman likened the investigation to "intimidation tactics," adding that the complaining parties are "trying to close the doors on scientific discourse."
A study published in Psychological Science in the Public Interest concluded that the Rorschach test is generally not all that reliable, saying that "clinical evaluations should be based on more dependable assessment techniques, such as structured psychiatric interviews." It seems, then, that the only doctors Heilman may be disrespecting are those who'd rather rely on the results of a possibly outdated and biased test. [From: The New York Times, Wikipedia, and PsychCentral]





Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Did the Diva Diss Her Ex-Hubby With Revealing New Song?














Comments
1
Subscribe to commentsmarigoldgAug 24th 2009 11:09PM
Actually, as a therapist myself, I can say that the Rorschach is NOT used as a "standard" test any longer. It is a subjective test that only reveals how the person views the images that are viewed by the person taking the test. Other, much more reliable subjective tests are used today, but subjective tests are just that -- SUBJECTIVE and the results are filtered through the personal biases of the person doing the intepretation. For those psychologists and therapists that are in an uproar about the ink blots being revealed to the public, well perhaps they need to review their own education and update their methodology when working with clients.