DNA Evidence Can Be Fabricated, Research Says

Scientists at the Tel Aviv-based company Nucleix have been able to infuse one individual's DNA into blood and saliva samples of a completely different person. Also, according to the research, DNA can be fabricated to match DNA profiles saved in databases, without even having an original sample.
"You can just engineer a crime scene," Dr. Dan Frumkin told the Times. The lead author of the paper, Frumkin further explains, "Any undergraduate biology student could perform this." Tania Simoncelli, science adviser to the American Civil Liberties Union, makes the point more palpable: "DNA is a lot easier to plant at a crime scene than fingerprints."
While it might seem plausible that in the future we'll all have our DNA hacked, let's not panic quite yet. Dr. Frumkin has developed a test that should help forensic labs to determine real DNA from fabricated DNA. Let's hope it works. We'd prefer that 'identity theft' remain a figurative term. [From: The New York Times]





Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Grammy Red Carpet 2012 (PHOTOS)
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
Tips for flying cheaper in 2012
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Diva Tricks Fans With Faux Technical Meltdown
There's only one thing to do when the Nürburgring is covered in snow...
Tax Reform in This Election Year: It's Not Likely














Comments
3
Subscribe to commentstfarnonAug 19th 2009 7:11PM
NOT news, and NOT a surprise. I worked in molecular biology for 9 years. After the first year, I knew that DNA evidence could be faked. It would take a lot of work, more knowledge than the author of the paper lets on, some sophisticated equipment and special reagents, but it could be done.
EricAug 20th 2009 1:36AM
So now we just have to hope that people involved in impulsive, violent crimes don't have the necessary technology to make fake DNA... and have it planned out so that the DNA they leave at the crime scene doesn't belong to someone a few thousand miles away at the time of the incident.
RyanSep 23rd 2009 3:51PM
Good article! Keep in mind that the large majority of DNA evidence is produced by the prosecution. We've got detectives working with crime labs. Why not make DNA findings independent? Take a look at this article about wrongful convictions