Tumblr 101: Tips And Tricks To Get Started
Sebastian Thrun: Google's Driverless Car
Robots Learn to Lie and Deceive Each Other in Search for 'Food'
Technology Review reports that a team of scientists at Switzerland's Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne are soon to release a study on robots equipped with artificial neural networks and programmed to locate 'food.' When a robot neared the 'food,' it flashed a blue light so other robots could also find it. With limited space around the 'food,' the robots soon learned this wasn't the best idea. The researchers copied and combined the artificial neural networks of the most 'intelligent' robots, and made a few changes to the code to mimic biological mutations. As a result, the robots 'evolved' -- learning not to alert other each other to the food. After a few hundred (increasingly intelligent) 'generations,' the majority of robots didn't flash a light at all.
The researchers say this experiment will help scientists better grasp how biological communication systems evolve. In this case, it might not have happened very quickly, but the results, which will be published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, are pretty amazing. Pretty soon, we'll have those pesky robots to deal with at the dinner table, too. There goes any shot at seconds on Thanksgiving. [From: Technology Review]
Josh Powell's Last Words: 'I Am Not Able To Go On Anymore': Report
The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?
American Heart Month: 17 Celebrities Who Faced Heart Problems
Boss Indifferent To My Suicidal Impulse, Says Stock Trader Who Lost Millions
Katy Perry Divorce: With No Prenup How Much Will Russell Walk Away With?
Powell 911 Call Released: Cops Declare Investigation Of Missing Mom A Murder Case
Savings Experiment: Tissues vs. Toilet Paper
Hiroshi Ishiguro's android mannequin creeps out Japanese shoppers (video)
PHOTOS: Anti-Gay Protesters Getting Pwned
Blueseed: 'Startup Incubator' Could Sail Past Immigration Law
Randy Travis Apologizes for Public Intoxication
PHOTO: Miley Cyrus Wears Racy Garters
Savings Experiment: Snow Removal
Dozens Of D.C. Workers May Lose Jobs Over Alleged Unemployment Fraud
Dead Man Found In Foreclosed Home Four Years Later
Wrecks to Riches: Hunting Sunken Treasures from Cape Cod to the Costa Concordia
Laura Linney's Colorful Frocks
The Best And Worst Burgers
Is Social Media Causing The Mystery Illness?
PHOTOS: Massive Whale Shark Reeled Into Harbor
Mia Farrow's Low-Key, Philanthropic Style
Powell Boys Suffered 'Chop Injuries' Before Explosion
Lacrosse Player Accused Of Killing Ex-Girlfriend Emailed Her 'I Should Have Killed You'
Prop 8, California's Same-Sex Marriage Ban, Declared Unconstitutional
Staten Island Mother Suing City For $900 Trillion
Freakish Fossil Upends Ideas About Origins Of Animal Life
Missing Alaska Barista Had Filed Restraining Order Against Man
Obama's Favorite Day As President?
Werewolf Sisters Are Coated In Hair (PICTURES)
The 10 Biggest Sources Of Salt In Our Diets
Good Things Come In Small Packages: Top Selling American Craft Breweries (PHOTOS)
Post 50 Celebrity Dream Homes on the Market (PHOTOS)
Comments
4
Subscribe to commentsRandyAug 20th 2009 4:47PM
can they say "I'll be back"?
KJAug 20th 2009 5:51PM
The description of the experiment is pretty brief, but this seems pretty manipulative. You create a situation where robots that flash lights get less "food" and you assume that getting less "food" means your traits won't be passed down. Then you change the code to reward what you judge got more "food," and because of that, the robots evolve. This would be a more interesting experiment if the code could somehow pass itself down to generations and it did so based on success at getting food, as opposed to some programmer watching what happens and adjusting the code himself. Even that wouldn't take into account factors beyond gathering food, for example, if the other robots ostracize liars.
flgunnerAug 20th 2009 6:07PM
Is this so they can find the food before we do?
What a waste of money. Is there truly any useful logical reason for "studying" how these robots react? Unless they are being trained to take from humans by whatever means.
Davey RockefelerAug 20th 2009 10:06PM
Most computer scientists think within say about 70 years human beings could be at risk as a species from intelligent machines. Why would they want us around? Maybe a few controlled support people? Computers run our lives now anyway and we can't pull the plug. I used to sit and have a scope probe and chase their bits around trying to keep them up and running but now-people are almost out of the loop. Sooner or later.......Going back to my planet now.